Sounds like it to me but taxation without representation has been accepted
for years. Any progressive tax system (like the US) with different rates for
different incomes is taxation without representation. Governments can do
whatever they want unless there's a sufficient number of objectors to
On top of that, the building probably has a higher tax rate due to it not
being a residence therefore not qualifying for housing credits.
Needless to say that is the fact most places if not many of us would be able
to cast votes in many locations.
As a business owner your only chance of being
Steve Barnes wrote:
On top of that, the building probably has a higher tax rate due to it not
being a residence therefore not qualifying for housing credits.
Needless to say that is the fact most places if not many of us would be able
to cast votes in many locations.
As a business owner
Similarly, how do I represent myself on the death/inheritance tax
situation when that tax affects me?
On 7/28/08 9:43 AM, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to share this scenario and see if it's the same around the
country, or just here.
We own the building our office
I ran into something vaguely similar in frustration level in two nearby
towns.
Both of them start with declaring that the city has sufficient competitive
communications infrastructure and that the purpose of the regulations are to
prevent further unsightly development.
It defines anything
