sector power?
Not only that but the systems tend to work much nicer when they are run
within the design specs
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Not only that but the systems tend to work much nicer when they are run
within the design specs
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum
At 6/26/2010 12:55 AM, Jack Unger wrote:
Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
too. Remember that even receive-only
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
CPE to AP is PtP. AP to CPE is PtMP.
This was prior to "smart AP's" and the AP 120 deg or less beamwidth
rule.
RickG wrote:
Does the FCC take its cues from the IRS? :)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:43 AM,
At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
too. Remember that even receive-only satellite Earth stations
required licenses in the days before DBS.
] Maximum sector power?
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
CPE to AP is PtP. AP to CPE is PtMP.
This was prior to smart AP's and the AP 120 deg or less beamwidth rule.
RickG wrote:
Does the FCC take its cues from the IRS? :)
On Thu, Jun
, 2010 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
CPE to AP is PtP. AP to CPE is PtMP.
This was prior to smart AP's and the AP 120 deg or less beamwidth rule.
RickG wrote:
Does the FCC
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 12:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
Stick with the rules, dude. You'll still get customers and you'll still
make money.
One FCC visit can
: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 09:32 AM, Bob West wrote:
Man, that's ugly. I've never tested the spread of the older nanos, the
new M series look as if they stay where you put them though. But
that's a mess...
Sure is. I smell hardware. Looking at the plot over time
with that?
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 12:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
Stick
Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
too. Remember that even receive-only satellite Earth
How about the age old, if your AP talks to one client at a time, then it is a
ptp system. Much more so now with scheduling and UBNT's AirMax. I'm still on
the talk about a 120* or less allows you to increase beyond 36 on each end. The
talk was coming from the FCC a few years back from people
Or you can be legit in Canada, and go for 3.65 GHz and get up to 57 dBM legally
in rural areas ;)
Courtesy of the guy that changed the rules for 3.65 in Canada and is looking
for the US to do the same...
F.
On 2010-06-23, at 5:41 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
I'm just a little confused about
I see negligible difference in signal strength anyway between 20 and 27.
-- Original Message --
From: Francois Menard fmen...@xittel.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:03:59 -0400
Or you can be legit in Canada,
Now, do this. Take a Mikrotik, set the transmitting antenna to A, and
put your smaller sector up, then put on the B connector the largest
sector you can find. :) That work?
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies,
FYI.
Please make sure that you are running the most recent version 5.2 on the M
series... Older firmware had known issues in setting up the output power.
Faisal
On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Stuart Pierce spie...@avolve.net wrote:
I see negligible difference in signal strength anyway
We had a discussion about this on the ubnt board. I have a pair of nanobridge M
units. No difference was shown with an increase or decrease in power. I did
notice at a certain point that after a day the units would completely stop
transmitting. A reboot would fix it.
Sent from my iPhone
On
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
Do not forget OOB and the likes. I have been using AirView for a while
to check on my sites and some were unacceptable to me (5mhz but still
hitting 10 or 20mhz at -85) so I replaced the cards
] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
Do not forget OOB and the likes. I have been using AirView for a while
to check on my sites and some were unacceptable to me (5mhz but still
hitting 10 or 20mhz at -85) so
: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
sectors
to limit the power on the radios to 17db they seem to act better then
setting them to 20.
Oddly enough much stronger signal's at 17 than at 20..
We have one site where we have
22:53:23 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
sectors
to limit the power on the radios to 17db they seem to act better then
setting them to 20.
Oddly enough
Does the FCC take its cues from the IRS? :)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
The PtP/PtMP distinction does create interesting ambiguity. But then
My favorite ambiguity is whether the PtP/PtMP distinction applies to
the full-duplex system or per traffic
/blog
Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:53:23 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
We are running RocketM2
: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:53:34 -0400
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
Not to argue your point as I agree with you but how do you know your
running it at 100%? Just cause
That's a basic question.
From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
What individual WISP operators actually do in practice is anybody's guess.
The majority of WISP operators are mature, responsible people. They
strive to do the right thing
That's a basic question.
From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
What individual WISP operators actually do in practice is anybody's guess.
The majority of WISP operators are mature, responsible people. They
strive to do the right thing
And when the FCC comes knocking, you can always point to the other guy
and say but he's worse!
Or not...
Randy
On 6/23/2010 3:59 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
That's a basic question.
From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
What individual
Stick with the rules, dude. You'll still get customers and you'll still
make money.
One FCC visit can ruin your day,
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred R. Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:41 PM
At 6/24/2010 12:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
Stick with the rules, dude. You'll still get customers and you'll still
make money.
One FCC visit can ruin your day,
Oh, I intend to advise my clients to stick with the rules, and I
design networks accordingly. I'm just a little surprised at how easy
The PtP/PtMP distinction does create interesting ambiguity. But then
My favorite ambiguity is whether the PtP/PtMP distinction applies to
the full-duplex system or per traffic direction... one reading would
say that an uplink(Customer - WISP) that is made using directive
antennas can follow
We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
sectors
to limit the power on the radios to 17db they seem to act better then
setting them to 20.
Oddly enough much stronger signal's at 17 than at 20..
We have one site where we have the radios set to 13 and they work
Do not forget OOB and the likes. I have been using AirView for a while
to check on my sites and some were unacceptable to me (5mhz but still
hitting 10 or 20mhz at -85) so I replaced the cards (all MT sites). I
am unsure if the cards are bad, going bad, or just how they were
working from day one.
32 matches
Mail list logo
