Thanks for all of the feedback.
For clarification, the LMR400 cable was 140
feet and was the only cable that connected the analyzer to the antenna.
I am familiar with the IDU and ODU
configuration of the Redline equipment.
This test was to see what 5.8 RF was
present. The
I think what you thought was RG6 was actually RG59 - Redline is a pretty clean platform so I don't think too many issues will arise from the deployment of that platform in your area.
JohnnyO
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 07:31 -0600, Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
Thanks for all of the feedback.
AUGH!
This whole thread..
Some have touched on pieces of it but how about this summary..
The Redline is a two piece radio. It does not send 5 Ghz up the cable.
It sends an IF frequency which is lower and more forgiving as well as
power to operate the outdoor unit. The
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
AUGH!
This whole thread..
Some have touched on pieces of it but how about
Dustin Jurman wrote:
If the spectrum analyzer is left in place for a period of time and setup
with peak hold you will quickly find that radio that is used at the end of
the day. It still speaks, handshakes and more.
I don't know about you but I'm not about to leave a spectrum analyzer
I think you hit the nail on the headBob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AUGH!This whole thread..Some have touched on pieces of it but how about this summary..The Redline is a two piece radio. It does not send 5 Ghz up the cable. It sends an IF frequency which is lower and
Infrastructure!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Dustin Jurman wrote:
If the spectrum analyzer is left in place
topic.
- Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dustin Jurman
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:42 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Takes no more than a few minutes to perform a peak hold Bob
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Dustin Jurman wrote:
If the spectrum analyzer is left in place for a period of time and setup
with peak hold you will quickly find that radio that is used at the end
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
Dustin, thanks for the encouraging support of my efforts.
Since we have been hired for part of this project, I believe it is my
RESPONSIBILITY to point out any known issues to the customer; and, it is
my responsibility to back up my concerns with hard date, not just 'my
General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:01 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
If the spectrum analyzer is left in place for a period of time and setup
with peak hold you will quickly find that radio that is used at the end
of
the day
- Original Message -
From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
Dustin, thanks for the encouraging support of my efforts
Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
Dustin, thanks for the encouraging support of my efforts.
Since we have been hired for part of this project, I believe it is my
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob Moldashel wrote:
Dustin Jurman wrote:
If the spectrum analyzer is left in place for a period of time and setup
with peak hold you will quickly find that radio that is used at the end of
the day. It still speaks, handshakes and more.
I don't know
10, 2006 8:44
AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum
Analysis (I think!)
I think what you thought was RG6 was actually RG59 - Redline is
a pretty clean platform so I don't think too many issues will arise from the
deployment of that platform in your area.JohnnyOOn Fri,
2006-02-10
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed with a hand-held spectrum analyzer at the height that the
equipment was to be mounted. Our offer was rejected.
However, we were asked to provide the climber for the other party's
analysis.
Their analysis was
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed with a hand-held spectrum analyzer at the height that the
equipment was to be mounted. Our offer was rejected.
However, we were asked
Gino,
It was Redline's 2' panel.
- Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:15 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
What redline antenna
] On
Behalf Of Cliff Leboeuf
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
Gino,
It was Redline's 2' panel.
- Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent
, 2006 8:07 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed with a hand-held spectrum analyzer at the height that the
equipment was to be mounted. Our offer was rejected.
However, we were asked to provide
There was no noise detected b/c there was no signal going into the SPEC-AN ! - This sounds like something you would do Cliff - sure this guy wasn't related to you ?
JohnnyO
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 10:07 -0600, Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flawed
Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
There was no noise detected b/c there was no signal going into the
SPEC-AN ! - This sounds like something you would do Cliff - sure this guy
wasn't related to you ?
JohnnyO
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 10:07 -0600, Cliff Leboeuf wrote
With 140 ft of LMR-400 at 5.8GHz, the loss is about 15db. With a good
antenna topside, you might get some usable results, but not good
ones
For the RG6, I can't find any loss specs for freq. above 900MHz. At
900MHz, the loss is about 10db for 140 ft. Extrapolating that to
5.8GHz, I
:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed with a hand-held spectrum analyzer at the height that the
equipment was to be mounted. Our offer was rejected.
However, we were asked
Another thought is maybe it was alvarion gear or some thing similar that
uses a frequency converter at the antenna.
I think they get fed with a small cable.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Cliff Leboeuf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed
26 matches
Mail list logo
