Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are
the current players?
Aperto, Alvarion, Airspan?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
In 2.5: Motorola, Huawei, PureWave, ZTE, Gemtek
--
Blake Covarrubias
On May 12, 2011, at 9:49, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are the
current players?
Aperto, Alvarion, Airspan?
Gino A. Villarini
Tranzeo has a 2.5 that just went through OET last November. Perhaps they
have something that scales like Aperto?
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=ExhibitsRequestTimeout=500calledFromFrame=Napplication_id=182519fcc_id=%27QRF-PVE25XBY%27
For some reason IE9
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are the
current players?
Redline Communications has a few new series named RDL-, and some
of them support 4.9. 2.5 is a band they long ago decided not
http://www.mtin.net/blog/2010/10/23/4g-defined-wimax-and-lte-dont-qualify-mo
bilize-infoworld/
The truth is, neither WiMax nor LTE (Long-Term Evolution) qualify as 4G
(fourth-generation) technologies, according to the International
Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). On
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Once you get to say 1000+ customers, things like having the staff for
service calls and time to repair for customers are often more important
than the brand of radio or the original cost of the radio. We do spend
more on payroll than radios, despite deploying lots
I don't think so :)
And the only one on this list out of the States? Is that right?
--
Ing. Paolo Di Francesco
Teleinform S.p.A.
Sede Legale: Via Francesco Paolo Di Blasi 1, 90144 Palermo
Unita' Operativa: Via Regione Siciliana 49, 90046 Monreale (Palermo)
Tel: +39-091-6408576,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600, Wallace Walcher wrote:
Having built my WISP from scratch with my own resources and currently being
debt free in my operations, I often wonder who the people are who so quickly
classify Mikrotik and Ubiquity gear as trash. I am making a very good
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600, Wallace Walcher wrote:
Having built my WISP from scratch with my own resources and currently being
debt free in my operations, I often wonder who the people
by trying to
grow?
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jp
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600
tight at 700 customers? Or do you go-for-broke by trying
to grow?
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jp
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jp
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600, Wallace Walcher wrote:
Having built my WISP from scratch with my
Having built my WISP from scratch with my own resources and currently being
debt free in my operations, I often wonder who the people are who so quickly
classify Mikrotik and Ubiquity gear as trash. I am making a very good
living deploying such trash.
My perception is they are either people who
Comments inline below:
I find these comparisons of products like Ubiquiti / Mikrotik vs. Motorola
/ WiMAX products to be somewhat unrealistic -- it seems to me that it's
like comparing something that's hypothetical and looks good on paper and
hoping that it will actually work
I don't think
Many of those licenses had serious restrictions, which is why the auction
reverse was so low in the first place.
-Matt
On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
Speaking of which, did anyone notice the results of the latest BRS Auction
(#86)
Licenses went for an average of $0.03 /
stories.
Rubens
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
Ubiquiti was changing
...@cticonnect.com
Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
Ubiquiti was changing the game with their new $75 AP that does 150
Mb or something (as compared
, 2009 at 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
Ubiquiti was changing the game with their new $75 AP that does 150
Mb or something (as compared to the Alvarion/Motorolas/WiMAX guys
: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
Ubiquiti was changing the game with their new $75 AP that does 150
Mb or something (as compared to the Alvarion/Motorolas/WiMAX guys of
the world who still don't
still works.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:48 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Ubiquiti's move
stories.
Rubens
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charles Wuc...@cticonnect.com
Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
Ubiquiti was changing
, but it might get to the
100/user per-AP scale. 3 or 6 months from now we will know of either
large deployments or #ubntfail stories.
Rubens
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charles Wuc...@cticonnect.com
Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
To: WISPA
...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Gino Villarini wrote
I don't see LTE being developed for other markets than cellcos
Don't expect a LTE system for EBS spectrum
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com
wrote:
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for
the
Sounds like you gave a choice for the answer, if the government does, then you
have, twice. WIMAX equipment cost is the entry block. As broadband needs keep
growing, you'll see an increased number of smaller wisp cells using equipment
such as UBNT. That is until the government uses your money
.3dbnetworks.com
dan...@3-db.net
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say the question boils down to who's going
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in the
right hands in many cases, a Corvette will beat the Porsche, but the Porsche
is 35x more expensive.
-
Mike
, 2009 11:04 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Sorry I saw this on CNN and it made me laugh
http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/30/autos/GM_Corvette_recall.cnnw/index.htm
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
dan...@3-db.net
-Original Message-
From
ecember 29, 2009 7:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in the
right hands in many cases, a Corvette will beat the Porsche, but the Porsche
is 35x more expensive.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
Maybe one can outrun 802.16e?
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bret Clark
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while the
Porsche race drivers are pretty cool, I find most Porsche off track
owners to be rather snobbish...but I not sure what any
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 8:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while the
Porsche race drivers are pretty cool, I find most Porsche off track owners
to be rather snobbish...but I not sure what any
hopper?
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would
Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would say Im very satisfied with my current BMW
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would say Im very satisfied with my
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
A Porsche Cayenne could probably handle it, plus do about 140mph.
I almost got a used one last spring, but my wife vetoed
...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would say Im very satisfied with my current BMW
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
Are we still talking about WiMax?
Me thinks this thread hath strayed.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
A Porsche Cayenne could probably handle it, plus do about 140mph.
I almost got a used one last spring, but my wife vetoed it. Had a lot
of fun on the take it home overnight test drive though. :^)
I'm personally going to wait for the BWM X6s to start
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Are we still talking about WiMax?
