Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Doug Clark
I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 
they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
not think you have anything
to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and
I was able to get close to 16 megs! 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Carl Shivers
Date: 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs; 1,3
5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we can
get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our customers
would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the 5 and 10
Mbps circuits.
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Josh Luthman
 I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with
a KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs!

5mhz channel?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:

 I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and
 they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
 not think you have anything
 to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
 using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and
 I was able to get close to 16 megs!




  *---Original Message---*

  *From:* Carl Shivers cshiv...@aristotle.net
 *Date:* 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
 *To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 *Subject:* [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs


 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we
 can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
 customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the
 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Steve Barnes
Does the M365 force AirMax?

Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a 
 KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs!

5mhz channel?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark 
d...@txox.commailto:d...@txox.com wrote:
I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and
they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do not 
think you have anything
to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and 
using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and
I was able to get close to 16 megs!




---Original Message---

From: Carl Shiversmailto:cshiv...@aristotle.net
Date: 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'mailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs; 1,3,5 
and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we can get on 
each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our customers would be in 
the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.








WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Yes.  Also, no 3.65 products work with other 3.65 products unless it has an
802.16 sticker on it.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:

 Does the M365 force AirMax?

 ** **

 Steve Barnes

 General Manager

 PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi http://www.rcwifi.com/

 ** **

 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
 Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
 *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
 *To:* WISPA General List

 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 ** **

  I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with
 a KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs! 


 5mhz channel?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 

 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:

 I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 

 they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
 not think you have anything

 to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
 using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and

 I was able to get close to 16 megs! 

  

  

  

  

 *---Original Message---*

  

 *From:* Carl Shivers cshiv...@aristotle.net

 *Date:* 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM

 *To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org

 *Subject:* [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

  

 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we
 can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
 customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the
 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.

  





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 ** **




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Doug Clark
No it does not.  You can turn off Airmax if you wish.  On Point to
Multi-point I would not recommend not
using Airmax though 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Steve Barnes
Date: 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
Does the M365 force AirMax?
 
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi
 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
 I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a
KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs! 

5mhz channel?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:
I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 
they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
not think you have anything
to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and
I was able to get close to 16 megs! 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Carl Shivers
Date: 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs; 1,3
5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we can
get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our customers
would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the 5 and 10
Mbps circuits.
 






-
--
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
--

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Double check your AP, Doug.  You can't uncheck AirMax.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:

 No it does not.  You can turn off Airmax if you wish.  On Point to
 Multi-point I would not recommend not
 using Airmax though




  *---Original Message---*

  *From:* Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
 *Date:* 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
 *To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs


 Does the M365 force AirMax?

 ** **

 Steve Barnes

 General Manager

 PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi http://www.rcwifi.com/

 ** **

 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
 Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
 *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
 *To:* WISPA General List
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 ** **

  I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with
 a KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs! 


 5mhz channel?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 

 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:

 I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 

 they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
 not think you have anything

 to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
 using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and

 I was able to get close to 16 megs! 

  

  

  

  

 *---Original Message---*

  

 *From:* Carl Shivers cshiv...@aristotle.net

 *Date:* 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM

 *To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org

 *Subject:* [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

  

 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we
 can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
 customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the
 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.

  





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 ** **





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Matt Hoppes
You can upload a config file with it turned off though!


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 1/18/12 11:00 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 Double check your AP, Doug.  You can't uncheck AirMax.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com
 mailto:d...@txox.com wrote:

 No it does not.  You can turn off Airmax if you wish.  On Point to
 Multi-point I would not recommend not
 using Airmax though
 /---Original Message---/
 /*From:*/ Steve Barnes mailto:st...@pcswin.com
 /*Date:*/ 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
 /*To:*/ WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org
 /*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 Does the M365 force AirMax?

 __ __

 Steve Barnes

 General Manager

 PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi http://www.rcwifi.com/

 __ __

 *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
 *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
 *To:* WISPA General List
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 __ __

   I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a
 Nano365 with a KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs!
 


