[WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offend anyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting with minimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff Broadwick
New U.S. Push to Regulate Internet Access By AMY SCHATZ WASHINGTON-In a move that will stoke a battle over the future of the Internet, the federal government plans to propose regulating broadband lines under decades-old rules designed for traditional phone networks. The decision, by Federal

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offend anyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting with minimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703961104575226583645448758.html Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Thu,

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offendanyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting withminimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread MDK
Opinion: It won't be good. Also, the financial reform currently contains a provision that requires ANY contract that can be construed as credit extended to your customer be approved by an as yet not created federal agency. ++ Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-17 Thread Scottie Arnett
But THEY are going to get one, and I doubt you or I will see that change during our lifetime. Scottie -- Original Message -- From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:42:57 -0500 On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:29 -0600, Scottie Arnett

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-17 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Finally someone in the major press willing to call a spade a spade. marlon - Original Message - From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 1:29 PM Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ REVIEW OUTLOOK MARCH 15, 2010

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-17 Thread Tom DeReggi
] From Today's WSJ On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:29 -0600, Scottie Arnett wrote: If they are giving them some form of subsidy to build these networks, then I think we should have access to use it too. This is the wrong way to view it, though. I'm not looking to argue the point, but want to address

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-16 Thread Brian Webster
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Scottie, the problem is nothing at all to do with open access.This open access has the effect of fixing the type of access. Once you build a network, and a third party mandates you share it at prices they set, no more networks will be built

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-16 Thread Scottie Arnett
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Did they even give the open access a chance even back then? This was the start for the end of the dial-up ISP's. Do they not remember the end of line sharing in the early 2000's? The throw-off of what the big players did not think would ever succeed

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-16 Thread Butch Evans
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:29 -0600, Scottie Arnett wrote: If they are giving them some form of subsidy to build these networks, then I think we should have access to use it too. This is the wrong way to view it, though. I'm not looking to argue the point, but want to address this in a

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-16 Thread Josh Luthman
Either way you put it suggests that capitalism is being destroyed. On 3/16/10, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:29 -0600, Scottie Arnett wrote: If they are giving them some form of subsidy to build these networks, then I think we should have access to use it

[WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Jeff Broadwick
REVIEW OUTLOOK MARCH 15, 2010 Broadband Trojan Horse The FCC has a new plan but doesn't want a vote. Health care isn't the only policy arena in which the Obama Administration aims to ram through controversial new rules. The Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil a national broadband

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Jack Unger
It's those damn communists. They're on the march again. Quick, man the barricades! Wait, I'm wrong. It's ATT and Verizon. They're on the march again. Quick, open the gates to the City. Jeff Broadwick wrote: REVIEW OUTLOOK MARCH 15, 2010 Broadband Trojan Horse The FCC has a new plan but

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Patrick Leary
. Patrick Leary A veteran An American, like many of you -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 1:30 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ REVIEW OUTLOOK MARCH

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Jeff Broadwick
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 4:46 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ It's those damn communists. They're on the march again. Quick, man the barricades! Wait, I'm wrong. It's ATT and Verizon. They're

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Patrick Leary
the Baltic republics circa early 1990's. Patrick -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:52 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Wow, Jack and Patrick

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Patrick Leary
: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Hi Jeff, Mine was not a return bomb to you Jeff, just a general comment about the state of our society. To be sure though it was not a news article, it was an opinion piece and one, in my opinion, laden with the codes du jour intended to drive people apart into one camp

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread RickG
Do not feed the trolls :) On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote: It's those damn communists. They're on the march again. Quick, man the barricades! Wait, I'm wrong. It's ATT and Verizon. They're on the march again. Quick, open the gates to the City. Jeff

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Jeff Broadwick
] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:37 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Hi Jeff, Mine was not a return bomb to you Jeff, just a general comment about the state of our society. To be sure though it was not a news article, it was an opinion piece

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Jeff Broadwick
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:16 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Hi Patrick, I'm sorry. My note was more directed at my good friend Jack than at you. :-) I'm not a fan of the government's intervention

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread Scottie Arnett
x106 (US/Can) +1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 4:46 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ It's those damn communists

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread MDK
++ -- From: Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:19 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ A misplaced personal opinion rant: The new United States, where everything is written

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-03-15 Thread MDK
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Did they even give the open access a chance even back then? This was the start for the end of the dial-up ISP's. Do they not remember the end of line sharing in the early 2000's? The throw-off of what the big players did not think would ever succeed, being

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-25 Thread Stuart Pierce
WE collectively NEED handouts from the taxpayers? Like hell we do. All we need is some guts and a willingness to actually risk a bit for what we actually believe in. I think you meant DO WE collectively NEED handouts from the taxpayers? like hell we do not need them.

