Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread Ron Wallace
I just looked and there were 240 listed at 8:50 EDT 
10/05/05.  My comments were not there, in fact I didn't see 
anyones that I recognized.  Only about 10-20 listed since 
n9/1/05.

 Original message 
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 
go!  
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186

George

Tony Weasler wrote:
 Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 
first filing
 I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 
from
 COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.
 
 The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 
you send to
 the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 
with the
 correct information.
 
 Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 
they filed
 should check to see if your filing is still there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N
 
  - Tony
 
 P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 
1/1/05 are
 marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 
or STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 
erased as
 well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 
a STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 
search
 results.  Should we be filing notices instead?
 
 
 On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
 
Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 
day after we
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 
responses and
my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 
response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:


I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 
clear message
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 
unused
television channel space. Your messages are going to be 
heard.  04-186
is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition
from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 
do not want
anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the
FCC that you need those unused television channels to 
help grow your
business and serve those hard to reach customers then 
please do so
now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 
the blanks
with your contact information. Use the guide below for 
specific lines
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 
correctly.

1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 
name which I
will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 
channels for
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 
FCC. Just tell
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 
correct
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 
only one
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 
industry on this
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 
comments in
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 
ruling.

Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 
pass this on if
you are.



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread Ron Wallace
Guys,
try this URL:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts

i found 351 entries, however, there were only 127 since 
9/12/05.  Only 49 entries in Oct. 2005.  Mine was there, I 
did not see Georges, in fact there was short note begging 
George not send more.

Ron Wallace

 Original message 
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 
go!  
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186

George

Tony Weasler wrote:
 Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 
first filing
 I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 
from
 COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.
 
 The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 
you send to
 the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 
with the
 correct information.
 
 Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 
they filed
 should check to see if your filing is still there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N
 
  - Tony
 
 P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 
1/1/05 are
 marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 
or STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 
erased as
 well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 
a STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 
search
 results.  Should we be filing notices instead?
 
 
 On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
 
Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 
day after we
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 
responses and
my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 
response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:


I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 
clear message
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 
unused
television channel space. Your messages are going to be 
heard.  04-186
is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition
from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 
do not want
anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the
FCC that you need those unused television channels to 
help grow your
business and serve those hard to reach customers then 
please do so
now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 
the blanks
with your contact information. Use the guide below for 
specific lines
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 
correctly.

1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 
name which I
will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 
channels for
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 
FCC. Just tell
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 
correct
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 
only one
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 
industry on this
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 
comments in
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 
ruling.

Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 
pass this on if
you are.



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread George

Glad you found the list.
But I'm confused on how many are valid or not and did we do something wrong.

George


Ron Wallace wrote:

Guys,
try this URL:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts

i found 351 entries, however, there were only 127 since 
9/12/05.  Only 49 entries in Oct. 2005.  Mine was there, I 
did not see Georges, in fact there was short note begging 
George not send more.


Ron Wallace

 Original message 


Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 


go!  


To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-


bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186


George

Tony Weasler wrote:

Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 


first filing

I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 


from


COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.

The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 


you send to

the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 


with the


correct information.

Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 


they filed


should check to see if your filing is still there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-


bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N


- Tony

P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 


1/1/05 are

marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 


or STATEMENT

FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 


erased as

well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 


a STATEMENT

FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 


search


results.  Should we be filing notices instead?


On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:



Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 


day after we

sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 


responses and


my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 


response missing?


George


John Scrivner wrote:



I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 


clear message

to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 


unused

television channel space. Your messages are going to be 


heard.  04-186

is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 


opposition

from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 


do not want

anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 


already told the

FCC that you need those unused television channels to 


help grow your

business and serve those hard to reach customers then 


please do so


now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 


the blanks

with your contact information. Use the guide below for 


specific lines

to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 


correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 


name which I


will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 


channels for

broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 


FCC. Just tell

them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 


correct

spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 


only one

sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 


industry on this

NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 


comments in

support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 


ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 


pass this on if


you are.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message to 
the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused television 
channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  04-186 is key to 
the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition from the NAB 
(National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want anyone else 
playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the FCC that you 
need those unused television channels to help grow your business and 
serve those hard to reach customers then please do so now. Here are the 
instructions once again:


GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines to 
help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I will 
assume you guys have covered. :-)


Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct spelling, 
be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one sentence. I want 
to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this NPRM over the next 5 
days. Let's bury them in so many comments in support of this NPRM that 
the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if 
you are.

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread George

Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we 
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and 
my response can not be found.

Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:
I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message to 
the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused television 
channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  04-186 is key to 
the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition from the NAB 
(National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want anyone else 
playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the FCC that you 
need those unused television channels to help grow your business and 
serve those hard to reach customers then please do so now. Here are the 
instructions once again:


GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines to 
help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I will 
assume you guys have covered. :-)


Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct spelling, 
be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one sentence. I want 
to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this NPRM over the next 5 
days. Let's bury them in so many comments in support of this NPRM that 
the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if 
you are.


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my first filing
I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it from
COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.

The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that you send to
the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it with the
correct information.

Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought they filed
should check to see if your filing is still there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186start=1end=2000first_time=N

 - Tony

P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 1/1/05 are
marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT or STATEMENT
FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being erased as
well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as a STATEMENT
FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the search
results.  Should we be filing notices instead?


On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
 Funny thing is I filled this one out.
 I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we
 sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and
 my response can not be found.
 Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?
 
 George
 
 
 John Scrivner wrote:
 
 I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message
 to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused
 television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  04-186
 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition
 from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want
 anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the
 FCC that you need those unused television channels to help grow your
 business and serve those hard to reach customers then please do so
 now. Here are the instructions once again:

 GO RIGHT NOW TO:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

 A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks
 with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines
 to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.

 1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
 2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
 4) and 5) Leave Blank
 11) Check Late Filed check box.
 12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

 The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I
 will assume you guys have covered. :-)

 Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for
 broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell
 them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct
 spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one
 sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this
 NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in
 support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.

 Thanks guys,
 Scriv

 PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if
 you are.
 
 
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread George

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186

George

Tony Weasler wrote:

Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my first filing
I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it from
COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.

The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that you send to
the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it with the
correct information.

Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought they filed
should check to see if your filing is still there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186start=1end=2000first_time=N

 - Tony

P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 1/1/05 are
marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT or STATEMENT
FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being erased as
well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as a STATEMENT
FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the search
results.  Should we be filing notices instead?


On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:


Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and
my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:



I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused
television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  04-186
is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition
from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want
anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the
FCC that you need those unused television channels to help grow your
business and serve those hard to reach customers then please do so
now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.

1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I
will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.

Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if
you are.





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
WOW!   I just checked it out. Guys, we are up to 351 comments right now 
on 04-186! I bet 95% are from WISPS. You guys rock! We were at 315 this 
morning. You guys are amazing me here. We might actually get 500 
comments on this. If we did I think the FCC would have serious trouble 
denying us our use of these bands. I mean come on. 500 comments asking 
for something they were about ready to give us anyway? How could they 
say no? You guys are the best!

Scriv


George wrote:


Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we 
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and 
my response can not be found.

Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:

I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message 
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused 
television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  
04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do 
not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels 
to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers 
then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again:


GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines 
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I 
will assume you guys have covered. :-)


Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct 
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one 
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this 
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in 
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on 
if you are.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Rick Harnish
Jory Privett forwarded John's message to the FISPA list as well.  There has
been numerous responses today from FISPA.  Thanks Jory!

Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband  Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 2:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

Here is a little help from Alex Goldman at isp-lists:
http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/politics/2005/wispa_fcc_bol.html

George

John Scrivner wrote:
 WOW!   I just checked it out. Guys, we are up to 351 comments right now 
 on 04-186! I bet 95% are from WISPS. You guys rock! We were at 315 this 
 morning. You guys are amazing me here. We might actually get 500 
 comments on this. If we did I think the FCC would have serious trouble 
 denying us our use of these bands. I mean come on. 500 comments asking 
 for something they were about ready to give us anyway? How could they 
 say no? You guys are the best!
 Scriv
 
 
 George wrote:
 
 Funny thing is I filled this one out.
 I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we 
 sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and 
 my response can not be found.
 Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

 George


 John Scrivner wrote:

 I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message 
 to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused 
 television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  
 04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
 opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do 
 not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
 already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels 
 to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers 
 then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again:

 GO RIGHT NOW TO:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

 A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
 with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines 
 to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.

