Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal

2008-07-24 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Matt wrote: We have 60 mile Dragonwave systems out here. Saving 2-3K per month pays off a Dragonwave pretty quickly. How many Dragonwave hops? How much latency does it add in the end? We have done several 70 mile 2 hop backhauls with a variety of radios.

Re: [WISPA] 3650 FSS negotiations for protected areas...?

2008-07-28 Thread Matt Liotta
You can't use ULS for earth stations. Earth stations are covered by the international bureau as opposed to the wireless bureau. -Matt On Jul 27, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Doug Ratcliffe wrote: I've read your blogs and have been keeping up with them. What I can't seem to find is the ULS

Re: [WISPA] 3650 FSS negotiations for protected areas...?

2008-07-28 Thread Matt Liotta
filings? - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 FSS negotiations for protected areas...? You can't use ULS for earth stations. Earth stations are covered

Re: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire

2008-07-31 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:42 PM, John McDowell wrote: Without Sprint and Clearwire, WiMax has no chance at success, which leaves ATT and Verizon ( who will come into Rural Markets eventually) and their LTE plans. To not support Clearwire, is to support ATT and Verizon, two companies

Re: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire

2008-07-31 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jul 31, 2008, at 2:57 PM, John McDowell wrote: Sure, but only on a fixed basis. It is nothing compared to the International cellular market. If you look at the International Mobile WiMax footprint, its pretty dern small. Well you could say the same thing about fixed vs mobile 3G. I

Re: [WISPA] Network Monitor

2008-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
Maybe they aren't a vendor member and decided to share a resource that was relevant to the thread. Maybe they won't share on the next thread because of your response. Maybe neither of our messages should need to have been sent to the whole list. -Matt On Aug 1, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Jim

Re: [WISPA] 3650 FSS negotiations for protected areas...?

2008-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
I haven't looked at Appendix D in a while, but I don't think it takes into account topology. Ground works really well at stopping noise. -Matt On Aug 1, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Charles Wyble wrote: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote: Charles...As I found out, Appendix D is just ONE way to do those

Re: [WISPA] Redline indoor subscriber

2008-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 3:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Redline indoor subscriber We just got our hands on the recently approved 3650 indoor subscriber unit from Redline. It was quite a bit smaller than I thought, so I figured I

Re: [WISPA] Redline indoor subscriber

2008-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 3:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Redline indoor subscriber We just got our hands

Re: [WISPA] VoIP deployments?

2008-08-11 Thread Matt Liotta
Fax is a requirement and most certainly can work with VoIP. As we found out T.38 and G711 are mutually exclusive. T.38 is meant to work over G729 as G711 is supposed actually carry faxes successfully. -Matt On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Fax machines don't run over VoIP

Re: [WISPA] VoIP deployments?

2008-08-11 Thread Matt Liotta
G711 T.38 is a crapshoot. -Matt On Aug 11, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote: Which do you do successfully? G711 faxing or G729 w/ T.38? Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] VoIP deployments?

2008-08-11 Thread Matt Liotta
done G.711 and T.38 with many softswitches and many ATAs. It's too finicky. -- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, August 11

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
More importantly you need to have 256MB of line card memory on each card if you plan on running full tables. Make sure you get the GRP-B route processors with ECC memory. -Matt On Aug 12, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Dylan Bouterse wrote: Make sure you're getting more than 256MB of RAM if you're

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
I don't think it is possible to buy VXRs with the right engine to handle full tables that are cheaper than GSRs. -Matt On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote: Hi Gino, GSRs are overkill for what you are doing. In the Cisco world, a couple of mid-range VXRs would be a better

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
The only 6500/7600 that can support full tables requires a sup720-3bxl, which itself is much more expensive than a complete GSR. -Matt On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Bryan Scott wrote: You could also do a 6500 or 7600 with dual Supervisors power supplies. Mine carries full routes, dual GigE

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Scott Lambert wrote: What if you figure in the cost of a year or three of trying to feed the GSRs enough amps to keep them passing packets and enough amps to the air conditioner to keep them from melting? For us it is irrelevant. We would need a VXR with a

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers

2008-08-13 Thread Matt Liotta
7609 sup720-3bxl -Matt On Aug 12, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: Matt what you migrated to? gino -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:29 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers (for sale)

2008-08-13 Thread Matt Liotta
I figured I would mention. I have two GSRs (12008) that I am no longer using that support full tables etc. I am happy to sell them for $3k total or $1500 each. That is a no haggle below market price available to folks on this list. They are currently being sold by a 3rd party for $3k each.

Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers (for sale)

2008-08-13 Thread Matt Liotta
787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:11 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers (for sale) I figured I would mention. I have two GSRs (12008) that I

Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers!!!!

2008-08-26 Thread Matt Liotta
Yes, but you probably require a interconnect with the other carrier in order to port the number. More to the point, VOX probably is reselling Level3 or whoever that doesn't have an interconnect with the local LEC and therefore can't port. -Matt On Aug 26, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Chuck McCown

Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers!!!!

2008-08-26 Thread Matt Liotta
On Aug 26, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Ron Harden wrote: Yes, we source numbers from Level 3 and others. DID coverage is key to any successful digital voice program. There are some small mom-and-pop LECs that will not give up numbers because they a) don't want any competition, and b) don't

[WISPA] Best of WiMAX World

2008-09-09 Thread Matt Liotta
Voting is now open for the best of WiMAX World. It would be good PR if WISPA could recognize one of its members as the winner. And of course Rapid Link would appreciate it if you voted for us. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=1tQ1xOpQ_2bZi4ts6kn6WPrg_3d_3d -Matt

Re: [WISPA] Best of WiMAX World

2008-09-10 Thread Matt Liotta
, 2008, at 6:24 PM, John Scrivner wrote: I voted for you Matt. Good luck. I hope you will mention WISPA if you get it. All the best, John Scrivner On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Voting is now open for the best of WiMAX World. It would be good PR

[WISPA] Sprint-Nextel Severs Its Internet Connection to Cogent Communications

2008-10-31 Thread Matt Liotta
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/081030/neth134.html?.v=1 Watch out if you are single-homed to either. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] 3.65

2008-11-03 Thread Matt Liotta
There is already an SR3 card. I would HIGHLY suggest you test it throughly before deploying. -Matt On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: That would be great... but is there a time frame? Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: There are companies out there working on

Re: [WISPA] 3.65

2008-11-03 Thread Matt Liotta
We did test them. I would rather not share bad experiences on a public list. See you at ISPCON. -Matt On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: Matt, What does that mean? Have you tested it? Was it good or bad? Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: There is already an SR3

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Have we gotten any reports how 3650 works with foliage? 3650 sucks with foliage and more power doesn't help. Yeah it is that bad. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS with all things being equal. -Matt On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:42 AM, John Scrivner wrote: Our coverage looks like 2.4 GHz coverage in the same environment with the exception of much lower noise floor which helps extend link budgets

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
. Matt, I seem to remember a post from you recently where you were touting a link through 4 miles of tress with 3650. Was I not reading that correctly? Scriv On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We see on average 9dB less signal with 3650 than 2400 NLOS

Re: [WISPA] 3650 Foliage

2008-12-02 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Who said anything about using 802.16? ;-) I generally don't install a customer that has signal worse than -80. I want to maintain full modulation as best as possible. Can't expect to service too many customers if everyone has -88

Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering policies that require little to get a peering relationship. Some require specific amounts of traffic and/or multiple geographically diverse connections. Before you get your hopes up though I will warn you that connecting to

Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
://www.ics-il.com -- From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:52 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering policies

Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: *nods* I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago. Unfortunately they only have like 3 participants. Despite their lower participant numbers, I'm looking to join non- Equinix exchanges here in Chicago (Any2 and ChicagoIX). We

Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
AM, George Rogato wrote: Matt, how much is your bandwidth, say 100megs, in the Pittock? George Matt Liotta wrote: On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: *nods* I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago. Unfortunately they only have like 3 participants. Despite

Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
Check and see if you are running PVST, which runs spanning tree on each VLAN. -Matt On Dec 9, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: Ok... found the original problem... a few switches did not have the vlan setup in the vlan database. So the VLAN is up and working now... but the

Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
Just be careful if they want to do there own VLANs. If they do you will need to dot1q tunnel them. Cisco has made it easy in that all you have to do in addition to what you do now with a single VLAN is add the switchport dot1q tunnel command to their interface on either side. The VLAN

Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-10 Thread Matt Liotta
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 9:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help Just be careful if they want to do there own VLANs

Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-10 Thread Matt Liotta
... and creates a loop on VLAN150. Where do I start? I'm not sure what to even look for or how to troubleshoot this? Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: Check and see if you are running PVST, which runs spanning tree on each VLAN. -Matt On Dec 9, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Travis Johnson

Re: [WISPA] more Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Liotta
A diagram would really help. -Matt On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, I am still having a slight issue with a new setup of a Cisco VLAN. Here is how things are now: We have about 60 Cisco switches (3500 series) all connected together (one after another) in a giant

Re: [WISPA] more Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Liotta
... Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: A diagram would really help. -Matt On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, I am still having a slight issue with a new setup of a Cisco VLAN. Here is how things are now: We have about 60 Cisco switches (3500 series) all connected

Re: [WISPA] more Cisco VLAN help

2008-12-11 Thread Matt Liotta
could even check from switch to switch? Each switch is in a different customer location all over town, and would require one of my techs to go from location to location and plugging in and seeing if they can get out? Is there some other way to check? Travis Matt Liotta wrote: Does

[WISPA] business leads

2008-12-17 Thread Matt Liotta
I am looking for WISPs who can provide service in the following locations: Raleigh, NC 27606 Raleigh, NC 27612 Cary, NC 27519 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Mount Juliet, TN 37122 Franklin, TN 37067 Our customer is requesting a dedicated 3Mbps symmetrical service. We plan on delivering a wired T1 to

Re: [WISPA] wholesale bandwidth

2008-12-18 Thread Matt Liotta
Resellers play an important role in the overall ecosystem. However, as an industry we would be far better off if we bought from each other than from our competition. I believe that had CLECs worked with each other as opposed to trying to steal each other customers they might have made a

Re: [WISPA] Yikes, No Happy New years for SkyWi

2009-01-01 Thread Matt Liotta
These are not isolated incidents and affect many other companies even if it doesn't force them to shut down. Nevertheless, I predict we are going to see a number of companies with VoIP/LD exposure to go out of business this year. Both Qwest and Global Crossing have raised rates ~30% yet

Re: [WISPA] Yikes, No Happy New years for SkyWi

2009-01-01 Thread Matt Liotta
These are not isolated incidents and affect many other companies even if it doesn't force them to shut down. Nevertheless, I predict we are going to see a number of companies with VoIP/LD exposure to go out of business this year. Both Qwest and Global Crossing have raised rates ~30% yet

Re: [WISPA] OneConnectIP down

2009-01-01 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jan 1, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: If you port your number over, and that company goes out of business, you have a mess. :( That is not true. All regulated telecommunication companies are required to let your number port out except for a few specific reasons. What is more

Re: [WISPA] Congress may help smaller ISPs grow

2009-01-02 Thread Matt Liotta
If you are a leasing company why bother to extend leases to unknown entities when your current customers are already profitable and continue to expand their relationship? If I was the leasing company that Travis used I would be much more interested in providing another 100k to Travis than

Re: [WISPA] what should ARPU mean?

2009-01-05 Thread Matt Liotta
adding up all your gross revenues from the customers and dividing by the number of customers. I had never heard of anything different. What are you hearing? Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: We (the WISP industry) like to talk about ARPU a lot, but different organizations define ARPU

Re: [WISPA] OSPF Calculations

2009-11-25 Thread Matt Liotta
show ip route -Matt On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Scott Reed wrote: Does the lack of response mean there is no tool? Is this something WISPS would use if it were available? Scott Reed wrote: Does anyone have a tool you use to help determine OSPF link costs and track what you have set

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
History should be a guide; not a box. Our country has proven that our system of government and its attitude towards the free market is unmatched by any other system of government past or present. However, multinational corporations are something new that our system is having a hard time

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote: Not sure where you got this info Matt. I've seen just the opposite. In Mississippi they had lost most of the OB/GYN docs. They are now getting what they need since they enacted tort reform. You've seen or read the studies? Because

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Brad Belton wrote: Agreed. Tort reform will help save healthcare costs and enable more doctors to practice their trade. My doctor just shut down his practice of 20-30 years and let his entire staff go due to the cost of business growing out of control.

