RE: [WISPA] SSH DOS Killing Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Marty Dougherty
The infected sub was bandwidth managed with HTB to 256k cir, 1 mbps mir, but not anything for PPS. Tom- Why don't you just limit the number PPS at the customers radio? Marty -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: Saturday,

RE: [WISPA] churn, double play and why WLP is key - I finally understand it

2007-01-07 Thread Gino A. Villarini
Well, I haven't replied to this earlier cause Im on vacation (skiing @ Vail ) but now, let me add some info... I don't want to get involved in a gear fight, but a brand x gear has a Per Sector prioritization of traffic. It works like this: You set the cpe to identify the traffic to be

Re: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
Understand a major difference ATT for example sells GB fiber for $8000 per month. But they are selling layers 2 end to end to the subsciber. So because GB fiber is the customers first HOP, the customer's MTU can adjust to 9600MTU jumbo frames. For example if the customer has a GB switch

Re: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
Yes we also can psuh 800 mbps on a GB link Miktoik router to Mikrotik Router. But the test initiates on a Jumbo frame device and end on a jumbo frame device. Now try this test Connect 4 computers each to its own 100mbps switch (support only 1500mtu), Then take the 4 switches and plug

Re: [WISPA] SSH DOS Killing Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
And how would I do that? Yes I know, I think that is a VL feature, and my radio is not VL. If I were able to limit the PPS then that would solve the problem. But technically why should I have to limit the PPS, because the radios themselves are no where near getting saturated by the amount of

Re: [WISPA] SSH DOS Killing Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
Thanks Steve! I think that should help alot. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] SSH DOS

Re: [WISPA] churn, double play and why WLP is key - I finally understand it

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
Interesting technique. I guess thats the beauty of having a CPE that will let us Tag traffic. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent:

Re: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet

2007-01-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
Take note that this problem that I am discussing with GB ethernet also may apply to GB wireless. I'm trying to determine if GB wireless needs to be the full path to be useful, or if its an adequate backhaul in specific areas. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

2007-01-07 Thread RickG
Another thing for my RD department! Thanks! -RickG On 1/7/07, Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote: This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll look into

RE: [WISPA] Fiar use policy

2007-01-07 Thread Joseph J. Cracchiolo
FAP's are needed because the industry sells an unlimited product for $30 to $50 per month which is simply not economically feasible if everyone really ran their connections 24x7. In other words, we trained the consumer incorrectly. IMHO, we will be seeing more and more FAP's as video over the

Re: [WISPA] Well, it was time to stir the pot for the new year...

2007-01-07 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Yeah, what he said. Al to often people tend to fall into the trap that their way is the only way. And in THEIR back yard, it's probably very true. But we don't all live in the same yard. One of the great things about this business is it's flexibility! DSL works basically one way.