Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-09 Thread Bo Hamilton
What??

Bo
On 1/4/06, Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful that you dont cut your nose off to spite your face on theTrango issue!I also know Trango is a better product than Moto is more ways than one
and Trango is going to be releasing a lower priced 5.x SU that will bevery competitive with Moto as they have made some changes in theproduction of the external housing to allow a lower cost. I think theyare going to implement a cheap plastic housing like Motorola?
Mac DearmanMaximum Access, LLC.www.inetsouth.comwww.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600Matt Liotta wrote: We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences
 and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but
 we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than
 they can't work with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer
 grade technology stop us from going that route. Any thoughts from the list? -Matt--WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirelessArchives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-05 Thread Matt Liotta
The Tranzeo radios at least are 802.11, which we refuse to use for fixed 
wireless.


-Matt

Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:


Matt,

I've talked to quite a few people who are looking at Tranzeo 
CPE/StarOS APs for 5.3/5.8Ghz multipoint deployments and have had good 
luck myself so far.  The combination of StarOS AP units and Tranzeo 
CPE units seems to work fairly well.  Within a 5 mile radius, you will 
probably be able to maintain 15-20meg of throughput and 40-50 subs per 
sector depending on the size of the pipes that you deliver to the 
customers.  StarOS can handle batch firmware uploads, routing at the 
AP, bandwidth control at the AP, vlan tagging, OSFP/RIP routing, DNS 
at the AP, QOS and packet shaping for VOIP and other traffic and it 
also has great troubleshooting information  along with hooks into 
several of the open source monitoring and traffic graphing systems.   
Another plus is that it will run on several hardware combinations, so 
you can choose the type of radio/sbc platform that best suits your 
needs.  The Tranzeo CPE units are inexpensive ($225-$300), easy to 
install and work great with StarOS.
If you go with an all StarOS system, my understanding is that the new 
version (v3) will also have the ability to use 5mhz, 10mhz and 20mhz 
channels and will be ready for 5.4Ghz with no need for additional 
hardware changes.  It also works in the 4.9Ghz public safety 
spectrum.  We provide the backhaul for several video feeds for the 
local law enforcement on 4.9 - works great.

I think that is a combination worth considering.

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brad Larson wrote:

Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a 
business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do 
you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is 
managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support 
important

to you? Brad




-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some 
of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share 
experiences and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have 
experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some 
better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets 
our needs, but we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We 
would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to 
use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other 
reason than they can't work with distributors. We really like the 
flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but 
the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi 
being a consumer grade technology stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
 





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-05 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
If you have already committed to that idea, then I can't really persuade 
you.  With the exception of Canopy and some of the other specialized 
gear, just about everything else is 802.11 based in one way or another.  
Karlnet/Terabeam, Trango and even the Alvarion VL is based on 802.11 
chipsets with a fancy MAC in front of it. 

FWIW, I know of quite a few people who have had better luck with Tranzeo 
5.8 and StarOS units for backhauls and ptmp compared to non-802.11 
systems like Canopy.   Higher speeds and more flexibility when dealing 
with interference.  But if that doesn't meet your parameters, then that 
is your prerogative.


Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Matt Liotta wrote:

The Tranzeo radios at least are 802.11, which we refuse to use for 
fixed wireless.


-Matt

Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:


Matt,

I've talked to quite a few people who are looking at Tranzeo 
CPE/StarOS APs for 5.3/5.8Ghz multipoint deployments and have had 
good luck myself so far.  The combination of StarOS AP units and 
Tranzeo CPE units seems to work fairly well.  Within a 5 mile radius, 
you will probably be able to maintain 15-20meg of throughput and 
40-50 subs per sector depending on the size of the pipes that you 
deliver to the customers.  StarOS can handle batch firmware uploads, 
routing at the AP, bandwidth control at the AP, vlan tagging, 
OSFP/RIP routing, DNS at the AP, QOS and packet shaping for VOIP and 
other traffic and it also has great troubleshooting information  
along with hooks into several of the open source monitoring and 
traffic graphing systems.   Another plus is that it will run on 
several hardware combinations, so you can choose the type of 
radio/sbc platform that best suits your needs.  The Tranzeo CPE units 
are inexpensive ($225-$300), easy to install and work great with StarOS.
If you go with an all StarOS system, my understanding is that the new 
version (v3) will also have the ability to use 5mhz, 10mhz and 20mhz 
channels and will be ready for 5.4Ghz with no need for additional 
hardware changes.  It also works in the 4.9Ghz public safety 
spectrum.  We provide the backhaul for several video feeds for the 
local law enforcement on 4.9 - works great.

