Re: [WISPA] deliberant/ligowave

2008-10-07 Thread Matt Hardy
based stats (receive signal level, noise level, etc). Best Regards,  Matt Hardy LigoWave WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

2008-11-14 Thread Matt Hardy
Hammett wrote: PPTP VPN connection. I'll see what is supported in this regard. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions -- From: Matt Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:48 PM

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Matt Hardy
We put together a wiki entry for our customers that explains the entire process of 3.65GHz licensing, from applying for an FRN number, to obtaining a nationwide license, to registering each site location. Maybe this will help some of you guys too:

Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link

2009-12-02 Thread Matt Hardy
It actually does take into account terrain data... Let us know if you have any other questions or suggestions for improvement. -Matt On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:29 -0700, 3-dB Networks wrote: One thing I have noticed... it does not take into account multipath, or really anything else dealing with

Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link

2009-12-02 Thread Matt Hardy
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:35 -0700, 3-dB Networks wrote: I must have missed the day Ligowave announced 11GHz can go through mountains :-) LOL... most 11GHz can't, only LigoWave. ;) We'll look into this and see what's going on with this link. Your calculator gives no indication of diffraction

Re: [WISPA] domain spam attack - JoeJob

2009-12-29 Thread Matt Hardy
You can implement the use of SPF records in your dns/mx settings. This will tell mail servers which use SPF checking (which many do) to only allow mail from your domain name to come from the mail servers / IPs that you specify (in the SPF records) are allowed. Any mail coming from non-allowed IPs

Re: [WISPA] domain spam attack - JoeJob

2009-12-29 Thread Matt Hardy
or something like that. Nick Olsen Brevard Wireless (321) 205-1100 x106 From: Matt Hardy Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:08 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] domain spam attack - JoeJob You

Re: [WISPA] OT - Glad I Didn't Buy an iPhone

2010-01-06 Thread Matt Hardy
There are quite a few Android based devices : I think I even saw a netbook yesterday that came preloaded with Android and XP setup in a dual-boot configuration. I had the G1 on TMobile, now have the HTC Hero. I've been happy with both, but now

Re: [WISPA] OT - Glad I Didn't Buy an iPhone

2010-01-06 Thread Matt Hardy
Hmm, nevermind I see the HTC emblem on the back of the phone on the website now. Another Android based HTC phone... The specs are interesting though. On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 19:26 -0500, Matt Hardy wrote: now I'm intrigued by the actual Google Phone made my Google :) The Nexus One Phone

Re: [WISPA] Mesh just for kicks

2009-02-19 Thread Matt Hardy
I think you're thinking of the MIT Roofnet project? :) Scottie Arnett wrote: I was thinking of something else...can't remember what is was called. A college was replacing the firmware in some Netgear WGR614L(best I recall) routers and meshing the

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Matt Hardy
Yes for the 3.65GHz band, antenna gain does matter, because the band is EIRP restricted. For instance, for the XR3, if you look on the grant: The maximum output (in

Re: [WISPA] email black lists

2009-06-30 Thread Matt Hardy
It could be senderbase: Have you checked your smtp logs for more detailed information? -Matt Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Hi All, We had a customer get a virus and it took us a couple of days to find out who it

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Router

2008-05-16 Thread Matt Hardy
Yes you can setup this feature in the Routes section for failover, you can create two routes with different Distances and have the lower distance route use the Check Gateway ping feature. If it quits pinging it will switch to the route with the higher distance setting. As far as load balancing,

Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?

2008-06-10 Thread Matt Hardy
- Original Message - From: Jason Hensley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput? Wes, Are these lab results or real-world? Matt (Hardy) has mentioned some similar speeds on some

Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

2008-06-11 Thread Matt Hardy
If you're looking at implementing VoIP with a system that's standards based, I'd try to find something that utilizes the Atheros Super G capabilities (WMM, Packet Bursting, Compression, Fast Frames). These can really help with VoiP in two main ways: WMM - A subset of 802.11e (QoS). Prioritizes

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

2008-06-13 Thread Matt Hardy
I guess one question would be is it a Layer 2 or Layer 3 mesh? That would influence what options you have. -Matt On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:43 -0700, Rogelio wrote: Rogelio wrote: I would like roaming, actually. Ideally, the entire mesh would be on the same LAN subnet and each user would

Re: [WISPA] XR9 separation from other 2.4 stuff

2008-06-13 Thread Matt Hardy
We've also collocated 2.4GHz and 900MHz radios using 2.4GHz frequency up/down converters in the same enclosure before without issues. The 900MHz radios implemented with the up/down converters have pretty good filters that block non-900MHz frequencies. On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 16:15 -0400, Leon

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

2008-06-15 Thread Matt Hardy
entries updated, etc For instance, if a laptop migrates from one mesh AP to a different mesh AP in L3, they will be assigned an IP in a different subnet, while with a Layer 2 mesh, they can use the same IP. -Matt On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:08 -0700, Charles N Wyble wrote: Rogelio wrote: Matt

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

2008-06-15 Thread Matt Hardy
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 20:52 -0400, Matt Hardy wrote: Yes a layer 2 mesh is protocol dependent, so you're stuck to IP traffic only. Oops... i mean, Layer 3 is protocol dependent :) Also, when using a layer 3 mesh, roaming and convergence time can also increase (slowing things down

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

2008-06-15 Thread Matt Hardy
and tunnel. Most l2 services provided by service providers are, in the end, tunneled over a layer 3 infrastructure. Scalabiity and stability are the 2 concerns of a service provider, and both are very weak at layer 2 of any size.. -Clint Ricker On Jun 15, 2008, at 21:00, Matt Hardy

Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtP equipment

2008-06-30 Thread Matt Hardy
Hi Randy, Yes, the LigoWave 900MHz products are all FCC certified. -Matt On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:26 -0600, Randy Cosby wrote: Is their 900 mhz stuff fcc certified? Randy Bo Ring wrote: LigoWave is planning one, but has not announced any details. This is from their website:

Re: [WISPA] theoretical mesh limits?

2008-07-15 Thread Matt Hardy
When you say dual radio... are you saying two radios devoted to the mesh layer, or one radio devoted to meshing and one devoted to client access? We have found in our tests that when two radios are devoted to meshing the results are a little higher than your results below. One test reports: GW


2010-08-24 Thread Matt Hardy
It sounds like a NAT issue to me... have you tried enabling GRE/PPTP/etc NAT helpers? you're using Mikrotik?) On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jeremie Chism

Re: [WISPA] no net but ping works

2010-08-26 Thread Matt Hardy
I agree... sounds like an arp issue. You don't happen to have two client bridges before this ap do you? If so you probably have customers battling each other in the arpnat tables. For instance one client starts pinging, other client stops working. Other client starts pinging, first stops working.

Re: [WISPA] UBNT RocketAC spotted on FCC site

2014-07-02 Thread Matt Hardy On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, wrote: I saw that as well. But again, if this is the Lite product, is there a higher level product to come, perhaps with GPS? Daniel Mullen ISN Inc.

Re: [WISPA] UBNT RocketAC spotted on FCC site

2014-07-02 Thread Matt Hardy
totally skipped over answering it... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Matt Hardy wrote: