And yet another point of view:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061016/nichols
Yes, there has been an "Abolish the FCC" movement alive for at least 10
and probably 20 years. FOMHR (For Our Many Happy Readers) here are two
(of the many) points of view:
http://news.com.com/2010-1028-5226979.ht
Yes, there has been an "Abolish the FCC" movement alive for at least 10
and probably 20 years. FOMHR (For Our Many Happy Readers) here are two
(of the many) points of view:
http://news.com.com/2010-1028-5226979.html
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2005/05/b677863.html
jack
Peter R.
Sorry to answer my own post but some clarifications are in order. I am
not trying to state that I am satisfied, in any way, with the FCC by my
desire to keep them intact. I am only stating that I do not think it is
within the power of our own government to produce a different regulatory
framew
Killing the FCC would simply place the responsibility for the regulatory
control of the spectrum in the US to another federal agency. Not sure I
buy into the idea that one fed agency (even if created from scratch) can
do things better than what we have now.
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
You know th
yeah, this has been going on for quite a while now (this is the second
round). So far the FCC has held up.
I think we should contact the CTIA and see what we can do to lend support to
them (and the FCC) on this issue. Anyone have any thoughts on the issue
and/or know anyone?
laters,
marlon
You know that if they don't want to give up the raw data that they have
fudged the heck out of it!
It has been suggested by many folks, including Peter Huber, that it
might be time to put the FCC out to pasture.
- Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://