I think that is a combination worth considering.

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brad Larson wrote:

Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a 
business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do 
you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is 
managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support 
important

to you? Brad




-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some 
of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share 
experiences and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have 
experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some 
better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general 
meets our needs, but we don't like being constrained on the antenna. 
We would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would 
like to use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for 
no other reason than they can't work with distributors. We really 
like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the 
price, but the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception 
of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology stop us from going that 
route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
 







--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-05 Thread Tom DeReggi

Matt,

So what are you using to provide/inject MPLS support on your network?
I heard there were some open source MPLS projects. Did any of them fly?

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We mostly serve MTUs, so we don't have that many subscribers that aren't 
managed by our MPLS network. Radio management is important, but much less 
important than for the folks doing a more traditional fixed wireless 
network.


-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:

Will this network be scaling to 10 subscribers in one town or 1,000 or 
more

subscribers over many square miles? The more you scale may mean that
features such as batch processing for easy firmware upgrades and other
management features will save you money in the long run. Ongoing costs and
radio features are seldom talked about when a question like yours is 
asked.

X brand is cheaper may not be what you want or need to hear. Brad


-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We want as much capacity as possible, but certainly 10Mbps minimum. This 
is for business customers only and we won't be oversubscribing the 
sectors, so there isn't a need to support many subscribers per sector. Not 
sure what you are asking in terms of scale, could you be more specific? 
VoIP will be used across the radio links however the traffic is 
encapsulated in MPLS.


-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:


Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a 
business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you 
want

to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support


important


to you? Brad




-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work with 
distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios 
and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the protocol and 
the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology stop us from 
going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt







--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-05 Thread Matt Liotta

Tom DeReggi wrote:


Matt,

So what are you using to provide/inject MPLS support on your network?
I heard there were some open source MPLS projects. Did any of them fly?


We use Cisco gear for MPLS.

-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Mac Dearman
Be careful that you dont cut your nose off to spite your face on the 
Trango issue!


I also know Trango is a better product than Moto is more ways than one 
and Trango is going to be releasing a lower priced 5.x SU that will be 
very competitive with Moto as they have made some changes in the 
production of the external housing to allow a lower cost. I think they 
are going to implement a cheap plastic housing like Motorola?


Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600





Matt Liotta wrote:

We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences 
and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented 
with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. 
From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but 
we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use 
sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal 
polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than 
they can't work with distributors. We really like the flexibility on 
many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but the contention 
aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer 
grade technology stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Matt Liotta
A better product is nice and all, but there is more to product selection 
than just price/performance. We have to take into account availability. 
With distributors we can rely on them to stock a product, so that when 
we need it in a short time frame it is available. Distributors provide 
other benefits as well that I am sure most on this list are aware of. 
With Trango's actions we simply can't buy from them.


-Matt

Mac Dearman wrote:

Be careful that you dont cut your nose off to spite your face on the 
Trango issue!


I also know Trango is a better product than Moto is more ways than one 
and Trango is going to be releasing a lower priced 5.x SU that will be 
very competitive with Moto as they have made some changes in the 
production of the external housing to allow a lower cost. I think they 
are going to implement a cheap plastic housing like Motorola?


Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600





Matt Liotta wrote:

We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some 
of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share 
experiences and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have 
experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some 
better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets 
our needs, but we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We 
would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to 
use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other 
reason than they can't work with distributors. We really like the 
flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but 
the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi 
being a consumer grade technology stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread John Seaman
Hi Matt,  I just wanted to chime in here and let you know that although we are 
not using distributors any more we are committed to providing excellent 
customer service and are striving to have all products on hand at all times.  
Typically as long as we receive orders before 3 pm PST, we can ship same day.  
Trango got its start as a direct sales company and we have found that using the 
direct model we are able to best respond to the needs of our customers.

John Seaman
Trango Broadband Wireless

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [SPAM-HC] - Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios - Email has
different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses


A better product is nice and all, but there is more to product selection 
than just price/performance. We have to take into account availability. 
With distributors we can rely on them to stock a product, so that when 
we need it in a short time frame it is available. Distributors provide 
other benefits as well that I am sure most on this list are aware of. 
With Trango's actions we simply can't buy from them.

-Matt

Mac Dearman wrote:

 Be careful that you dont cut your nose off to spite your face on the 
 Trango issue!

 I also know Trango is a better product than Moto is more ways than one 
 and Trango is going to be releasing a lower priced 5.x SU that will be 
 very competitive with Moto as they have made some changes in the 
 production of the external housing to allow a lower cost. I think they 
 are going to implement a cheap plastic housing like Motorola?

 Mac Dearman
 Maximum Access, LLC.
 www.inetsouth.com
 www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
 318-728-8600 - Rayville
 318-728-9600





 Matt Liotta wrote:

 We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some 
 of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share 
 experiences and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have 
 experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some 
 better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets 
 our needs, but we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We 
 would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to 
 use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other 
 reason than they can't work with distributors. We really like the 
 flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but 
 the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi 
 being a consumer grade technology stop us from going that route.

 Any thoughts from the list?

 -Matt



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Tom DeReggi

John,

I want to add, there is one thing that Trango can't offer today with a 
direct model, and that is local availabilty. For example, when I need to 
rush an order in today, I'm going to need to eat some hefty Overnight 
shipping fees.  So Trango forfets profit margins that could be theirs or 
ours and gives it to UPS.  It would be nice if Trango got a warehouse on the 
East coast sooner or later. However with that said, it just means that we 
East Coast WISPs have to plan better.  I believe that the little extra 
planning/forecasting that we are going to have to do, is minimal compared to 
the added benefits of having direct communication with our manufacturer 
again and the new lower prices.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: John Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


Hi Matt,  I just wanted to chime in here and let you know that although we 
are not using distributors any more we are committed to providing excellent 
customer service and are striving to have all products on hand at all times. 
Typically as long as we receive orders before 3 pm PST, we can ship same 
day.  Trango got its start as a direct sales company and we have found that 
using the direct model we are able to best respond to the needs of our 
customers.


John Seaman
Trango Broadband Wireless

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [SPAM-HC] - Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios - Email has
different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses


A better product is nice and all, but there is more to product selection
than just price/performance. We have to take into account availability.
With distributors we can rely on them to stock a product, so that when
we need it in a short time frame it is available. Distributors provide
other benefits as well that I am sure most on this list are aware of.
With Trango's actions we simply can't buy from them.

-Matt

Mac Dearman wrote:


Be careful that you dont cut your nose off to spite your face on the
Trango issue!

I also know Trango is a better product than Moto is more ways than one
and Trango is going to be releasing a lower priced 5.x SU that will be
very competitive with Moto as they have made some changes in the
production of the external housing to allow a lower cost. I think they
are going to implement a cheap plastic housing like Motorola?

Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600





Matt Liotta wrote:


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some
of our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share
experiences and ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have
experimented with Canopy and Trango, but would really like some
better choices. From a specification standpoint, Canopy general meets
our needs, but we don't like being constrained on the antenna. We
would like to use sectors bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to
use horizontal polarization. We don't want to use Trango for no other
reason than they can't work with distributors. We really like the
flexibility on many 802.11a-based radios and certainly the price, but
the contention aspects of the protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi
being a consumer grade technology stop us from going that route.

Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Brad Larson
Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support important
to you? Brad 





-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work 
with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based 
radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the 
protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology 
stop us from going that route.

Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.


 
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Matt Liotta
We want as much capacity as possible, but certainly 10Mbps minimum. This 
is for business customers only and we won't be oversubscribing the 
sectors, so there isn't a need to support many subscribers per sector. 
Not sure what you are asking in terms of scale, could you be more 
specific? VoIP will be used across the radio links however the traffic 
is encapsulated in MPLS.