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote: From the NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/us/05doctors.html?_r=1 The article certainly shares some facts and anecdotes regarding the 2003 Texas tort reform. However, it doesn't point to any research that ties cause and effect.

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote: Kinda like when I was home schooled as a kid and my parents had to pay school taxes for public school? Only makes sense that we'd again pay twice for another public option. Good analogy. I don't think your parents had to pay twice. They

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Those other countries that have better health outcomes and a longer life expectancy have taken profit out of healthcare. Further, their doctors are smart and spent a lot of time and money going to medical as well. Most did it for the same reasons as doctors here. And many get paid well

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Blake Bowers wrote: If Cuba is so good, why do they rank below the US? Mostly likely because they are such a poor country and can't spend much money on healthcare. -Matt WISPA

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Blake Bowers wrote: You can't have it both ways. The survey (which is flawed, but it was brought up) says that Cuba rates below the US. Did you read how the numbers were come up with? I guess I don't understand how I am expecting it both ways. You asked why

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Exactly. Bernie Madoff went to jail because of his Ponzi scheme, why didn't FDR for social security? Well, other than the obvious of him dieing. Maybe you don't realize that Madoff fraudulently mislead investors whereas social security is

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
And I guess because you know someone from Canada/Britain/France/Spain/ etc that swears the healthcare is worse then they make it out to be and that the US is where everyone with money goes then it must be true. Let's all just ignore study after study that shows every single first world

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:56 PM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: Matt, Chill, you're taking a really harsh tone. I'm talking about Cuba because I know about that. I have many Latino friends. I speak Spanish. I know Cubans and I know a lot of people who have been to Cuba. You're putting

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
on this topic no matter what Matt says next. Greg On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Matt Liotta wrote: On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:56 PM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: Matt, Chill, you're taking a really harsh tone. I'm talking about Cuba because I know about that. I have many Latino friends. I

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:32 PM, MDK wrote: As I stated before... Medicare reimburses such low amounts, that ever doctor, hospital, clinic, lab, etc, that accepts it does so at a loss. Not just no profit but at a loss.Not only that, but Medicare has the highest level of financial

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:29 PM, MDK wrote: I'm sure you're a nice guy... But you're trying to convince a lot of people who know better by long years of experience, that life would be beautiful and all will be fine, if we just give Congress a few more trillion dollars a year of our hard

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:20 AM, MDK wrote: Every country with a government run medical system Denies routine medical care, extraordinary medical care, or expensive medical care on a routine basis. This is why babies delivered by the NHS hospitals in Britain are less than 90% born

Re: [WISPA] Insurance....

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
morally relieved of any personal responsibility for those who suffer for a lack, right? Or, are you going to tell us that government can buy unlimited health care for everyone? -- From: Matt Liotta mlio...@r337.com Sent: Tuesday, December 08

Re: [WISPA] Insurance thread- Matt and the rest

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:50 AM, rwf wrote: Matt- Please consider taking your insurance debate to another list. It is not my debate. I believe the list was discussing this for at least 3 days before I made my first post. When you pop in, you just make the discussion hotter and more active.

Re: [WISPA] Insurance thread- Matt and the rest

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
I am not longer with Rapid Link/One Ring as an employee, but I have not left the business. Ralph likes to speak out of turn. -Matt On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Brad Belton wrote: Matt's not in the business anymore? News to me. I thought he was with Rapid or Ring something or another?

