Ralph wrote:
whatever
roo-tenna or tupperware box
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
09, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Mike Hammett wrote:
I know Mikrotik has been getting beat up over not having it.
I guess I wasn't paying attention.
Pretty much any reason they stated why they couldn't do it was
refuted by seemingly
@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
If a radio had a design like listen before transmit for clear airspace
and only transmit when the clock says I can then it could be used in any
band including all of 3650. What would
What exactly does this translate to?
106 Id. Specifically, the Commission permitted systems using sectorized
antennas to operate with an aggregate
transmit output power transmitted simultaneously on all beams of up to 8 dB
above the limit for an individual
beam. Id.
-
Mike Hammett
Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I personally wish all manufacturers would
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
What exactly does this translate to?
106 Id. Specifically, the Commission
, allowing all the
towers to stay fairly in sync.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael J. Erskine
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 3:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
All
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
Actually, they have implemented a CSMA/CA bypass on their new 3.0 beta
versions, using their NStreme Polling protocol.
Cool.
GPS Sync has been very high up on their list, however, the issue at the
moment is that conventional serial GPS units lack the necessary timing
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Mike Hammett wrote:
I know Mikrotik has been getting beat up over not having it.
I guess I wasn't paying attention.
Pretty much any reason they stated
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Mike Hammett wrote:
I know Mikrotik has been getting beat up over not having it.
I guess I wasn't paying attention.
Pretty much any reason they stated why they couldn't do it was
refuted by seemingly knowledgeable people
: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
GPS Sync has been very high up on their list, however, the issue at the
moment is that conventional serial GPS units lack the necessary timing
precision for anything other than raw timesync.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe
Why do you say this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Within a few months the whole MT certified
'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
GPS Sync has been very high up on their list, however, the issue at the
moment is that conventional serial GPS units lack the necessary timing
precision for anything other than raw timesync.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Within a few months the whole MT certified system will
be a non-issue.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
, 2007 7:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph,
I think there is a committee gathering information on the most common
hardware configurations to get something certified for Mikrotik.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Ralph wrote:
Why do
to whoever it really was who
said it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Erskine
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 7:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph;
Why bother? Tell us
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 7:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph,
I think there is a committee gathering information
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Mike Hammett wrote:
The N-Streme protocol has been around for a while and supports polling
and resolves many disadvantages in WIFI. N-Streme may not be able to
work in 3.6 GHz as it may not be wifi enough. They could couple
] FCC 3650 band response today..
Why do you say this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Within
, June 09, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph,
I have to agree that even if there is a certified system in the works this
will not make ALL Mikrotik installations certified. There will most likely
be some uncertified gear left in the field as I
09, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph,
I have to agree that even if there is a certified system in the works
this will not make ALL Mikrotik installations certified. There will
most likely be some uncertified gear left in the field as I
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message - From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Ralph,
I have to agree that even
, 2007 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
How difficult is it to engineer sectors with greater isolation? With only
50 MHz, we're going to have to become champions of spectrum reuse.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
How difficult is it to engineer sectors with greater isolation? With only
50 MHz, we're going to have to become champions of spectrum reuse.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL
I personally wish all manufacturers would standardize on a GPS sync
system to allow for multiple reuse of frequencies. This is one place
where Motorola definitely has the right idea. I have never seen a
convincing argument for any reason why GPS sync is not a great thing for
reuse of spectrum
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I
DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I personally
John;
John Scrivner wrote:
I personally wish all manufacturers would standardize on a GPS sync
system to allow for multiple reuse of frequencies. This is one place
where Motorola definitely has the right idea. I have never seen a
convincing argument for any reason why GPS sync is not a great
28 matches
Mail list logo