Me thinks this thread hath strayed.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
For that i have my Nissan Pathfinder
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 30, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com
wrote:
Personally, I prefer my 4-door Wrangler with my custom roof rack. I
can
go
no worries.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Hey, we are all winding down from a long year...
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would say Im very satisfied with my current BMW
Gino
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
deployment -- you or the government =)
With or without government stimulus I'm curious of the lists' general
consensus on whether or not WiMAX is worthwhile investment in this 'war' of
LTE vs WiMAX
I find these comparisons of products like Ubiquiti / Mikrotik vs. Motorola /
WiMAX products to be somewhat unrealistic -- it seems to me that it's like
comparing something that's hypothetical and looks good on paper and hoping
that it will actually work
Here's my question; sure, on paper, the
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance.
Would not use Mikrotik for any RF due to our desire to stay legal.
On
General Listwireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance.
Would not use Mikrotik for any RF due to our desire to stay
: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as
injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance
Sorry. Dumb iPhone auto correction changed Tropos to tripod. Lol
On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org wrote:
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy
Here we go again.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Ralph
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:15 PM
To: e...@wisp-router.com; WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Go ahead
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance.
But there's a huge difference between using a few here and there and
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems
Speaking of which, did anyone notice the results of the latest BRS Auction (#86)
Licenses went for an average of $0.03 / MHz POP
That means if 60 MHz covering 100,000 people (as defined by Census 2000
numbers) would have gone for $180k -- with the small business 35% credit - that
means a WISP
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something that will work in an urban
environment with self install radios, can deliver voice and if possible
with PPP/NAT/DHCP in
3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something that will work in an urban
environment with self install radios
29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something that will work in an urban
that and more
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA
: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e
m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We
is a waste of our time and
energy.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Gino,
Where can I find detailed info
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Q3 is a better guess I think...
Travis
Microserv
Gino Villarini wrote:
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
on this many times.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band,
our
basic criteria
applicable to licensed bands.
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We
...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something
] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Patrick,
16e is where the majority of the chipset development is at, and where
companies such as Alcatel/Cisco/Motorola/Alvarion/Zyxel are focusing,
and the new big deployments (Clearwire) are using 802.16e, and we want
that
customer to LTE later.
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30% more) latency, less
throughput per MHz, higher overhead and more cost. And you won't get any
hope for interoperability, indoor modems, USB dongles or PC cards, since
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Less?
Moto
-
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Less?
Moto is comming out with a 16e system with 4.5 bits per hz using mimo
Sent from my
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Soon as in q1 or q2
IIRC
$350~ SM
$3500~ AP
Specs are in the website under 320 series
Sent from my
: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Less?
Moto is comming out with a 16e system with 4.5 bits per hz using mimo
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com
wrote:
Why is your basic criteria .16e
LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even less
mass development.
Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
802.16e in these frequency bands?
Huwaei then (in my opinion)
uses its capture of .16e customers as the Trojan Horse
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
2) Mikroik AP MIMO- $400, capacity: same as Ubiquiti, but with Spectrum
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and
even less mass
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when
802.16e is mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps
might be more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
2) Mikroik AP MIMO- $400, capacity: same as Ubiquiti
- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks wi...@3-db.net
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've seen Moto
give
- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
In our case, the numbers are about $20k for three sectors yielding an
aggregate
, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've seen
Moto
give
pricing way before a product is actually set to release and its way
off
the
mark. I hope it's right for Moto sake :-)
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've seen
Moto
give
pricing way before a product is actually set to release and its way
off
the
mark. I hope it's right
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when
802.16e is mentioned
--
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:01 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Tom
ROTFL
You can't compare a ubiquiti to a motorola 16e
That's like comparing a Yugo
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x
:01 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Tom
ROTFL
You can't compare a ubiquiti to a motorola 16e
That's like comparing a Yugo with a Porsche
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 9:00
LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even
less
mass development.
Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
802.16e in these frequency bands?
Hi Blake,
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
deployment -- you or the government =)
With or without government stimulus I'm curious of the lists' general consensus
on whether or not WiMAX is worthwhile investment in this 'war' of LTE vs WiMAX.
Having Uncle Sam
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband to homes and businesses. Highly available.
Secure. More expensive, more scalable and somewhat higher latency
@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Have you deployed it? From my initial research, it appears that the
bigger vendors Motorola/Alverion are supporting the 802.16e variety
I'm researching these two technologies and Wimax in general, does anyone
have any firsthand experience with the two current different types of
Wimax, or references to the differences in the two different types of
technologies for broadband fixed rural deployments?
Regards
Michael Baird
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband to homes and businesses. Highly
available. Secure. More expensive, more scalable and somewhat higher
latency than similar fixed technologies based on 802.11 and other
Have you deployed it? From my initial research, it appears that the
bigger vendors Motorola/Alverion are supporting the 802.16e variety,
while the smaller vendors such as Tranzeo are supporting the 802.16d
variety. I'm aware of the advantages at the Mac Layer, but why would
802.16d at 3.65
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Have you deployed it? From my initial research, it appears that the
bigger vendors Motorola/Alverion are supporting the 802.16e variety,
while the smaller vendors such as Tranzeo are supporting the 802.16d
variety. I'm aware of the advantages
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
Have you deployed it? From my initial
levels you can
accommodate. Since you have more spectral space to do the power in.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:29:57
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