 5mhz channel?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 

 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com
 mailto:d...@txox.com wrote:

 I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 

 they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.
 I do not think you have anything

 to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just
 completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP
 reflector and

 I was able to get close to 16 megs! 

 

 

 

 

 /---Original Message---/

 

 */From:/*Carl Shivers mailto:cshiv...@aristotle.net

 */Date:/*1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM

 */To:/*'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 */Subject:/*[WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 

 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65
 APs; 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many
 clients we can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this?
 Most of our customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few
 are purchasing the 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.

 

   




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 __ __

   




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Doug Clark
Sorry,  I was looking at a M5.  Too many tests going on right now!
Josh is right.  The Airmax box is greyed out. 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Josh Luthman
Date: 1/18/2012 9:00:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
Double check your AP, Doug.  You can't uncheck AirMax.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:

No it does not.  You can turn off Airmax if you wish.  On Point to
Multi-point I would not recommend not
using Airmax though 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Steve Barnes
Date: 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
Does the M365 force AirMax?
 
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi
 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
 I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a
KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs! 

5mhz channel?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:
I load my 5 gig UBNT APS with 45 clients on a 10 meg channel and 
they all are able to pull between 18 and 24 megs down at all times.  I do
not think you have anything
to worry about even on a 5 meg channel.  I have just completed testing and
using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with a KPP reflector and
I was able to get close to 16 megs! 
 
 
 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Carl Shivers
Date: 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
 
We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs; 1,3
5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we can
get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our customers
would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the 5 and 10
Mbps circuits.
 






-
--
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
--

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 






-
--
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
--

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







  
-
--
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
--

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-18 Thread Carl Shivers
Thanks all for the info. I was out yesterday and wasn't able to respond.
Thanks again.

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Carl Shivers
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:59 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

 

We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we
can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the
5 and 10 Mbps circuits.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-17 Thread Matt Hoppes
Unfortunately you asked a question that doesn't have a great solid answer.

You're going to need to monitor throughput usage on the sector to really 
answer that question for you.

However, with that said, you can probably get upwards of 30-50 on a 
sector without issue.


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 1/17/12 10:58 AM, Carl Shivers wrote:
 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients
 we can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
 customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing
 the 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

2012-01-17 Thread Andy Trimmell
That's a pretty good range of what I've heard also. 30-50. 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs

Unfortunately you asked a question that doesn't have a great solid
answer.

You're going to need to monitor throughput usage on the sector to really

answer that question for you.

However, with that said, you can probably get upwards of 30-50 on a 
sector without issue.


Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312

On 1/17/12 10:58 AM, Carl Shivers wrote:
 We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65
APs;
 1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients
 we can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of
our
 customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are
purchasing
 the 5 and 10 Mbps circuits.








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Josh Luthman
Less coverage then 3.65 for sure.
On Jun 22, 2011 11:28 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com
wrote:
 How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
 only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
 switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.



 Thanks



 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414



 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Westlake
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.

The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see 
if 3.65GHz could handle it.

I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is 
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible.

But I get about 3Mbps throughput.

I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare 
situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the 
low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight 
NSM365.

Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.

I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK 
with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz.

On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
 only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
 switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.

 Thanks

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414

 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Josh Luthman
What was the signal of the first link in 900?
On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com wrote:
 I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.

 The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
 if 3.65GHz could handle it.

 I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
 linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
horrible.

 But I get about 3Mbps throughput.

 I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
 situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
 low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
 NSM365.

 Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.

 I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
 with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
900MHz.

 On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
 only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
 switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.

 Thanks

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414

 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
illegal.







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 --
 Simon Westlake
 si...@powercode.com
 (920) 351-1010





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Patrick D. Nix, Jr
In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65?  
Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
 

Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.

The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see 
if 3.65GHz could handle it.

