Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

2008-11-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Could be. There's certainly a lot to remember Either way, we do need to stay involved with the issue to the degree that we can. marlon - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:50 PM

[WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed under 2ghz

2008-11-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Hi All, After seeing the comment about 100mhz of unlicensed in the TVBD RO I decided to ask some questions. I thought you guys might enjoy this exchange. It's a bummer that John's going to retire. He wrote much of the part 15 rules that we operate under and has been a source of many answers

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed under 2ghz

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
Perhaps John wants a job working part time for WISPA? - Original Message - From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:06 AM Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

2008-11-20 Thread John Valenti
see Antenna Requirements on page 101. Fixed device transmit antenna limited to MAX 30 meters high, also the receive antenna must be MIN 10 meter high. On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Jack Unger wrote: I don't think Fresnel is going to be too much of a problem. Which page did you pick up that

[WISPA] Thank you John Reed

2008-11-20 Thread John Scrivner
John Reed, I own a WISP operation in Southern Illinois called Mt. Vernon. Net, Inc. http://www.mvn.net/. I just want to drop you a thank you note for your work that has helped build an industry in the United States. I worked with Marlon Schafer and hundreds of others to help create the WISPA trade

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

2008-11-20 Thread Mike Hammett
I don't see how what I said was any different than what Blair said, nor how what Blair said was any indication of using something that wouldn't be approved. If the rules are the same as the rules in other bands, once you have a 15 dBi yagi certified with whatever radio you have, all yagis

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Randy Cosby
We recently visited a solar-powered site that had a supplementary wind-generation system. Seemed to work well for them to have wind power when the weather is bad, solar when it is good. Pretty windy place as well. Chuck McCown - 3 wrote: Here is a note I posted several days ago on the

Re: [WISPA] TVBD height requirement

2008-11-20 Thread Mike Hammett
I don't know where I got that from now. It must have been related to reading 60+ pages of that report that day. Must have read into something dealing with MPE that wasn't really there. For those of you interested in reading it, the only important parts, really, are pages 100 - 112... and

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
That is a grey area. Not all 15 dBi yagis are created equal. They all have differen S11 parameters. And S11 can cause a load pull of a transmitter causing different out of band signal components. That is why you will see a list of approved antennas. Including yagis. However there is the part

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
They must not be subject to ice storms. - Original Message - From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont We recently visited a solar-powered site that had a

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Randy Cosby
Good point :) It's not too severe down here in So Utah. Randy Chuck McCown wrote: They must not be subject to ice storms. - Original Message - From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:22 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
Wind generators are good if you have plenty of wind and no ice. Our problem has been that we need their power during the worst weather. And that is when they fail. They wear out or get loaded with ice and tear apart. - Original Message - From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA

[WISPA] Fwd: Thank you John Reed

2008-11-20 Thread John Scrivner
Here is John Reed's reply. Cheers, Scriv -- Forwarded message -- From: John Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Thank you John Reed To: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's so rare that I receive outside thanks here that I hardly know how to

Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Thank you John Reed

2008-11-20 Thread Steve Barnes
Nice work Scriv. I am a short timer (2.5 years) as a WISP but having read hundreds of your comments and many others input on these WISPA lists and it has made my life a lot easier. I am glad that you have taken on helping this Org. I hope that someone has just as kind words for you when you

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread reader
Your panel sizing is right on, but you don't need that much battery cost. Golf Cart batteries, which are near 200 each, are more than enough for a 12 volt system. insert witty tagline here - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread reader
Lead acid batteries won't freeze unless discharged more than 50%. for winter, just insulate them well to shield them from severe temperature spikes and make sure you have more charging power than you need, and you're good to go. insert witty tagline here

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread reader
I have used a AIR-X for 4 years now. The blades are a composite plastic and the ice WILL NOT stick to them. I've been there when the pole supporting the generator had nearly an inch of ice on it and the antennas were all coated too thick to break off, and the genset blades were ice free.

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Mike Hammett
You're special, Chuck. :-p - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 2:07 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA]

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
feelin' da luv today (As some might suspect, I do have a passion for mountain-top solar and wind power, having had to risk human life on more than one occasion to keep things alive or restore service. $2000 helicopter rides after the storm blows through is also a good reason to get it right.

[WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
Not our building, but ours looked just like it. This is after a week of no possible way to access the site. And of course no sunlight for a week of storm. Then with panels being coated like this, no sunlight until you get up there to chop off the ice or do other things that are more effective.

[WISPA] chipping ice

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
attachment: deice crew.jpg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Scott Parsons
Thanks so much for the insight and great information. You just saved me having to make all those mistakes all over again. I was definitely undersizing the system and I'd bet most folks would tend to do that, trying to save costs. One more question: I read that solar panels will still output on

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
We can even detect a little charge due to moonlight. Clouds are such variable density it is hard to give a meaningful answer. Plus there are days that are scattered, broken and overcast cloud conditions. We typically see a 50% reduction of current when clouds pass over on the telemetry. If you

Re: [WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown
Yeah, we have three of those critters and sleds too. But during a hard storm, even the snow cats cannot make it. I wish we had the Tuckers. You guys made the right choice. I am the only one here that likes the red machines. We have the yellow machines. Last year the sheriff had to send

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Randy Cosby
I appreciate the fact that you not only have made the mistakes for us, but that you are willing to share the experiences instead of sitting back an snickering. Randy Chuck McCown wrote: feelin' da luv today (As some might suspect, I do have a passion for mountain-top solar and wind

[WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Joel White
Mark, Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share? Thanks, Message: 24 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type:

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

2008-11-20 Thread Jack Unger
Also the assumption that the TVWS rules are the same as the rules in the other bands is also a far, far stretch. The TVWS rules are clearly not same as the rules in the other bands, not by a long shot. Chuck McCown wrote: That is a grey area. Not all 15 dBi yagis are created equal. They all

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Matt Hardy
We put together a wiki entry for our customers that explains the entire process of 3.65GHz licensing, from applying for an FRN number, to obtaining a nationwide license, to registering each site location. Maybe this will help some of you guys too:

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Matt
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the 3.5GHz antennas. Two issues... 1. We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the new version XR3 - 3.7 which had

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Mark Nash
I really can't remember about throughput. This was really what the board would do, not the card. We felt it was the max that the board/card/snr could give which was encouraging as this is on a site that we've had a TON of 5 GHz noise. Our specific application had a much lower need than the

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread rabbtux rabbtux
Thanks for the great info Chuck! Almost made the trojan battery mistake. what exactly is the battery technology and brand you suggest? if I have a 5 watt system you suggest a 120W solar panel. Also 30 days or 360AH of usable capacity at 12V? Thanks for the clarification, and the pics that

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed under 2ghz

2008-11-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Yeah, no kidding! - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:16 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed under 2ghz Perhaps John wants a job working part time for WISPA? -

Re: [WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Dude Yucko You need this truck down there! http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/power_truck.htm marlon - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:51 PM Subject: [WISPA] one more Not our building, but ours

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread reader
Not yet. The process of getting the license was easy. The site registration was completely new to me and took quite some time. The FCC has a whole batch of terminology you may know nothing about. insert witty tagline here - Original Message -

Re: [WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Travis Johnson
That truck would never make it to that tower site... never ever. At least at some of our tower sites, imagine snow deep enough that the only thing that stops you from going clear over your head is your armpits. Imagine being able to dig down 12 feet and still not hit dirt. Then imagine the

Re: [WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
yeah, much different than here that's for sure. I still want a snowcat though! marlon - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:47 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] one more That truck would never make it to that tower

Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
http://www.enersysreservepower.com/documents/US-GPL-AM-003_0906.pdf Genesis pure lead EP or XE version will work down to -40. They are rated for 100% depth of discharge. Repeatedly. 400 times. And can come back from 100% discharge at -40 to be fully charged. They are good for 2 years sitting on

Re: [WISPA] one more

2008-11-20 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
We tried with a bulldozer one year. Never made it. One of our guys almost went over the edge of a switchback trying. We gave up, waited till the storm blew over and hired the helicopter. - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Thursday,