Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Link Loss

Guys, I think you have a classic case of multipath fading. The things to check are: 1. Is there enough fade margin to achieve the desired availability (99.98% - 99.998%)? 2. Is the first Fresnel Zone blocked 40% at K = 4/3? 3. Is the reflection point as close to one end as possible? Is it

Re: [WISPA] Interference on 11GHz

Give a spectrum management company (Comsearch, WAC etc) your site info and have them do an interference search. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM To:

[WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless

and/or information about the new concept of concurrent coordination, please contact me at Wireless Strategies 831-659-5618 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional information you can also visit our web site at www.wirelessstrategies.net. Thanks, Mike Michael Mulcay, CEO Wireless Strategies, Inc

RE: [WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless

PROTECTED] www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: michael mulcay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:23 PM Subject: [WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless Guys, As we wireless operators know, the costs

RE: [WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless

network if we get the go ahead to do so. Many thanks, John Scrivner michael mulcay wrote: Concurrently coordinated networks are Licensed Carrier Grade, which means we no longer have to take second place to the big guys. Wireless Strategies Inc (WSI) decided to focus on carrier grade backhaul where

[WISPA] FCC Public Notice

Last week the FCC1 issued a Public Notice seeking comments on Wireless Strategies request for a declaratory ruling regarding (concurrent) coordination of microwave links under Part 101 of the Commission's rules. The amount of microwave spectrum is finite and it is in everyone's interest to seek

RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice

apreciated. Felix Wireless Practioneer --- michael mulcay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last week the FCC1 issued a Public Notice seeking comments on Wireless Strategies request for a declaratory ruling regarding (concurrent) coordination of microwave links under Part 101 of the Commission's rules

RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice

will want to be installing 6' dishes on people's houses... -Charles --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael mulcay Sent

[WISPA] FCC Public Notice

For those interested in WSI's request to the FCC for a declaratory ruling, there is additional information on the web site (www.wirelessstrategies.net http://www.wirelessstrategies.net/ ) under FCC Public Notice. Mike

Re: [WISPA] Couple more questions for the 11Ghz folks

Scott, For a 30 mile path in Florida with a 40dB fade margin the outage is predicted to be in excess of 20 hours. About 12 miles is the max I would use. Mike 831-659-5618 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Carullo

Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question

Adaptive modulation is the subject of an FCC NPRM WT Docket 10-153. Can you lock the equipment in a non adaptive mode? Mike Wireless Strategies Inc 831-601-0086 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Carullo Sent: Thursday, January 06,

Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question

: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question At 1/13/2011 02:40 PM, Michael Mulcay wrote: ... The FCC committee was correct as spectrum is the life blood of all WISPs and conservation of spectrum is absolutely essential. Of course. I read your presentation, and some of the Reply

Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question

Larsen - Lists Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:43 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question Wow Michael, That was an outstanding post. Thank you for taking the time to put it together. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 1/13/2011 11:31 PM, michael mulcay

Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question

] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:41 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question At 1/14/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Mulcay wrote: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0013_01CBB371.AEA7F3F0 Content

[WISPA] FCC NPRM WT Docket 10-153

In my experience, significant growth opportunities occur in wireless when there is a regulatory change, a technology change, or both. The last major opportunity in backhaul and access occurred in the 1990's when, as stated in a previous post, Western Multiplex Corporation petitioned the FCC for a

Re: [WISPA] FCC NPRM WT Docket 10-153

, criticisms or supportive statements. Respectfully, Rick Harnish Executive Director WISPA 260-307-4000 cell 866-317-2851 WISPA Office Skype: rick.harnish. rharn...@wispa.org From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of michael mulcay Sent

Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question

here to debate these issues. I have been a proponent for concurrent coordination as proposed by Michael Mulcay for a few years now. Michael did an eloquent job of proposing these ideas before the WCAI around 2005 maybe? I was in the audience. The licensed players there did not really see anything