-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:


Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support important
to you? Brad 






-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work 
with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based 
radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the 
protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology 
stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
 



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Brad Larson
Will this network be scaling to 10 subscribers in one town or 1,000 or more
subscribers over many square miles? The more you scale may mean that
features such as batch processing for easy firmware upgrades and other
management features will save you money in the long run. Ongoing costs and
radio features are seldom talked about when a question like yours is asked.
X brand is cheaper may not be what you want or need to hear. Brad


-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We want as much capacity as possible, but certainly 10Mbps minimum. This 
is for business customers only and we won't be oversubscribing the 
sectors, so there isn't a need to support many subscribers per sector. 
Not sure what you are asking in terms of scale, could you be more 
specific? VoIP will be used across the radio links however the traffic 
is encapsulated in MPLS.

-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:

Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support
important
to you? Brad 





-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work 
with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based 
radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the 
protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology 
stop us from going that route.

Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
  


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.


 
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Matt Liotta
We mostly serve MTUs, so we don't have that many subscribers that aren't 
managed by our MPLS network. Radio management is important, but much 
less important than for the folks doing a more traditional fixed 
wireless network.


-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:


Will this network be scaling to 10 subscribers in one town or 1,000 or more
subscribers over many square miles? The more you scale may mean that
features such as batch processing for easy firmware upgrades and other
management features will save you money in the long run. Ongoing costs and
radio features are seldom talked about when a question like yours is asked.
X brand is cheaper may not be what you want or need to hear. Brad


-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We want as much capacity as possible, but certainly 10Mbps minimum. This 
is for business customers only and we won't be oversubscribing the 
sectors, so there isn't a need to support many subscribers per sector. 
Not sure what you are asking in terms of scale, could you be more 
specific? VoIP will be used across the radio links however the traffic 
is encapsulated in MPLS.


-Matt

Brad Larson wrote:

 


Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support
   


important
 

to you? Brad 






-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work 
with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based 
radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the 
protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology 
stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt


   



 



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios

2006-01-04 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists

Matt,

I've talked to quite a few people who are looking at Tranzeo CPE/StarOS 
APs for 5.3/5.8Ghz multipoint deployments and have had good luck myself 
so far.  The combination of StarOS AP units and Tranzeo CPE units seems 
to work fairly well.  Within a 5 mile radius, you will probably be able 
to maintain 15-20meg of throughput and 40-50 subs per sector depending 
on the size of the pipes that you deliver to the customers.  StarOS can 
handle batch firmware uploads, routing at the AP, bandwidth control at 
the AP, vlan tagging, OSFP/RIP routing, DNS at the AP, QOS and packet 
shaping for VOIP and other traffic and it also has great troubleshooting 
information  along with hooks into several of the open source monitoring 
and traffic graphing systems.   Another plus is that it will run on 
several hardware combinations, so you can choose the type of radio/sbc 
platform that best suits your needs.  The Tranzeo CPE units are 
inexpensive ($225-$300), easy to install and work great with StarOS. 

If you go with an all StarOS system, my understanding is that the new 
version (v3) will also have the ability to use 5mhz, 10mhz and 20mhz 
channels and will be ready for 5.4Ghz with no need for additional 
hardware changes.  It also works in the 4.9Ghz public safety spectrum.  
We provide the backhaul for several video feeds for the local law 
enforcement on 4.9 - works great. 


I think that is a combination worth considering.

Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brad Larson wrote:


Matt, How much capacity do you need per 5.8 Ghz sector? Is this a business
or residential rollout or both? How many subscribers per sector do you want
to support? How large do you want to scale this network and is managment,
batch firmware loads for radio updates, vlan tagging, voip support important
to you? Brad 






-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 5.8Ghz Multi-point radios


We are looking to start deploying 5.8Ghz multi-point radios at some of 
our sites. I am hoping some folks on this list can share experiences and 
ideas on what radios might meet our needs. We have experimented with 
Canopy and Trango, but would really like some better choices. From a 
specification standpoint, Canopy general meets our needs, but we don't 
like being constrained on the antenna. We would like to use sectors 
bigger than 60 degrees and we would like to use horizontal polarization. 
We don't want to use Trango for no other reason than they can't work 
with distributors. We really like the flexibility on many 802.11a-based 
radios and certainly the price, but the contention aspects of the 
protocol and the perception of Wi-Fi being a consumer grade technology 
stop us from going that route.


Any thoughts from the list?

-Matt
 



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/