Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

2009-05-12 Thread Mike Hammett
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four222

You have to utilize the assignment in 3 months.
You have to currently be using 2x /24s.
You have to return your old IPs to your provider.
Some other stuff available on their web site.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 11:58 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

 I have a customer that will be multi-homed soon.  He has asked me to
 help him get ready for this move.  I will be handling his BGP and such,
 but he wants me to handle getting his IP space from ARIN as well.

 It has been about 5 years since I've dealt with them at all, and I know
 there is likely to have been some changes in the way they handle their
 business.  As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
 if you are multi-homed.  Are there other requirements that I am
 overlooking?  How hard are they to deal with in terms of getting them to
 provide you with an allocation in advance of the actual connection of
 the second circuit?  It would be nice to only have 1 renumbering in this
 process.

 -- 
 
 * Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
 * http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
 * http://www.wispa.org/ * WISPA Board Member   *
 * http://blog.butchevans.com/   * Wired or Wireless Networks   *
 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

2009-05-12 Thread David E. Smith
Butch Evans wrote:

 It has been about 5 years since I've dealt with them at all, and I know
 there is likely to have been some changes in the way they handle their
 business.  As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
 if you are multi-homed.  Are there other requirements that I am
 overlooking?  How hard are they to deal with in terms of getting them to
 provide you with an allocation in advance of the actual connection of
 the second circuit?  It would be nice to only have 1 renumbering in this
 process.


As long as your client needs that much address space, (i.e. is 
efficiently using at least a /23 or so already), ARIN is generally 
pretty easy to work with. Have your documentation together, show them 
that you know what you're talking about, and you'll get your request 
granted. As long as you're intending to multi-home, the fact that you 
haven't yet actually done so shouldn't be a problem in getting an ASN 
and a small IPv4 allocation.

They did recently introduce a new policy that IPv4 requests need to 
include a signed attestation from a corporate officer, but that's 
probably a rubber-stamp affair (and I don't think it officially takes 
effect 'til next week anyway).

Be sure to get some IPv6 space while you're there, it's free, and 
they'll need it in a couple years anyway. :)

David Smith
MVN.net




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Carullo

You must be multihomed first - they request both upstream peers and need to 
see your advertisements on the net in BGP table  My experience any 
way.

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
 From: David E. Smith d...@mvn.net
 Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:19 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN
 
 Butch Evans wrote:
 
  It has been about 5 years since I've dealt with them at all, and I 
know
  there is likely to have been some changes in the way they handle their
  business.  As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
  if you are multi-homed.  Are there other requirements that I am
  overlooking?  How hard are they to deal with in terms of getting them 
to
  provide you with an allocation in advance of the actual connection of
  the second circuit?  It would be nice to only have 1 renumbering in 
this
  process.
 
 
 As long as your client needs that much address space, (i.e. is 
 efficiently using at least a /23 or so already), ARIN is generally 
 pretty easy to work with. Have your documentation together, show them 
 that you know what you're talking about, and you'll get your request 
 granted. As long as you're intending to multi-home, the fact that you 
 haven't yet actually done so shouldn't be a problem in getting an ASN 
 and a small IPv4 allocation.
 
 They did recently introduce a new policy that IPv4 requests need to 
 include a signed attestation from a corporate officer, but that's 
 probably a rubber-stamp affair (and I don't think it officially takes 
 effect 'til next week anyway).
 
 Be sure to get some IPv6 space while you're there, it's free, and 
 they'll need it in a couple years anyway. :)
 
 David Smith
 MVN.net
 
 
 
 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

2009-05-12 Thread Tom DeReggi
Butch,

Arin is really easy to deal with if you stay focused to following their 
guidelines. If you divert from the guidelines in the slightest, it can be 
difficult, because their reps are only authorized to pass through 
submissions that meet the rules and can be justified as complying. Its 
simple, it met the requirement or it didn't. Faking it is hard..

Arin will give you ANY amount of IP space that is still available, that you 
can justify that you need. Not more. They no longer require you to renumber 
smaller blocks to get one larger block, and are more likely to just assign 
you a a small block today, and a second small block later when you justify 
the need for the second block.

