Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Mike Hammett]

http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/live-from-ctia-with-fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski/

That's the closest I know of.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: "Forbes Mercy" 
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 11:03:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells


If anyone has first hand knowledge of this announcement please let us know, the 
FCC Committee Meeting is in progress right now and we'd sure like to have an 
accurate basis for discussion on if the 3550 is going away from us. 

Thanks, 
Forbes 

On 5/8/2012 8:46 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: 


Not much details offered. I assume theyll auction it 

Sent from my Motorola Startac... 



On May 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Doug Clark" < d...@txox.com > wrote: 








elaborate please. That freq was slated to #1 to be auctioned off or the FCC 2nd 
choice was to include it in the licensed lite band.. 





---Original Message--- 


From: Gino Villarini 
Date: 5/8/2012 9:34:02 AM 
To: WISPA General List ; a...@afmug.com 
Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells 

WTF... 

Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells 

Sent from a Apple Newton 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 






___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



No virus found in this message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4985 - Release Date: 05/08/12 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Forbes Mercy]

If anyone has first hand knowledge of this announcement please let us 
know, the FCC Committee Meeting is in progress right now and we'd sure 
like to have an accurate basis for discussion on if the 3550 is going 
away from us.


Thanks,
Forbes

On 5/8/2012 8:46 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:

Not much details offered. I assume theyll auction it

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On May 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Doug Clark" > wrote:


elaborate please.  That freq was slated to #1 to be auctioned off or 
the FCC 2nd choice was to include it in the licensed lite band..

/---Original Message---/
/*From:*/ Gino Villarini 
/*Date:*/ 5/8/2012 9:34:02 AM
/*To:*/ WISPA General List ; a...@afmug.com 


/*Subject:*/ [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells
WTF...
Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells
Sent from a Apple Newton
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4985 - Release Date: 05/08/12



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Gino Villarini]

May now... He was talking about Spectrum Sharing with Goverment

Sent from my Motorola Startac... 


On May 8, 2012, at 10:49 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Copy and paste from Steve's February 20th post on this topic:
> 
> 3550-3650 MHz
> 
> Earlier versions of both the Senate and House versions would have required 
> the FCC to auction the 3550-3650 MHz band (with certain exceptions), which is 
> currently used by the Department of Defense and is not allocated for 
> commercial use.  WISPA argued that this band should be made available for 
> unlicensed use given the coastal exclusion zones identified in NTIA's report, 
> which depicted areas that could be affected by shipborne radar if certain 
> high-power, WiMax, mobile technology were used.  We also stated that mobile 
> interests had gone on record at the FCC as saying they did not want this 
> band, that NTIA used flawed assumptions and that WISPs were interested in the 
> spectrum because of its proximity to the 3650-3700 MHz band.  We also believe 
> that sharing with Federal radar is possible (through databases, sensing, 
> etc.) if the 3650-3700 MHz technical rules are applied.  Sharing should be 
> made easier if the technical rules are based on low-power, fixed operations.
> 
> 
> 
> The final version removed the auction mandate, but requires NTIA to give 
> priority to options involving exclusive non-Federal use and shall choose 
> sharing only if NTIA and OMB determine that relocation of a Federal user is 
> not feasible because of technical or cost constraints.  Thus, the 3550-3650 
> MHz band could be subject to auction ("exclusive use") unless it is not 
> feasible to relocate Federal users and, if that's the case, commercial and 
> Federal users could share the band under technical rules the FCC would adopt. 
>  The radar uses in the 3550-3650 MHz band may be difficult to relocate, which 
> would make the case for shared unlicensed use easier.  We'll be looking at 
> this closely.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gino Villarini" 
> To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 10:33:36 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells
> 
> WTF...
> 
> Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells
> 
> Sent from a Apple Newton
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Mike Hammett]

Copy and paste from Steve's February 20th post on this topic:

3550-3650 MHz

Earlier versions of both the Senate and House versions would have required the 
FCC to auction the 3550-3650 MHz band (with certain exceptions), which is 
currently used by the Department of Defense and is not allocated for commercial 
use.  WISPA argued that this band should be made available for unlicensed use 
given the coastal exclusion zones identified in NTIA's report, which depicted 
areas that could be affected by shipborne radar if certain high-power, WiMax, 
mobile technology were used.  We also stated that mobile interests had gone on 
record at the FCC as saying they did not want this band, that NTIA used flawed 
assumptions and that WISPs were interested in the spectrum because of its 
proximity to the 3650-3700 MHz band.  We also believe that sharing with Federal 
radar is possible (through databases, sensing, etc.) if the 3650-3700 MHz 
technical rules are applied.  Sharing should be made easier if the technical 
rules are based on low-power, fixed operations.



The final version removed the auction mandate, but requires NTIA to give 
priority to options involving exclusive non-Federal use and shall choose 
sharing only if NTIA and OMB determine that relocation of a Federal user is not 
feasible because of technical or cost constraints.  Thus, the 3550-3650 MHz 
band could be subject to auction ("exclusive use") unless it is not feasible to 
relocate Federal users and, if that's the case, commercial and Federal users 
could share the band under technical rules the FCC would adopt.  The radar uses 
in the 3550-3650 MHz band may be difficult to relocate, which would make the 
case for shared unlicensed use easier.  We'll be looking at this closely.




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini" 
To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 10:33:36 AM
Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

WTF...

Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells

Sent from a Apple Newton

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Gino Villarini]

Not much details offered. I assume theyll auction it

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On May 8, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Doug Clark" mailto:d...@txox.com>> 
wrote:

elaborate please.  That freq was slated to #1 to be auctioned off or the FCC 
2nd choice was to include it in the licensed lite band..




---Original Message---

From: Gino Villarini
Date: 5/8/2012 9:34:02 AM
To: WISPA General List;  
a...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

WTF...

Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells

Sent from a Apple Newton

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Doug Clark]

elaborate please.  That freq was slated to #1 to be auctioned off or the FCC
2nd choice was to include it in the licensed lite band.. 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Gino Villarini
Date: 5/8/2012 9:34:02 AM
To: WISPA General List;  a...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells
 
WTF...
 
Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells
 
Sent from a Apple Newton
 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

[Mike Hammett]

Didn't they say they didn't want 3.5 GHz?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini" 
To: "WISPA General List" , a...@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 10:33:36 AM
Subject: [WISPA] CTIA keynote Genachosky 3.5 ghz for small cells

WTF...

Just announced that 100+ MHz on 3.5 ghz will be for Small Cells

Sent from a Apple Newton

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless