Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-09 Thread John Scrivner
I do not have the link to the proceeding but t is known as 04-186 and a quick Google should get you to it. It is on the FCC.gov website someplace. Anyone have a link to it? The power limits are spelled out there I believe. The public process on 04-186 is complete now. We will have what we

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-09 Thread John J. Thomas
, 2006 08:33 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum] I do not have the link to the proceeding but t is known as 04-186 and a quick Google should get you to it. It is on the FCC.gov website someplace. Anyone have a link to it? The power limits are spelled out

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread Dawn DiPietro
All, I guess at this point I am at a loss of words. The original press release with contact info was posted in my first email. Did the contact person at the TIA ever get back to you about the press release? What should be done in the future to avoid a situation like this? I was under the

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread John Scrivner
Thanks Dawn. I was in a bit of a panic when I asked for the contact info for the fist press release. I went back and re-read your post after that and contacted the TIA press agent directly. I copied this list on that message asking for them to correct the information. Thanks all and so sorry,

RE: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread Rick Harnish
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 10:58 AM To: WISPA General List Cc: Frannie Wellings Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum] Thanks Dawn. I was in a bit of a panic when I asked for the contact info for the fist press release. I went

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread Dawn DiPietro
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 10:58 AM To: WISPA General List Cc: Frannie Wellings Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum] Thanks Dawn. I was in a bit of a panic when I asked for the contact info for the fist press release. I went back and re-read your

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread John J. Thomas
: [WISPA] TV spectrum] We have a problem. It appears the press release we read earlier was wrong. Attached is the exact language of the bill. It is asking for ALL tv channels except for one small band. I do not know what is wrong with that one channel but this is actually a VERY GOOD bill. I am

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread John J. Thomas
Thanks for the link, it seemed kind of strange why that little slice of 6 MHz was left out. John -Original Message- From: Dawn DiPietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2006 06:43 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum] All, I guess

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-08 Thread Dylan Oliver
Has there been any word on what the power limitations in the whitespace band will be? Or is this up to the FCC when the bills pass? I wish the band was WISP-only, and registered like 3650 to keep things proper. Thanks, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

[Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-07 Thread John Scrivner
We have a problem. It appears the press release we read earlier was wrong. Attached is the exact language of the bill. It is asking for ALL tv channels except for one small band. I do not know what is wrong with that one channel but this is actually a VERY GOOD bill. I am sorry for the mix up.

Re: [Fwd: RE: [WISPA] TV spectrum]

2006-04-07 Thread Anthony Will
Well below is the copy of the apologies I sent to my congressman. I'm posting it here to just give everyone some cut and paste materials NOT to admonish Mr. Scrivner. You acted with best intentions at heart and are obviously passionate about this industry. Thank you for your initiative