Multi-homing qualifies you to get a Class C (/24).  Using Multi-home 
arguement is exactly what you should do, to get their ASN, and their first 
ClassC or greater. That is NOT enough justification to ask for more than a 
/24.  The second justification is showing pre-existing 70% usage of IP 
space.  When a Class C /24 is 70% used, one can ask for a /23, etc.  So it 
is still very hard to get IP space, if you can not yet prove usage. They are 
NOT required to give you IP space for planned expansion.  That is the most 
important thing to understand.  The next jsutification is runumbering off 
your existing upstream ISP, regardless of whether they do or not. For 
example, if they have a /23 from their upstream 70% used, they can say they 
now qualify for a /22, and plan to renumber and return the /23 to their 
upstream within 90 days.  (They do not check in 90 days, but before they 
give you the next allocation, they will make sure you can prove need again, 
and confirm that you have renumbered if that was part of your 
justification.)They will not usually bend on the 70% usage to prove 
need, when you take the path justifying IPs based on need.  If you follow 
the previous advise your allocation will be super fast within days.  The 
last method is to prove unique network need. That is much harder, as it is 
not defined what unique network need is.  And it will have to be a true 
justifyable network need. For example, your upstream saying they wont 
announce anything smaller than a /22 is NOT a unique need, they'll tell you 
to change providers. For example, saying you serve 5 cities and prefer to 
have 5 class Cs, one for each city, is NOT a network need on its own. 
However, if you can prove that you have 5 different Transit connections (or 
orders for service) in 5 cities, and will run BGP in each city, it will be a 
justified network need, as BGP requires a minimum of class C for 
advertising, and each city would have different routing rules.  Lastly, to 
get IP space, the ISP must be fully clear of any judgements from the States 
or Feds. For example, if any overdue income tax or property tax, or 
suspended license, would disqualify your applciation for IP space.

My advise is only ask for what you can justiy according to the above rules. 
If you can't, they are not ready for their own IPs. If it cant be justified 
to ask for what the client wants, then the IPs can be asked for in stages. 
You pay per year for IP space, NOT per request, and NOT per block.  It costs 
the same $2500 to have 32 class Cs, whether its one large /19 or eight /22s.

Now the reality is... if you have small IP allocations, it could be a pain 
for getting them routed by your upstream. For example some tier1s like to 
filter out announcements smaller than /20s.
However, some ISPs prefer to filter out announcements for blocks smaller 
than the top level block. Meaning theyll accept a /22 if that was the 
allocation, but not accept the two /21s inside it.
Because of this, it can actually be beneficial to have two smaller blocks, 
that are indivividually allocated in some cases.

ARIN will verify your stated IP usage. By either of the two methods you 
select in the application.

As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
 if you are multi-homed

That may be possible, but you still will have to justify why you need a /22 
over just a /23.  Part of the justification can be the number of IPs that 
you will need in the following 3 months, but you'll need to prove that also. 
Getting 70% usage of /23 justifys a /22.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:58 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Today's ARIN


I have a customer that will be multi-homed soon.  He has asked me to
 help him get ready for this move.  I will be handling his BGP and such,
 but he wants me to handle getting his IP space from ARIN as well.

 It has been about 5 years since I've dealt with them at all, and I know
 there is likely to have been some changes in the way they handle their
 business.  As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
 if you are multi-homed.  Are there other requirements that I am
 

Re: [WISPA] Today's ARIN

2009-05-11 Thread Scott Carullo

Its getting harder and they just changed the criteria cause they are 
running out of space.  actually its just a signed piece of paper from 
company owner saying they in fact do need the ips.  But they require 
complete documentation of how you will use them all...Also I do not 
believe you can get smaller than /21 and you have to justify more than half 
of it to be used right away.  You also have to give back any ips you have 
been assigned by your upstream providers as part of the deal if they grant 
your request.

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
 From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
 Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:58 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Today's ARIN
 
 I have a customer that will be multi-homed soon.  He has asked me to
 help him get ready for this move.  I will be handling his BGP and such,
 but he wants me to handle getting his IP space from ARIN as well.  
 
 It has been about 5 years since I've dealt with them at all, and I know
 there is likely to have been some changes in the way they handle their
 business.  As I understand it, you can get as small as a /22 from them
 if you are multi-homed.  Are there other requirements that I am
 overlooking?  How hard are they to deal with in terms of getting them to
 provide you with an allocation in advance of the actual connection of
 the second circuit?  It would be nice to only have 1 renumbering in this
 process.
 
 -- 
 
 * Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
 * http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
 * http://www.wispa.org/ * WISPA Board Member   *
 * http://blog.butchevans.com/   * Wired or Wireless Networks   *
 
 
 
 
 
 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/