I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is 
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible.

But I get about 3Mbps throughput.

I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare 
situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the 
low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight 
NSM365.

Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.

I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK 
with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz.

On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
 only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
 switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.

 Thanks

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414

 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Westlake
It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue 
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst 
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What was the signal of the first link in 900?

 On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com
 mailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
   I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
  
   The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
   if 3.65GHz could handle it.
  
   I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
   linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
 horrible.
  
   But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
  
   I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
   situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
   low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
   NSM365.
  
   Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
  
   I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
   with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
 900MHz.
  
   On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
   How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
   only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
   switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
  
   Thanks
  
   Patrick Nix, Jr.,
   Computer Network Solutions
   CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
   IT Manager
  
   http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
   http://www.csweb.net
  
   (918) 235-0414
  
   
  
   Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
   privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
   notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
   destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
   person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
   --
   Simon Westlake
   si...@powercode.com mailto:si...@powercode.com
   (920) 351-1010
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Westlake
I tested by driving my car about a mile away from the tower and holding 
an NSM365 through the sunroof of my car. I was at ~-75 or so.

I was pulling 18Mbps x 19Mbps at 10MHz channel width.

Granted this was the only SM connected to the AP at the time.

On 6/22/2011 10:52 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65? 
  Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
 Private?

 Thanks,

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than 
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Simon Westlake
 Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

 I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.

 The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
 if 3.65GHz could handle it.

 I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
 linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible.

 But I get about 3Mbps throughput.

 I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
 situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
 low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
 NSM365.

 Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.

 I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
 with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz.

 On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
 How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
 only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
 switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.

 Thanks

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414

 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Patrick D. Nix, Jr
In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65?  
Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
 

Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue 
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst 
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What was the signal of the first link in 900?

 On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com
 mailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
   I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
  
   The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
   if 3.65GHz could handle it.
  
   I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
   linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
 horrible.
  
   But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
  
   I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
   situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
   low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
   NSM365.
  
   Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
  
   I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
   with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
 900MHz.
  
   On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
   How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
   only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
   switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
  
   Thanks
  
   Patrick Nix, Jr.,
   Computer Network Solutions
   CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
   IT Manager
  
   http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
   http://www.csweb.net
  
   (918) 235-0414
  
   
  
   Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
   privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
   notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
   destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
   person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
   --
   Simon Westlake
   si...@powercode.com mailto:si...@powercode.com
   (920) 351-1010
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Faisal Imtiaz

Hi Victoria,
In total seriousness, if one of my installers did something like this, 
even for a temp job, I would fire them..


This person appears to have no clue as to be able to  estimate what load 
/ leverage / mechanical setup at all about.


:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net


On 6/22/2011 11:49 AM, Victoria wrote:

We put up a test site with 3.65 and the recent winds blew it down, plus my
installer really did a temporary job (attached). :(

However, I was able to connect2 miles with a customer radio @ 1 Mbps down/
2 Mbps up.  Totally amazed it would even see the AP!

Talk about non-LOS!

Victoria Proffer
President/CEO
St. Louis Broadband
314.974.5600

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.

The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.

I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible.

But I get about 3Mbps throughput.

I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
NSM365.

Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.

I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz.

On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:

How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.

Thanks

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager

http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net

(918) 235-0414



Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be

illegal.










WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/





WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Victoria
LOL, agreed J, but it was for more of a site survey, to see what these guys
would do and to check the noise level. 

We still have to run conduit, it is a pretty massive roof and we did not
want to take that job on if the UNBT wasn't for us.

 

Victoria Proffer

President/CEO

 http://stlbroadband.com/ St. Louis Broadband

314.974.5600

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:01 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

 

Hi Victoria,
In total seriousness, if one of my installers did something like this, even
for a temp job, I would fire them..

This person appears to have no clue as to be able to  estimate what load /
leverage / mechanical setup at all about.

