Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-09 Thread George Rogato
Matt, how much is your bandwidth, say 100megs, in the Pittock?

George

Matt Liotta wrote:
 On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
 *nods*  I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago.   
 Unfortunately
 they only have like 3 participants.

 Despite their lower participant numbers, I'm looking to join non- 
 Equinix
 exchanges here in Chicago (Any2 and ChicagoIX).

 We are members of Any2 in DC, which has very few members and we only  
 see about 100Kbps of traffic. I wouldn't waste your time.
 
 The place I get colo, etc. from in 350 E. Cermak offers a free 100 meg
 connection to ChicagoIX if you're a colo customer and most of the  
 members
 are on their route server.

 Just for general knowledge, how do some of the others relate on price
 compared to Equinix (assuming cheaper) and Any2 (assuming around the  
 same)?

 Any2 is the best deal around, but only on the west coast is there any  
 traffic. Big Apple, Nap of the Americas, and Seattle are cheap and  
 useful. Not that we are members of any of them.
 
 We will be probably join some additional exchanges in other markets  
 when we have customers there. We have other ISPs buying transit and  
 voice from us that put us in markets without a wireless footprint.  
 Chicago is on our radar, but thus far none of the ISPs we have talked  
 to have pulled the trigger.
 
 -Matt
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-09 Thread Matt Liotta
Any location within or very close to our market coverage we will build  
and install 100Mbps for $3600 MRC. Fiber lit locations and carrier  
hotels are way cheaper, but it depends on the address. There are WISPs  
who currently pay us $1000 MRC for a 100 meg commit on a GigE port at  
carrier hotels. The best part is that we don't get depeered once a  
year like Cogent. I think more interesting is the fact that we don't  
require signing up for large commits. We just had an ISP buy 20Mbps  
from us for $200 MRC. I think they were trying to ruin our ARPU. ;)

-Matt

On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:36 AM, George Rogato wrote:

 Matt, how much is your bandwidth, say 100megs, in the Pittock?

 George

 Matt Liotta wrote:
 On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 *nods*  I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago.
 Unfortunately
 they only have like 3 participants.

 Despite their lower participant numbers, I'm looking to join non-
 Equinix
 exchanges here in Chicago (Any2 and ChicagoIX).

 We are members of Any2 in DC, which has very few members and we only
 see about 100Kbps of traffic. I wouldn't waste your time.

 The place I get colo, etc. from in 350 E. Cermak offers a free 100  
 meg
 connection to ChicagoIX if you're a colo customer and most of the
 members
 are on their route server.

 Just for general knowledge, how do some of the others relate on  
 price
 compared to Equinix (assuming cheaper) and Any2 (assuming around the
 same)?

 Any2 is the best deal around, but only on the west coast is there any
 traffic. Big Apple, Nap of the Americas, and Seattle are cheap and
 useful. Not that we are members of any of them.

 We will be probably join some additional exchanges in other markets
 when we have customers there. We have other ISPs buying transit and
 voice from us that put us in markets without a wireless footprint.
 Chicago is on our radar, but thus far none of the ISPs we have talked
 to have pulled the trigger.

 -Matt



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Michael Baird
We have Akamai, they look at your AS and determine the amount of 
request. You probably need to draw 20 meg/s from their network before 
qualifying, they do provide machines to co-locate within your network, 
you just have to supply a /29 network. Limelight will not do this, they 
only will do a peering arrangement, I am currently in the process of 
exploring a peering arrangement with Limelight, I don't know their 
criteria for establishing a peering arrangment as of yet.

Regards
Michael Baird
 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming 
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into 
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem to 
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's network at 
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone know 
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us are 
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those who 
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100% business 
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and streaming 
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit costs 
 big time.

   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering  
policies that require little to get a peering relationship. Some  
require specific amounts of traffic and/or multiple geographically  
diverse connections.

Before you get your hopes up though I will warn you that connecting to  
peering fabrics has gotten expensive, while the price of transit has  
gotten cheap. For example, the most important peering fabric in the US  
is at Equinix Ashburn. Last quote I saw for peering ports was $1,500  
for 100Mbps and $3,000 for 1Gbps. Forgetting all the costs associated  
with getting into Ashburn, you would need 100Mbps of peer traffic just  
to get the cost of the peer traffic down to $15 per meg, which is  
higher than most carriers will sell you a 100Mbps of transit at  
Ashburn. In other words, unless you are doing 100s of megs of peering  
traffic, transit is cheaper.