Re: [WISPA] What the heck is Matt doing now?!? WAS: Re: Insurance

2009-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
? -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:08 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Insurance thread- Matt and the rest I am not longer with Rapid Link/One Ring

Re: [WISPA] Insurance thread- Matt and the rest

2009-12-10 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 9, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote: Matt, would you mind clarifying.When you said... have not the left the business, did you mean I don't mind clarifying, but I am not sure what the interest is. 1) Have not left OneRing/RapidLink, and are involved in a non-employee

Re: [WISPA] Insurance thread- Matt and the rest

2009-12-10 Thread Matt Liotta
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:29 AM, rwf wrote: Oh? So you are still a WISP then? What is your company called? Guess your filter still isn't working then. I am not a WISP and never have been. If you think you know something and would like to get yourself and others in trouble then by all means

[WISPA] stimulus announcements thus far

2009-12-17 Thread Matt Liotta
A $33.5 million grant to the North Georgia Network Cooperative for a fiber-optic ring that will bring high-speed Internet connections to the northern Georgia foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. The project will serve an eight-county area with a population of 334,000. A $25.4 million

Re: [WISPA] stimulus announcements thus far

2009-12-17 Thread Matt Liotta
See the highlighted projects here... http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/20091217-recovery-act-investments-broadband.pdf -Matt On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:20 PM, David E. Smith wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 13:24, Robert West robert.w...@just- micro.comwrote: So how did it get

Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear - licensed bands btw

2009-12-31 Thread Matt Liotta
Many of those licenses had serious restrictions, which is why the auction reverse was so low in the first place. -Matt On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Charles Wu wrote: Speaking of which, did anyone notice the results of the latest BRS Auction (#86) Licenses went for an average of $0.03 /

Re: [WISPA] BGP Load Balancing Help

2010-01-17 Thread Matt Liotta
Prepending is no longer the desirable solution and should only be used if your upstreams don't support a better way. The preferred way is to adjust local preference based on a route policy. You can simply prefer your fiber circuit if you want or adjust it on an AS basis. You will likely only

Re: [WISPA] Multi-Point MMW- was Ceragon, Dragonwave and whatelse?

2009-01-19 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jan 19, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Charles Wu (CTI) wrote: 3. No -- while you *could* do PtMP -- problem is antenna beamwidth requirements (and interference protection minimums) Use the side lobes Luke. -Matt

Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Redline BH

2009-01-23 Thread Matt Liotta
These are not officially available yet. Hence the lack of information. I have a pair at our office for testing if anyone wants to swing by. Unfortunately, I can't share any results at this point. -Matt On Jan 23, 2009, at 8:12 AM, 3-dB Networks wrote: Does anyone have the spec sheet? I

Re: [WISPA] Need 18ghz link

2009-02-11 Thread Matt Liotta
Trango has a way of destroying their reputation even when their product is not at fault. We've had them offer us volume discounts only later to see the same price offered without a volume requirement as part of a promotion. I can't get a modern firmware for our older 5010s that operate in

Re: [WISPA] Need 18ghz link

2009-02-11 Thread Matt Liotta
On Feb 11, 2009, at 5:02 PM, John Seaman wrote: Matt, there is no DFS detector in the Atlas5010. It was not a firmware issue, but rather a hardware limitation. That is why we released the 5055, aka the TrangoLINK-45 which is essentially the same product as the Atlas but has DFS support

Re: [WISPA] Need 18ghz link

2009-02-12 Thread Matt Liotta
On Feb 12, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: And, CTI has published their exact pricing for the Trango. Why is nobody else putting out the DW price? I don't know, but our last quote from CTI had the DW coming in less than Trango. -Matt

[WISPA] broadband underserved data

2009-02-12 Thread Matt Liotta
Where can I obtain broadband underserved data? -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List:

Re: [WISPA] broadband underserved data

2009-02-12 Thread Matt Liotta
database would work nicely for that. Thank You, Brian Webster -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:10 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] broadband underserved data

Re: [WISPA] broadband underserved data

2009-02-12 Thread Matt Liotta
://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html Rick -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:36 PM To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] broadband underserved

[WISPA] make sure you are filtering AS48438 right now

2009-02-16 Thread Matt Liotta
WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] make sure you are filtering AS48438 right now

2009-02-16 Thread Matt Liotta
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 12:18 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] make sure you are filtering AS48438 right now

Re: [WISPA] make sure you are filtering AS48438 right now

2009-02-16 Thread Matt Liotta
On Feb 16, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Jeff Broadwick wrote: So if your BGP upstream is using a old firmware and passed you this bogus path data your BGP session with them would flap. That is not correct. Older firmwares were dropping sessions because of this. Regardless, the route in question