:)



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net


On 6/22/2011 11:49 AM, Victoria wrote: 

We put up a test site with 3.65 and the recent winds blew it down, plus my
installer really did a temporary job (attached). :(
 
However, I was able to connect 2 miles with a customer radio @ 1 Mbps down/
2 Mbps up.  Totally amazed it would even see the AP!  
 
Talk about non-LOS!
 
Victoria Proffer
President/CEO
St. Louis Broadband
314.974.5600
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
 
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
 
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see 
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
 
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is 
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty horrible.
 
But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
 
I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare 
situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the 
low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight 
NSM365.
 
Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
 
I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK 
with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be 900MHz.
 
On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:

How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
 
Thanks
 
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
 
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
 
(918) 235-0414
 

 
Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be

illegal.

 
 
 
 
 
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 




 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  _  


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3719 - Release Date: 06/22/11




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
You are asking a fair question, but the answer to this question is based 
on a lot of IF's and But's


Frequency of 3.65 should have very similar characteristics of 2.4
UBNT Dual Polarity appears to have a great advantage over single 
polarity when shooting thru Foliage

Going thru Foliage has a different meaning to everyone
Question becomes how much RSSI you have that you can Loose to Foliage 
and still deliver what you need to deliver to the customer.


Contrary to popular belief, we have a few 5Ghz (UBNT M) links going thru 
(one or two trees). but these are very short links,


To give you a direct comparison.. (distance is less than 1/4 mile)

Two CPE's  shooting to the same AP (all Ubnt M with Airmax / 20Mhz 
Channel), radios are on two warehouse one unit apart.. (i.e. (unit  # 1 
and Unit # 3 on the same row).


CPE # 1 going thru Thick leafy Tree ... (NSM Loco M5) power output 
10dbm, signal -77to-79/-70, signal strength -70
CPE # 2clear LOS .. (NSM Loco M5) power output  5dbm, signal -60/-64 
Signal strength -59


needless to say both links are capable of delivering  well over 20megs 
(customer is not buying as much).


The point is .. if you have RSSI to spare, if you can loose 10-15db 
going thru a tree and still get a decent signal then you may be good 
regardless of what frequency you are using...


We have found that Dual Polarity on the Ubnt M radios has a very big 
positive impact on going thru Foliage or even making short  Non-LOS links...


Of course you mileage may vary...


Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom

On 6/22/2011 11:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:


How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps 
only one or two trees?  What kind of throughput?  We are thinking of 
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.


Thanks

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager

http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net

(918) 235-0414



Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this 
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this 
information by a person other than the intended recipient is 
unauthorized and may be illegal.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Jerry Richardson
When deploying 3.65 you'll want to consider that
- There is only 25MHz of spectrum to use, you'll have nowhere to run if you 
have interference
- To get three AP's on a tower you'll probably have to use to use 7MHz channels 
(using the 5.5 beta2 software)
- 7MHz channel will get get ~15Mbps TCP (maybe higher but I doubt it)
- You'll absolutely need the GPS versions

However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a 25MHz 
wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends. That's A LOT 
of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.


- Jerry


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65?  
Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
 

Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue 
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst 
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What was the signal of the first link in 900?

 On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com
 mailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
   I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
  
   The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
   if 3.65GHz could handle it.
  
   I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
   linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
 horrible.
  
   But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
  
   I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
   situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
   low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
   NSM365.
  
   Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
  
   I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
   with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
 900MHz.
  
   On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
   How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
   only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
   switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
  
   Thanks
  
   Patrick Nix, Jr.,
   Computer Network Solutions
   CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
   IT Manager
  
   http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
   http://www.csweb.net
  
   (918) 235-0414
  
   
  
   Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
   privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
   notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
   destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
   person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
   --
   Simon Westlake
   si...@powercode.com mailto:si...@powercode.com
   (920) 351-1010
  
  
  
  
 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Josh Luthman
However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a
25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends.
That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.