-Matt

On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:

 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's  
 network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us  
 are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100% business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and  
 streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit  
 costs
 big time.

 -- 
 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Hammett
This web site is your friend:  www.peeringdb.com

A short while ago I was talking about peering and upstream selection on this 
list.

I doubt there's much of putting boxes somewhere due to the massive amounts 
of content now required to be on that box.

There's obviously a lot in Ashburn, but Equinix is damn expensive...  to the 
point where it's not exactly worth it from a cost savings perspective.
You also have Vienna and DC right there.

Being that close to DC, it can't be too difficult for you to get on some 
metro fiber and ride into these data centers to purchase cheap transit and 
peer with some of these guys.




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 6:47 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] CDN peering

 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100% business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit costs
 big time.

 -- 
 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Hammett
https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=4

It doesn't appear as if there are any exchanges in Michigan, you'd have to 
go to OH or Chicago to peer with anyone.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Michael Baird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:00 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

 We have Akamai, they look at your AS and determine the amount of
 request. You probably need to draw 20 meg/s from their network before
 qualifying, they do provide machines to co-locate within your network,
 you just have to supply a /29 network. Limelight will not do this, they
 only will do a peering arrangement, I am currently in the process of
 exploring a peering arrangement with Limelight, I don't know their
 criteria for establishing a peering arrangment as of yet.

 Regards
 Michael Baird
 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100% business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit costs
 big time.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Hammett
Matt does have a little bigger network than a lot of us.

;-)

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=724

How'd you get the Microsoft peer and what all sits on that?  I know their 
XBox downloads are on Limelight, but perhaps their others are on their own 
AS.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:52 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

 We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering
 policies that require little to get a peering relationship. Some
 require specific amounts of traffic and/or multiple geographically
 diverse connections.

 Before you get your hopes up though I will warn you that connecting to
 peering fabrics has gotten expensive, while the price of transit has
 gotten cheap. For example, the most important peering fabric in the US
 is at Equinix Ashburn. Last quote I saw for peering ports was $1,500
 for 100Mbps and $3,000 for 1Gbps. Forgetting all the costs associated
 with getting into Ashburn, you would need 100Mbps of peer traffic just
 to get the cost of the peer traffic down to $15 per meg, which is
 higher than most carriers will sell you a 100Mbps of transit at
 Ashburn. In other words, unless you are doing 100s of megs of peering
 traffic, transit is cheaper.

 -Matt

 On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:

 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's
 network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us
 are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100% business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and
 streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit
 costs
 big time.

 -- 
 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Microsoft is pretty open to peering. Additionally, they participate in  
Any2Easy (http://www.crgwest.com/Any2Exchange/any2easy.html), which is  
a multi-lateral peering service at CRG West facilities. If you don't  
have a lot of traffic multi-lateral peering is a must as it will get  
you connected to more networks than you could normally qualify for.

Again, I think you'll find that unless you are doing 100s of megs  
peering is not economical. Transit is really cheap now.

-Matt

On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Matt does have a little bigger network than a lot of us.

 ;-)

 https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=724

 How'd you get the Microsoft peer and what all sits on that?  I know  
 their
 XBox downloads are on Limelight, but perhaps their others are on  
 their own
 AS.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:52 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

 We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering
 policies that require little to get a peering relationship. Some
 require specific amounts of traffic and/or multiple geographically
 diverse connections.

 Before you get your hopes up though I will warn you that connecting  
 to
 peering fabrics has gotten expensive, while the price of transit has
 gotten cheap. For example, the most important peering fabric in the  
 US
 is at Equinix Ashburn. Last quote I saw for peering ports was $1,500
 for 100Mbps and $3,000 for 1Gbps. Forgetting all the costs associated
 with getting into Ashburn, you would need 100Mbps of peer traffic  
 just
 to get the cost of the peer traffic down to $15 per meg, which is
 higher than most carriers will sell you a 100Mbps of transit at
 Ashburn. In other words, unless you are doing 100s of megs of peering
 traffic, transit is cheaper.

