Re: [WISPA] Thoughts on AirMAX Conference - Chicago

Thanks for the post Robert. It is good to hear about what went on. Did you get a free rocket? Did they run out? -RickG On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Robert West wrote: > No one is posting anything about the UBNT conference > > For those who didn't attend, Founder and President of UBNT, Rob

Re: [WISPA] Thoughts on AirMAX Conference - Chicago

Hey, we're talking about Ubiquiti here. The passing out of the free Rockets was at the end and it was Mike in the corner of the room with a laptop looking up the name of each person who registered to be there and making sure the person asking for the Rocket matched. Of course, no organization wit

Re: [WISPA] Thoughts on AirMAX Conference - Chicago

Oh, forgot to add to the comment about the UBNT supply issue. Robert Pera said, after being forced to see the supply issue, that he had decided to cancel his plans to attend the other conferences and was going to spend that Time in Asia to push for the UBNT product manufacturers to increase his or

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I'll send one lucky winner $30 paypal if they can show me within a week the M series is 5.4 certified via an FCC document. On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:18:30PM -0400, Gino Villarini wrote: > Where? > > This is the FCC cert for the M5 Rocket > > http://tinyurl.com/yaolxlj > > its only certified f

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I've found that in noisy environments b works better. Just did a repair at a customer's site, 400 to 700k down, 2 to 3 megs upload. Switched from b/g to b only and no he gets a steady 4 megs both ways. Go figure. Mikrotik with xr2 card. Power set to 20dB with 13dB 120* hpol sector. About 25

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I know the mikrotik R52N card is.. I was so excited... Until I read closer. It's certified as a client device, but not as an AP. The AP has to do all the heavy DFS/TPC lifting :( Randy jp wrote: > I'll send one lucky winner $30 paypal if they can show me within a week > the M series is 5.4

Re: [WISPA] Multipath

2.4 gig. All products. I've found that g handles it better than b. But b handles interference better than g. Right tool, right job. 50% science, 62% black magic. Some days I really do love this business! grin marlon - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "WISPA General Lis

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

We are in the process of replacing all of our old 802.11b gear with 802.11g AP/CPE running on 10mhz channels.802.11g on 10mhz channels is a great solution, as it takes up less spectrum, has more interference resistance and delivers about 2x the speeds of standard 802.11b.In my experienc

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

So G makes sense for an upgrade or would the money be better spent on another technology such as mimo? -RickG On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > We are in the process of replacing all of our old 802.11b gear with > 802.11g AP/CPE running on 10mhz channels.    802.11g on

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

Curious note: Ubiquiti Nanostation 5 is 5.4 GHz certified in .br, which has similar requirements to FCC or ETSI certification on that band. My guess it's ETSI certified as well. I would welcome the $100 but my guess is Anatel certification don't qualify, so let's earn it the old way. Rubens On

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

FCC has very strict rules in 5.4, very different from ETSI. Its all about special DFS requirements that are not met by regular DFS implementation on the rest of the world Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I swore I saw a document on the FCC's site saying it was, but I cannot find it any more. UBNT has submitted everything to the FCC, just waiting for the final approval. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com --

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I think you guys know most of this already, but here is my take FWIW. I'm not a WISP, but I spent 5 years leading the design and development of an 802.11[agb] security system. We did our own polling solution based on 802.11e HCCA to solve the RTS/hidden node problem. All things being equal (whi

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

I am reading your response and can not decipher all your algorithms? Point that out and I will have a much more understanding of what you are scientifically trying to say. Most WISPS have absolutely no scientific background! John -- Original Message -- F

Re: [WISPA] To G or not to G :-)

Yep it's too bad that many wireless ISPs have no interest in learning about wireless. Scottie Arnett wrote: I am reading your response and can not decipher all your algorithms? Point that out and I will have a much more understanding of what you are scientifically trying to say. Most WISPS