Re: [WISPA] Dallas/Irving

2009-02-24 Thread Matt Liotta
http://www.rapidlink.com/images/dallas.png -Matt On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Cameron Kilton wrote: I was down visiting some relatives in Irving, TX and noticed a few Trango units kicking around, anyone covering that area, just curios to who it is. Cameron Midcoast Internet

Re: [WISPA] grant funds ideas

2009-03-03 Thread Matt Liotta
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: I can't believe that NO ONE here has any input on this at all. Did my last post fail to make it through? Or should we not give any input into the process if given the chance? We'll just let the telco's get all of it then? It

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Matt Liotta
There is also have a difference between accepted interpretations and trying to argue new interpretations. I would say you an attorney if you want to push through a new interpretation. While it may be supported in current law, unless there is a precedent then you are going to have to argue

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Liotta
Yes, but the UBNT 3.65 radios are crap. Everyone we tried was worthless. On the other hand, every Redline 3.65 radio whether RedMax or AN80 has worked perfect. -Matt On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Wow. I have 200 UBNT radios out there and not a single failure, not

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-19 Thread Matt Liotta
We are seeing around $500 ARPU and on average 6 customers deployed per 7Mhz channel with our RedMax basestations. I see no reason to complain. -Matt On Mar 19, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Good efficiencies, not enough throughput per channel, however. In one thread in one list

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-19 Thread Matt Liotta
-- From: Matt Liotta mlio...@r337.com Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:39 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ? We are seeing around $500 ARPU and on average 6 customers deployed per 7Mhz channel with our RedMax

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-19 Thread Matt Liotta
On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Chuck Bartosch wrote: However, that (obviously) means it's not particularly viable in many situations where you don't see enough customers to support a wimax base station. But because 3.65 with diversity is supposed to deliver NLOS performance similar to or

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-19 Thread Matt Liotta
I think you may be missing a couple of variables in the multivariable equation that determines the actual throughput a client can achieve in a given time slice. When comparing access systems one must understand the differences between the capabilities provided by the systems and their

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-20 Thread Matt Liotta
11Mbps at 18 miles. Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: Yes, but the UBNT 3.65 radios are crap. Everyone we tried was worthless. On the other hand, every Redline 3.65 radio whether RedMax or AN80 has worked perfect. -Matt On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Wow. I have

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-20 Thread Matt Liotta
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: 2 megs is yesterday's news. U-Verse is 18/1.5 FiOS is 50/20 Charter has 60/5 Comcast has 50/10 2 megs is 36 times faster than 56k. Charter is 30 times faster than that. Why is the wireless world happy with being 10 years behind the

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-20 Thread Matt Liotta
Might want to get a license for that. -Matt On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: I have a single 3.65 Mikrotik system (RB411 with XR3-3.7 cards) feeding three remote towers. Rock solid. 60+ days now. 11Mbps. 18 miles. Travis Microserv Matt Liotta wrote: According

Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?

2009-03-20 Thread Matt Liotta
On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:50 PM, rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote: Mike Hammett and I both are watching huge amounts of investment being poured into WIMAX equipment that's designed to meet last year's bandwidth model and asking the same question.When are the WIMAX folks going to

Re: [WISPA] Wireless Ethernet

2009-03-25 Thread Matt Liotta
You want a pseudowire appliance that creates a T1 across an Ethernet link. Rad, Telco, and Dragonwave all make good products at reasonable prices. I have some extra ones if you want a deal. -Matt On Mar 25, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: I have a customer who wants to use our towers

Re: [WISPA] Sprint Wholesale

2009-04-20 Thread Matt Liotta
Mike Tataris Specialized Account Manager - WSG Phone: 404-649-1521 Cell: 678-478-9132 Fax: 800-329-6882 Email: mike.tata...@sprint.com On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Does anyone have a contact at Sprint wholesale. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions

Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors

2009-04-22 Thread Matt Liotta
Those of us operators who actually have experience in the field with the gear tend to avoid posting to threads about WiMAX because the threads quickly devolve. I suggest you read the archives of this mailing list. To summarize though; operators who use WiMAX like it and think the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >