Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-18 Thread Mike Hammett
For an idea of antenna size...  look at a TV antenna.  Same band, same size 
antenna for same gain.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:45 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

 Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
 for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.

 I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to be
 huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
 CPE Panel size. Going from a 15 Panel to a 20 panel gives us a lot
 more wind issues at the client.

 Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
 appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.

 We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
 now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get rave
 reviews.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

 I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
 backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
 this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-18 Thread Steve Barnes
That's scary.  And that's only a receiver antenna.  So are we looking at
an extra trailer behind our install trucks to carry an 8ft x 6ft yagi as
well as 10 foot tv tower sections to get it up high enough and away from
the house.

Steve Barnes
RCWiFi Wireless Internet 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

For an idea of antenna size...  look at a TV antenna.  Same band, same
size 
antenna for same gain.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:45 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

 Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still
available
 for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.

 I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to
be
 huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
 CPE Panel size. Going from a 15 Panel to a 20 panel gives us a lot
 more wind issues at the client.

 Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
 appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.

 We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
 now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get
rave
 reviews.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

 I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
 backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
 this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-18 Thread John Valenti
Could you elaborate on why this is a bad idea?

I'm slightly interested in it for low cost connections.  In my current  
area, I don't have a problem finding grain legs for AP sites. These  
would be dense enough that I could build a great network with white  
spaces cells and 5GHz backhauls.

But if I look farther north in Michigan, the forests are denser and  
the grain legs disappear. The terrain is flat enough that I can't use  
mountains for cheap tower sites. And none of the 900-2.4-3.65-5GHz  
radios are going thru the trees.

It seems like a PtP backhaul that would work ten(?) miles thru trees  
would be a great cost savings over building towers. Maybe use two  
channels for full duplex. The rural areas that I'm looking at have  
over twenty channels free. (thanks Brian Webster for your kmz!)


On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:28 PM, John Scrivner wrote:

 We have been fighting it. Towerstream seems to have somehow created a
 perception that they are justified in this desire to set aside TVWS  
 spectrum
 for this inefficient use. We have been fighting it and we will  
 continue to
 do so.
 Scriv


 On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP  
 backhaul
 operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...   
 Is this
 at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-18 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
Wonder why it attached the reply...

- Original Message - 
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-18 Thread Blair Davis




At these freqs, 75ohn RG6 cable is usable with reasonable loss. maybe
75ohm cpe is the way to go...

Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:

  75 ohms.
Someone will spin 50 ohm models.  
Or just put up with the minor VSWR.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Blair Davis 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul


  Look at the BLONDER TONGUE BTY-10-U UHF single channel units

  Third photo down on the left.

  I'd look hard at these as CPE antennas...



  Steve Barnes wrote: 
That's scary.  And that's only a receiver antenna.  So are we looking at
an extra trailer behind our install trucks to carry an 8ft x 6ft yagi as
well as 10 foot tv tower sections to get it up high enough and away from
the house.

Steve Barnes
RCWiFi Wireless Internet 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

For an idea of antenna size...  look at a TV antenna.  Same band, same
size 
antenna for same gain.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Steve Barnes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:45 PM
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

  Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still
available
  for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.

I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to
be
  huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
CPE Panel size. Going from a 15" Panel to a 20" panel gives us a lot
more wind issues at the client.

Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.

We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get
rave
  reviews.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On
  Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





  
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


  

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  



--




  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wir

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread John Scrivner
We have been fighting it. Towerstream seems to have somehow created a
perception that they are justified in this desire to set aside TVWS spectrum
for this inefficient use. We have been fighting it and we will continue to
do so.
Scriv


On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP backhaul
 operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is this
 at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread Steve Barnes
Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.  

I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to be
huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
CPE Panel size. Going from a 15 Panel to a 20 panel gives us a lot
more wind issues at the client.

Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.  

We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get rave
reviews.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread Blair Davis




At these freqs, I'd suspect that yagi's will be the best choice for
cpe's.

Steve Barnes wrote:

  Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.  

I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to be
huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
CPE Panel size. Going from a 15" Panel to a 20" panel gives us a lot
more wind issues at the client.

Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.  

We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get rave
reviews.

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread Josh Luthman
I don't recall the exact length but we have an enormous fiberglass 450
mhz omni on our tower.  At least 12 ft and it withstood the hurricane
of Ohio with 60 mph winds a few months back.

On 11/17/08, Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
 for PTP.  700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.

 I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to be
 huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?  I am also concerned about the
 CPE Panel size. Going from a 15 Panel to a 20 panel gives us a lot
 more wind issues at the client.

 Don't get me wrong I am excited about the whitespace out come.  I
 appreciated the work of the Whitespace committee.

 We have tower owners who are concerned about the sizes of our antennas
 now.  Change from a 12 foot 900 Omni to a 16+ foot 700 will not get rave
 reviews.

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:35 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

 I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP
 backhaul operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is
 this at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread John Scrivner

 I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.  Aren't sectors going to be
 huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?


To be clear, TVWS is different than 700 MHz. The 700 MHz band sold at
auction. TVWS is lower in frequency which will mean even larger antennas for
equivalent gain. The physics of it all do not change. The size will be what
it is for the gain you want. It is easy to envision we will see 1 watt
radios with 6 db antennas which related to 4 watts EIRP. Even at the lower
frequencies the 6 db antenna will be a manageable size. I am guessing the
best systems will have lower radio power and higher antenna gain in order to
increase receive sensitivity (with very large antennas). These are just my
thoughts though.


  I am also concerned about the
 CPE Panel size. Going from a 15 Panel to a 20 panel gives us a lot
 more wind issues at the client.


Once again, the physics determine the size antenna required for a given
gain. At the lower TV frequencies the ability to produce higher power radios
at lower cost should offset likely reduced antenna gains.
Scriv



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul

2008-11-17 Thread reader
I've got territory ranging from a town of 35K to open wheat fields to 
rolling to tall mountains heavily forested.

I can find no particular need for, and in fact, find that low frequency 
backhauls are at least sometimes self-defeating, due to huge Fresnel zones, 
for instance.   What I need, in particular, is smallish cells that are 
good for 1-4 miles and go through lots of trees and don't need to be mounted 
high above the ground.

I also need the same 1-2 mile wide cells that can go through urban, heavily 
tree'd areas, where I can't have tall masts or CPE antennas.What I need 
for backhauls is stuff that's good for 10 to 30 miles w/20 to 30 mbit 
throughput capability.

And, I need at least 8, prefer 10 to 15 mbit total capacity per AP, though I 
expect only 3-15 clients per AP.I need QOS which gives me good VOIP call 
quality and the ability to control bandwidth at the CPE end.


And I need to be able to install this with cpe cost under 300 dollars.   And 
AP cost less than 500.


I've been using Ubiquiti 900 stuff for some of this, but it has serious 
limitations at 900 mhz.



insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:34 PM
Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul


I keep seeing desire to have a special category set aside for PtP backhaul 
operations in the whitespaces.

 To those of you that understand the extreme rural environments...  Is this 
 at all necessary?  I don't see why it would be.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/