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-23 Thread MDK
@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ That is my point. Over my lifetime, I've done a lot of moving and traveling. What I find is that some areas are not as progressive as others - and they want it that way. Why do the Feds think they know whats best for these areas? Dont

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-22 Thread Stuart Pierce
General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ In my 3 county area that I was developing an application for, there were 25,000 households without access to service and in one of those counties I was only covering the lower

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-22 Thread RickG
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ In my 3 county area that I was developing an application for, there were 25,000 households without access to service and in one of those counties I was only

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-22 Thread Scottie Arnett
- Original Message - From: Chuck Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ In my 3 county area that I was developing an application for, there were 25,000 households

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Chuck Bartosch
@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Marlon, Read this take rate brief I wrote with one of the data companies I work with. It will take you about 10 minutes. It goes in to specific detail of how the study was conducted and the sources

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Jeff Broadwick
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can) +1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:49 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Right

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:06 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ So, the salient points are, as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong): (1) Brian's numbers are 24 million currently HAVE NO ACCESS TO SERVICE. His number DOES NOT INCLUDE the number who have access but have chosen

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
- Original Message - From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 5:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Actually, from where I'm sitting, it seems like roll-outs have slowed dramatically as people

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread MDK
that number shrinks steadily... -- From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:22 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ I won't comment on the first parts

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread MDK
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:28 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread MDK
... -- From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:21 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Our rollouts have slowed but only because demand has dropped off. Those that want

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Chuck Bartosch
, marlon - Original Message - From: Chuck Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:06 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ So, the salient points are, as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong): (1

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
: Chuck Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ In my 3 county area that I was developing an application for, there were 25,000 households without access to service and in one

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Travis Johnson
in it! Man I could be making a lot more money if I lived nearly anywhere else! marlon - Original Message - From: Chuck Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Webster
: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ You've got an area with 25k households close by and you don't have anything in there? No one else has anything there either? That's 2.5 times MORE than my ENTIRE COUNTY has in it! Man I could be making a lot more money if I lived nearly anywhere else! marlon

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Until you have to deal with the trees and mountains he has too :-) Thank You, Brian Webster -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Thursday, January 21

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread RickG
: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com jun...@ask-wi.com Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread RickG
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:49 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Right: The Technology Policy Institute notes that at the current rates of broadband adoption the U.S. is behind

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread RickG
Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ So, the salient points are, as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong): (1) Brian's numbers are 24 million currently HAVE NO ACCESS TO SERVICE. His number DOES NOT INCLUDE the number who have access but have chosen not to subscribe. (2) You

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Jack Unger
t; jun...@ask-wi.com jun...@ask-wi.com Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 o

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-21 Thread Chuck Bartosch
Bartosch ch...@clarityconnect.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ In my 3 county area that I was developing an application for, there were 25,000 households without access to service and in one

[WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jeff Broadwick
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104574652501608376552.ht ml?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop * REVIEW OUTLOOK * JANUARY 20, 2010 A 'National Broadband Plan' One more solution in search of a problem. The Federal Communications Commission recently told Congress that it

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece (especially now that Rupurt Murdoch owns it) for the telcos. jack Jeff Broadwick

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
20, 2010 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece (especially now that Rupurt

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Mike Hammett
@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece (especially now that Rupurt Murdoch owns

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
2010 10:27 AM To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadban

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jeff Broadwick
] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece (especially now that Rupurt Murdoch owns it) for the telcos. jack Jeff

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
eff Jeff Broadwick ImageStream 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can) +1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:28 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fro

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jeff Broadwick
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sure coverage is increasing but that's just a distraction. The issue is that the current level of home broadband Internet access is way too low and millions of people are deprived of Internet

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Mike Hammett
http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG :-p - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: Jack Unger Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sure coverage is increasing

