Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Mike Hammett
Client on east AP interfering with west AP. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday,

[WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Bob Moldashel
Anyone have any suggestions for a cheap switch I can plug 10 gig GBIC into and use for testing new 5 and 10 GiGE radios with.  Looking for used, ugly, bulky, etc. Most of all looking for cheap.  Strictly testing. Not real world environment. Tnx Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Nick Bright
On 3/21/2017 1:55 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: > Anyone have any suggestions for a cheap switch I can plug 10 gig GBIC > into and use for testing new 5 and 10 GiGE radios with. Looking for > used, ugly, bulky, etc. Most of all looking for cheap. Strictly > testing. Not real world environment. > >

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Jon Langeler
It can happen. I recommend using maybe an omni for the VERY close in customers or a second 'radio layer' for the close in...Like 50'-1500' Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Client on east AP interfering

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Jeremy Austin
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > I wouldn’t use in production, but I’ve got a few Quanta LB6M switches in > my lab. > > You can find them on ebay for 100-300 USD usually. > I concur with this. They're dirt cheap, but also don't support 1G SFPs.

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Sean Heskett
planet On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: > Anyone have any suggestions for a cheap switch I can plug 10 gig GBIC into > and use for testing new 5 and 10 GiGE radios with. Looking for used, ugly, > bulky, etc. Most of all looking for cheap.

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Chris J. Ruschmann
Cisco nexus 5010 on eBay is cheap and will IMHO get you better rates for your testing… From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 10:55 AM To: Wispa Subject: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch Anyone

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Eric Tykwinski
I wouldn’t use in production, but I’ve got a few Quanta LB6M switches in my lab. You can find them on ebay for 100-300 USD usually. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Tony C. Loosle
The UBNT model does work well, even if the firmware, as with all ubnt products is buggy. 10GB switch is not cheap. Netgear XS708E also works well. I have found a couple off ebay in the 4-450.00 range Nick Bright wrote: On 3/21/2017 1:55 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: Anyone have any

Re: [WISPA] 10 gig Switch

2017-03-21 Thread Carlos Alcantar
Cisco Catalyst (WS-C4948-10GE) should be able to do it. there 4948's are good utility switches they have dual ac/dc options and are fairly inexpensive. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 /

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Mark Radabaugh
We don’t see issues with F/B interference with 450 very often in 5.7 but it’s much more significant in 3.65. Typical issue will be poor SNR for the close-in customers even though they have excellent signal. Mark > On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: >

[WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Marco Coelho
Anyone want to offer a comparison of the different equipment listed. Cost, real throughput, Reliability, Customer Satisfaction, -- Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Inc. POB 875 Greenville, TX 75403-0875 903-455-5036 ___ Wireless mailing list

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 3/21/17 09:44, Marco Coelho wrote: > I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it > if there is freq overlap. Set the SM Receive Target Level to whatever is appropriate. ~Seth ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Josh Luthman
450m if revenue supports it. Epmp if not. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 21, 2017 12:12 PM, "Marco Coelho" wrote: > Anyone want to offer a comparison of the different equipment listed. > Cost, real

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Sean Heskett
it's a non issue. the 450m is designed in every way for high density, high capacity deployment. -sean On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Marco Coelho wrote: > I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it if > there is freq overlap. > > On Tue, Mar

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Marco Coelho
Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > 450m if revenue supports it. > > Epmp if not. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Josh Luthman
But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote: > > Those

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Matt
F/B ratio is critical when doing ABAB channel reuse even with sync. I imagine the 450m spec sheet states the F/B. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote: >> Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote: > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to > increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation? > The sectors hearing each other isn't really an issue with GPS sync since they will all TX at the same time. ~Seth

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

2017-03-21 Thread Marco Coelho
I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it if there is freq overlap. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote: > > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to > > increase