Yep, at the expense of the many for the benefit of the few, IMHO.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:32:10 -0500
Basically, except for a few viable
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
What brands did you test? Mainnet's worked as promised for us. No, it
was not 500Mbps but 20
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Chuck,
It's as though you didnt read my post!
BPL works - with acceptable interference - I saw it with my own eyes
along with dozens of skeptical ham operators. Theory does
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant impedance to RF. Nor are
they balanced
by the press.
Which one of these are we talking about here?
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Chuck,
It's as though you didnt read my post!
BPL
How about BPL to transport data to the ap's?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet
: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Brian,
I'd rather go with this from Motorola:
http://www.motorola.com/Business/US-EN/Business+Product+and+Services/Private
+Broadband+Networks
Basically it's a DSL type system... reuse the CAT3 wiring in the building
To clarify, by real interference I meant they are no worse than
anything else we deal with. Like any RF transmission, there are
emmisions, but those can be dealt with just like the way we (WISP's)
deal with them. The ARRL made a mountain out of molehill and it was
all political as far as I'm
: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
Brian
. Nothing more. On the secondary side it is nothing more than
homeplug. That is viable and deployed and does just fine.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
To clarify, by real interference I meant they are no worse than
anything else we deal with. Like any RF transmission, there are
emmisions, but those can be dealt with just like the way
that is absolutely necessary in the event of an emergency.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I disagree. I personally saw BPL work and work very well. As far
valuable spectrum that is absolutely necessary in the event of an emergency.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I disagree. I personally saw BPL work
a HV system that works as advertised.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Chuck,
It's as though you didnt read my post!
BPL works - with acceptable
:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant impedance to RF. Nor are
they balanced. This is like trying to pump natural gas down the water
lines.
Pipe, right? What's the problem?
It is never going to ever work as well as balanced
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Chuck,
It's as though you didnt read my post!
BPL works - with acceptable interference - I saw it with my own eyes
along with dozens of skeptical ham operators. Theory does not matter
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
Brian
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Wireless has it's obvious advantages but if you go the BPL route you
can use the Motorola product. Just be sure your not going through mroe
than one distribution panel. To be honest, depending on the wiring,
you may be able to get through a couple of panels.
-RickG
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:09
I would put up an AP.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Wireless has it's obvious advantages but if you go the BPL route you
can use the Motorola
Rohrbacher
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
Brian
List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
yet? Maybe beam in some high speed and then go to the community or
subdivision
: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
Brian
WISPA
hi Brian,
Just curious why you wouldn't go with a wired solution? Seems like a
$200 switch and a box of Cat5 would be an easy fix. Suppose you would
want to add some wifi support to it, also. (Open-Mesh, StarOS, or
Mikrotik?)
One item I picked up from the original media article was that
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
yet? Maybe beam in some high speed and then go to the community or
subdivision
on
it.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
You are correct, electric companies saw huge benefits for internal use
but the real reason it did not move forward was because electric companies
are conservative by nature and they didnt like the heat coming from the
ARRL over interference issues, which btw were not real.
The interference is
- LinkTechs.net
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
yet? Maybe beam in some high speed and then go to the community or
subdivision
.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:10 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
When I
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
yet? Maybe beam in some high speed
When I was involved with BPL (back then known as PLC), all I ever
heard was HAM radio interference.
-RickG
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Jeff Broadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081112/tec_broadband_over_power_lines.html?.v=6
Jeff Broadwick
Sales Manager, ImageStream
30 matches
Mail list logo