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sure coverage is increasing but that's just a distraction. The issue is that the current level of home broadband Internet access is way too low and millions of people are deprived of Internet access at home (or in a home-based business). The article

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
OK, as I understand that the report is based upon the 477 data? marlon - Original Message - From: Jack Unger To: WISPA General List Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:41 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Marlon, See the attached report. Go to Table 2 on page

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Nice teddy bear! - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ http://www.wispa.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/Jack.JPG :-p

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
teddy bear! - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" wispawirel...@ics-il.net To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ http://www.wispa.org/wp-content

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread RickG
...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:28 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread RickG
Of Jack Unger Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:28 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread RickG
, January 20, 2010 12:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sure coverage is increasing but that's just a distraction. The issue is that the current level of home broadband Internet access is way too low and millions of people are deprived of Internet access at home

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread RickG
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:32 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ OK, as I understand that the report is based upon the 477 data? marlon - Original Message

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
...@wirelessmapping.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Marlon, Read this take rate brief I wrote with one of the data companies I work with. It will take you about 10 minutes. It goes in to specific detail of how the study

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread MDK
:27 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Webster
the marketing data at the census block level prior to July. Thank You, Brian Webster -Original Message- From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:o...@odessaoffice.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:46 PM To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Heya

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread RickG
. -- From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Jack Unger
he growth of actual data moved... The percentage increase every month is near or at double digits. -- From: "Jack Unger" jun...@ask-wi.com Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org S

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Josh Luthman
is near or at double digits. -- From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com jun...@ask-wi.com Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Sorry

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2010-01-20 Thread Mike Hammett
Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:58 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Is that directly off the pages of the Democrat

[WISPA] from today's WSJ

2009-12-30 Thread Chuck Profito
ENJOY; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126221116097210861.html OH, LATH, PLASTER AND CHICKEN WIRE, A near Perfect 2.4 Faraday cage! WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

[WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Jeff Broadwick
Congress Approves Broadband to Nowhere Why the U.S. lags in Internet speed. * By L. GORDON CROVITZ In Japan, wireless technology works so well that teenagers draft novels on their cellphones. People in Hong Kong take it for granted that they can check their BlackBerrys from

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread reader
General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:38 AM Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Congress Approves Broadband to Nowhere Why the U.S. lags in Internet speed. * By L. GORDON CROVITZ In Japan, wireless technology works so well that teenagers draft novels

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Jonathan Schmidt
To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ I'd like to ponit out that the article leaves out some information, and it leaves you with a false impression because of it. It made note of the price of broadband being cheaper in Japan and other places. That's true, but much

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Anthony Will
Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:38 AM Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Congress Approves Broadband to Nowhere Why the U.S. lags in Internet speed. * By L. GORDON CROVITZ In Japan, wireless technology

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Jeff Broadwick
broadband component. Jeff -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Schmidt Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:52 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Most of the innuendos and descriptions were ill

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Jonathan Schmidt
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:28 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Agreed, I don't like the international comparisons because they are apples/oranges. It's not fair to compare

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:30 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ I'd like to ponit out that the article

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2009-02-02 Thread Nathan Stooke
] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:39 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ Congress Approves Broadband to Nowhere Why the U.S. lags in Internet speed. * By L. GORDON CROVITZ In Japan, wireless technology works so well that teenagers

[WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2008-02-07 Thread Jeff Broadwick
REVIEW OUTLOOK Purblind Auction February 7, 2008; Page A18 The Federal Communications Commission is bragging about its latest wireless auction, with total bids of more than $19 billion after two weeks. But dig beneath those numbers and the picture is less rosy. This wireless

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2008-02-07 Thread Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Jeff Broadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 1:48 PM Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ REVIEW OUTLOOK Purblind Auction February 7

[WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2007-02-16 Thread Jeff Broadwick
Note the Wireless portion of the growth from last year: REVIEW OUTLOOK Broadband Breakout February 16, 2007; Page A14 I love the free market, but the fact is more concentration means less competition, and these markets are less free than they should be. And this Commission is about

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ

2007-02-16 Thread Peter R.
Jeff, Who wrote this? One fact worth noting is the wireless number. It mostly means cellular. Cellular is not a third competitor. - Peter Jeff Broadwick wrote: Note the Wireless portion of the growth from last year: REVIEW OUTLOOK Broadband Breakout February 16, 2007; Page