What's wrong with 25 watts and 7Mhz channels?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
 wrote:

 When deploying 3.65 you'll want to consider that
 - There is only 25MHz of spectrum to use, you'll have nowhere to run if you
 have interference
 - To get three AP's on a tower you'll probably have to use to use 7MHz
 channels (using the 5.5 beta2 software)
 - 7MHz channel will get get ~15Mbps TCP (maybe higher but I doubt it)
 - You'll absolutely need the GPS versions

 However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a
 25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends.
 That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.


 - Jerry


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
 Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

 In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT
 3.65?  Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common,
 or Private?

 Thanks,

 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414


 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
 the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
 copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
 the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Simon Westlake
 Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

 It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
 though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
 case 3.65GHz scenario.

 On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  What was the signal of the first link in 900?
 
  On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com
  mailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with
 3.65GHz.
   
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to
 see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
   
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It
 is
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
  horrible.
   
But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
   
I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
NSM365.
   
Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
   
I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work
 OK
with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
  900MHz.
   
On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference
 issues.
   
Thanks
   
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
   
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
   
(918) 235-0414
   
   
 
   
Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
 and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail
 and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
  illegal.
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
   
 
 
   
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
   
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
   
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
--
Simon Westlake
si...@powercode.com mailto:si...@powercode.com
(920) 351-1010

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Jerry Richardson
1W/MHz is the rule

7MHz channel = 7W (38.5dB)

Plus you don't get to use the antenna rules for CPE's, max EIRP is fixed 
regardless of antenna used.

- Jerry

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a 25MHz 
wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends. That's A LOT 
of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.

What's wrong with 25 watts and 7Mhz channels?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jerry Richardson 
jrichard...@aircloud.commailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
When deploying 3.65 you'll want to consider that
- There is only 25MHz of spectrum to use, you'll have nowhere to run if you 
have interference
- To get three AP's on a tower you'll probably have to use to use 7MHz channels 
(using the 5.5 beta2 software)
- 7MHz channel will get get ~15Mbps TCP (maybe higher but I doubt it)
- You'll absolutely need the GPS versions

However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a 25MHz 
wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends. That's A LOT 
of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.


- Jerry


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT 3.65?  
Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common, or 
Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NEThttp://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414tel:%28918%29%20235-0414


Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any 
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the 
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What was the signal of the first link in 900?

 On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake 
 si...@powercode.commailto:si...@powercode.com
 mailto:si...@powercode.commailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
   I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
  
   The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
   if 3.65GHz could handle it.
  
   I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
   linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
 horrible.
  
   But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
  
   I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a nightmare
   situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is linked in the
   low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a straight
   NSM365.
  
   Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
  
   I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen it work OK
   with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required to be
 900MHz.
  
   On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
   How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
   only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
   switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
  
   Thanks
  
   Patrick Nix, Jr.,
   Computer Network Solutions
   CSWEB.NEThttp://CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
   IT Manager
  
   http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
   http://www.csweb.net
  
   (918) 235-0414tel:%28918%29%20235-0414
  
   
  
   Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
   privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
   notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
   destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
   person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

2011-06-22 Thread Mike Hammett

1 watt per MHz limit in 3650.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 6/22/2011 11:29 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with 
a 25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE 
ends. That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room 
for growth.


What's wrong with 25 watts and 7Mhz channels?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jerry Richardson 
jrichard...@aircloud.com mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:


When deploying 3.65 you'll want to consider that
- There is only 25MHz of spectrum to use, you'll have nowhere to
run if you have interference
- To get three AP's on a tower you'll probably have to use to use
7MHz channels (using the 5.5 beta2 software)
- 7MHz channel will get get ~15Mbps TCP (maybe higher but I doubt it)
- You'll absolutely need the GPS versions

However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go
with a 25MHz wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP
and CPE ends. That's A LOT of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT
leaves no room for growth.


