Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't it be better if both cable and
telco could compete in each others markets?
George
Peter R. wrote:
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
As quoted from another article;
Cable rates have risen 93% since 1990, and consumers should benefit
from more competition."
Like
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
As quoted from another article;
Cable rates have risen 93% since 1990, and consumers should benefit
from more competition."
Like we have benefited from phone competition and our local rates are so low.
DBS is cheaper -- but it has not affected the broadcast TV rates.
As quoted from another article;
"The congressional grilling will be of interest to investors in more
than just AT&T and Verizon. Comcast (nasdaq: CMCSA - news - people
), Time Warner (nyse: TWX - news - people ), Cablevision (nyse: CVC
- news - people ), Liberty Global (nasdaq: LB
Like, its fair to break anti-trust laws, and subsidize broadband sales by
TV and phone revenue.
Not sure, why Verizon doesn't cry, they are just a data provider, and set up
Video feeds in another state, and bill/deliver TV over another company name?
Oh yeah, thats right, then they can't bundl