 -Matt

 On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:

 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem  
 to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's
 network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone  
 know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us
 are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those  
 who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100%  
 business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and
 streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit
 costs
 big time.

 -- 
 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods*  I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago.  Unfortunately 
they only have like 3 participants.

Despite their lower participant numbers, I'm looking to join non-Equinix 
exchanges here in Chicago (Any2 and ChicagoIX).

The place I get colo, etc. from in 350 E. Cermak offers a free 100 meg 
connection to ChicagoIX if you're a colo customer and most of the members 
are on their route server.

Just for general knowledge, how do some of the others relate on price 
compared to Equinix (assuming cheaper) and Any2 (assuming around the same)?

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 10:05 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

 Microsoft is pretty open to peering. Additionally, they participate in
 Any2Easy (http://www.crgwest.com/Any2Exchange/any2easy.html), which is
 a multi-lateral peering service at CRG West facilities. If you don't
 have a lot of traffic multi-lateral peering is a must as it will get
 you connected to more networks than you could normally qualify for.

 Again, I think you'll find that unless you are doing 100s of megs
 peering is not economical. Transit is really cheap now.

 -Matt

 On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Matt does have a little bigger network than a lot of us.

 ;-)

 https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=724

 How'd you get the Microsoft peer and what all sits on that?  I know
 their
 XBox downloads are on Limelight, but perhaps their others are on
 their own
 AS.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:52 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

 We peer with every major content network. Most have open peering
 policies that require little to get a peering relationship. Some
 require specific amounts of traffic and/or multiple geographically
 diverse connections.

 Before you get your hopes up though I will warn you that connecting
 to
 peering fabrics has gotten expensive, while the price of transit has
 gotten cheap. For example, the most important peering fabric in the
 US
 is at Equinix Ashburn. Last quote I saw for peering ports was $1,500
 for 100Mbps and $3,000 for 1Gbps. Forgetting all the costs associated
 with getting into Ashburn, you would need 100Mbps of peer traffic
 just
 to get the cost of the peer traffic down to $15 per meg, which is
 higher than most carriers will sell you a 100Mbps of transit at
 Ashburn. In other words, unless you are doing 100s of megs of peering
 traffic, transit is cheaper.

 -Matt

 On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:

 With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
 applications that are on the horizon, has anyone here looked into
 peering with any of the major CDNs to reduce transit costs? I seem
 to
 remember hearing that Akamai would colo a box within an ISP's
 network at
 no cost to the ISP if there was enough (bandwidth) demand. Anyone
 know
 if Limelight will do something similar? I'm guessing that most of us
 are
 not big enough for this to be financially feasible, but for those
 who
 are, it seems that there could be some major savings. My 100%
 business
 customer base tends to use a lot of bandwidth from Youtube and
 streaming
 radio. A direct connection to Limelight would cut down on transit
 costs
 big time.

 -- 
 Patrick Shoemaker
 Vector Data Systems LLC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 office: (301) 358-1690 x36
 http://www.vectordatasystems.com


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CDN peering

2008-12-08 Thread Matt Liotta

On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 *nods*  I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago.   
 Unfortunately
 they only have like 3 participants.

 Despite their lower participant numbers, I'm looking to join non- 
 Equinix
 exchanges here in Chicago (Any2 and ChicagoIX).

We are members of Any2 in DC, which has very few members and we only  
see about 100Kbps of traffic. I wouldn't waste your time.

 The place I get colo, etc. from in 350 E. Cermak offers a free 100 meg
 connection to ChicagoIX if you're a colo customer and most of the  
 members
 are on their route server.

 Just for general knowledge, how do some of the others relate on price
 compared to Equinix (assuming cheaper) and Any2 (assuming around the  
 same)?

Any2 is the best deal around, but only on the west coast is there any  
traffic. Big Apple, Nap of the Americas, and Seattle are cheap and  
useful. Not that we are members of any of them.

We will be probably join some additional exchanges in other markets  
when we have customers there. We have other ISPs buying transit and  
voice from us that put us in markets without a wireless footprint.  
Chicago is on our radar, but thus far none of the ISPs we have talked  
to have pulled the trigger.

-Matt




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/