Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-12 Thread Tom DeReggi
:31 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance No, not 48V yet. We are very happy with the current stuff, especially since they handle 2 SR9 and 2 WLM54 cards. Any power supply gets a lot of testing by me before I commit to it. I only change when there is a good reason and simply because

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-12 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Lonnie Nunweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:31 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance No, not 48V yet. We are very happy with the current stuff

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-05 Thread Cliff Leboeuf
CW, Did anyone offer their experiences on the SR9's as you asked below? Maybe I missed them. :( - Cliff On 8/31/06 4:05 PM, cw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone getting satisfactory performance with SR9s on WAR boards? If so, what antennas are you using for base station and subscriber end?

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-05 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
We have not finished testing yet so we are keeping a bit quiet. I do not wish to promote this until I know for sure it is reliable. I can say that initial testing shows much better results than cw is seeing. Of course we do not use omnis and coat hangers but rather PacWireless 9 dB, 11 dB and

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-05 Thread cw
Thanks for the info, Lonnie. The coathangers came after we couldn't make PacWireless sector panels, omnis or yagis work. Four radios on one WAR4 surprises me. Thought that was too much power consumption. You're using yagis for the base station broadcast? Which one/s? Can anyone point me at

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-05 Thread George Rogato
I've been holding off on the SR9's till I heard more and lonnie has had time to figure out what changes need to be made. Also I'm waiting on pac wireless 900 rootennas to make life easy. Sometimes it's better to wait. George cw wrote: Thanks for the info, Lonnie. The coathangers came after

Re: [WISPA] SR9 Performance

2006-09-05 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
As I said we are using 9 dB, 11 dB and 13 dB yagis. We are in test mode so we are trying all of them for all locations so that we can find the best combination for the task. I am not at the point yet where I can give advice for which type to use for a certain task. There are still combinations

RE: [WISPA] SR9 performance

2006-05-18 Thread Rick Smith
Someone mentioned that in their testing TX was in a 10 mhz channel and RX was 5 MHZ (or however you set) Either way, it wasn't setting it for the same width baed on what you pick - i.e. it was 5/10 10/10 and 20/10mhz respectively. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [WISPA] SR9 performance

2006-05-18 Thread danlist
: RE: [WISPA] SR9 performance Someone mentioned that in their testing TX was in a 10 mhz channel and RX was 5 MHZ (or however you set) Either way, it wasn't setting it for the same width baed on what you pick - i.e. it was 5/10 10/10 and 20/10mhz respectively. From: [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] SR9 performance

2006-05-18 Thread rabbtux rabbtux
Did you folks finally get some SR9s to test? How are your initial results On 5/18/06, Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone mentioned that in their testing TX was in a 10 mhz channel and RX was 5 MHZ (or however you set) Either way, it wasn't setting it for the same width baed on

RE: [WISPA] SR9 performance

2006-05-18 Thread Rick Smith
Dan's got some. I'm awaiting 6, but I hear I won't be getting them till Mid-June. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:09 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] SR9 performance Did you