First of all just because you don't have a signal does not mean a cell
carrier is waiting for you to put up a tower but that said I built a 120'
Commercial tower back 3 years ago and total cost to build was around 50k.
That was a tower to support cell and two way radio at 90mph wind load. I
think
At 11:43 AM -0400 3/14/07, Frank Watts wrote:
First of all just because you don't have a signal does not mean a cell
carrier is waiting for you to put up a tower but that said I built a 120'
Commercial tower back 3 years ago and total cost to build was around 50k.
That was a tower to support
At 10:53 AM -0500 3/14/07, JohnnyO wrote:
15K seems awful low for a tower on top of a mountain.
You can build a 100ft Rohn45/Rohn55 for 15k - on flat / level land where
there aren't any major challenges Then again - No Cell carrier I
know of would go on such a tower.
What kind of tower
Chuck,
My first impression of the situation is that your customer is seeing
dollar signs because he has heard cell companies pay big bucks to locate
on towers but does not actually realize all the costs associated with
such a tower that a cell company might possibly locate on. I have seen
Cell carriers normally use site acquisition people, contract most
of the time. Not brokers.
Another thing that prevents them often from considering smaller
companies towers is agreements they have with the larger companies. As
an example, we have agreements with two carriers - flat rate
At 12:35 PM -0400 3/14/07, Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Chuck,
My first impression of the situation is that your customer is seeing
dollar signs because he has heard cell companies pay big bucks to
locate on towers but does not actually realize all the costs
associated with such a tower that a cell
At 12:03 PM -0500 3/14/07, Blake Bowers wrote:
Cell carriers normally use site acquisition people, contract most
of the time. Not brokers.
I used the wrong term (not being in the business). That's essentially
what I meant. I've come across the site acq. people before.
Another thing that