 1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
 2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
 4) and 5) Leave Blank
 11) Check Late Filed check box.
 12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

 The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I 
 will assume you guys have covered. :-)

 Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
 broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
 them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct 
 spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one 
 sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this 
 NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in 
 support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.

 Thanks guys,
 Scriv

 PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on 
 if you are.




-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
Maybe their comment retrieval system is broken.  I manually edited the
link that I sent because when you click on their view all button, it
puts the number of records that it is aware of here:
start=1end=###records###  That effectively limits the query to this
number of records. Since I assumed that more records would be added by
the time people clicked the link, I changed this number to 2000.
That's why all of the comments are displaying.  I assume that this is
because the method they use to calculate how many records result from
the search is broken.  It could also be a hack to only show certain
records when you click 'all records.'  Either way it's a poor design
and should be changed.

 - Tony


On 10/4/2005 1:24 PM, George created:
 Ok something wacky is going on.
 Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186
 
 
 George
 
 Tony Weasler wrote:
 
 Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my first filing
 I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it from
 COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.

 The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that you send to
 the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it with the
 correct information.

 Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought they filed
 should check to see if your filing is still there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186start=1end=2000first_time=N


  - Tony

 P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 1/1/05 are
 marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT or STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being erased as
 well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as a STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the search
 results.  Should we be filing notices instead?


 On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:

 Funny thing is I filled this one out.
 I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we
 sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and
 my response can not be found.
 Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

 George


 John Scrivner wrote:


 I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message
 to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused
 television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  04-186
 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition
 from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want
 anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the
 FCC that you need those unused television channels to help grow your
 business and serve those hard to reach customers then please do so
 now. Here are the instructions once again:

 GO RIGHT NOW TO:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

 A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks
 with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines
 to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.

 1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
 2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
 4) and 5) Leave Blank
 11) Check Late Filed check box.
 12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

 The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I
 will assume you guys have covered. :-)

 Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for
 broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell
 them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct
 spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one
 sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this
 NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in
 support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.

 Thanks guys,
 Scriv

 PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if
 you are.



 
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
The issue is a caching issue. Dump your cached memory in your browser 
and all works.

Scriv


George wrote:


Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we 
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and 
my response can not be found.

Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:

I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message 
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused 
television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  
04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do 
not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels 
to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers 
then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again:


GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines 
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I 
will assume you guys have covered. :-)


Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct 
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one 
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this 
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in 
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on 
if you are.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread John Scrivner
Well maybe I am wrong. Now I am only seeing 240 comments. This is after 
I dumped cache. I am not sure what is wrong here now.

Scriv


George wrote:


Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we 
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and 
my response can not be found.

Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:

I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message 
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused 
television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard.  
04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do 
not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels 
to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers 
then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again:


GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks 
with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines 
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I 
will assume you guys have covered. :-)


Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for 
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell 
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct 
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one 
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this 
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in 
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on 
if you are.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-04 Thread Tony Weasler
I am also seeing only 240 and the two filings that I posted today are
missing... in fact, I only see one filing from 10/4 and I know that
there were at least 4 there earlier.

My filing a few days ago that was missing this morning appears to have
re-appeared as well.  Something strange is going on.  Anyone know
their webmaster and can tell us what's up?

 - Tony


On 10/4/2005 4:22 PM, John Scrivner created:
 Well maybe I am wrong. Now I am only seeing 240 comments. This is after
 I dumped cache. I am not sure what is wrong here now.
 Scriv
 
 
 George wrote:
 
 Funny thing is I filled this one out.
 I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we
 sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and
 my response can not be found.
 Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing?

 George


 John Scrivner wrote:

 I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message
 to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused
 television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard. 
 04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge
 opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do
 not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not
 already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels
 to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers
 then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again:

 GO RIGHT NOW TO:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

 A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks
 with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines
 to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly.

 1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
 2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
 4) and 5) Leave Blank
 11) Check Late Filed check box.
 12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

 The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I
 will assume you guys have covered. :-)

 Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for
 broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell
 them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct
 spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one
 sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this
 NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in
 support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling.

 Thanks guys,
 Scriv

 PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on
 if you are.



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/