- Jerry


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with
UBNT 3.65?  Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common
Carrier, Non-Common, or Private?

Thanks,

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net
(918) 235-0414 tel:%28918%29%20235-0414


Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any
dissemination or use of this information by a person other than
the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax

It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
case 3.65GHz scenario.

On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 What was the signal of the first link in 900?

 On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com
mailto:si...@powercode.com
 mailto:si...@powercode.com mailto:si...@powercode.com wrote:
  I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles
with 3.65GHz.
 
  The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a
test to see
  if 3.65GHz could handle it.
 
  I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a
test. It is
  linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85 to -90dB. Pretty
 horrible.
 
  But I get about 3Mbps throughput.
 
  I have another customer with a lot of foliage but not such a
nightmare
  situation. 900MHz was linked at about -75ish, 3.65GHz is
linked in the
  low 80s (-82 to -85ish). This is without a reflector, just a
straight
  NSM365.
 
  Customer gets about 5Mbps x 1.5Mbps.
 
  I don't think it is great at dense penetration but we've seen
it work OK
  with a low noise floor in areas that were previously required
to be
 900MHz.
 
  On 6/22/2011 10:27 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
  How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage
perhaps
  only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are
thinking of
  switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of
interference issues.
 
  Thanks
 
  Patrick Nix, Jr.,
  Computer Network Solutions
  CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET http://CSWEB.NET Internet Services
  IT Manager
 
  http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
  http://www.csweb.net
 
  (918) 235-0414 tel:%28918%29%20235-0414
 
 

 
  Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential and
  privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, please
  notify the sender immediately by return e

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-21 Thread Jeff Booher
Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

I really can't remember about throughput.  This was really what the board
would do, not the card.  We felt it was the max that the board/card/snr
could give which was encouraging as this is on a site that we've had a TON
of 5 GHz noise.  Our specific application had a much lower need than the
test results gave, so that's why I don't remember.  In other words, the
spectrum was clean, and nice for a change.

It was a StarOS WAR4-WP188 board, 64MB with 8 MB flash and 533MHz IXP-425
CPU.

Nice boards.  We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel
is 70mbps aggregate.

- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what we
 would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to 
 the
 3.5GHz antennas.

 Two issues...

 1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with 
 the
 new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they 
 would
 not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.

 2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a
 significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating 
 altogether.
 On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non
 grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad radios,
 then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the 
 center
 frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless radios.

 What kind of throughput are you getting?

 Matt





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-21 Thread Mark Nash
Yes, but my message wasn't clear.  When I said

We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel is 70mbps
aggregate.

I wasn't talking about the 3.65 link


Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:03 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

 I really can't remember about throughput.  This was really what the board
 would do, not the card.  We felt it was the max that the board/card/snr
 could give which was encouraging as this is on a site that we've had a TON
 of 5 GHz noise.  Our specific application had a much lower need than the
 test results gave, so that's why I don't remember.  In other words, the
 spectrum was clean, and nice for a change.

 It was a StarOS WAR4-WP188 board, 64MB with 8 MB flash and 533MHz IXP-425
 CPU.

 Nice boards.  We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz
channel
 is 70mbps aggregate.

 - Original Message -
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


  Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what
we
  would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to
  the
  3.5GHz antennas.
 
  Two issues...
 
  1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out
with
  the
  new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they
  would
  not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.
 
  2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a
  significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating
  altogether.
  On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non
  grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad
radios,
  then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the
  center
  frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless
radios.
 
  What kind of throughput are you getting?
 
  Matt
 
 
 
 --
--
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 --
--
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




 --
--
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
--
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 --
--
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
--

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-21 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods*  It shouldn't perform any differently than any other XR series of 
radio with settings other than frequency the same.

Well, RF-wise it'll be different, but not data wise.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

 Yes, but my message wasn't clear.  When I said

 We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel is 70mbps
 aggregate.

 I wasn't talking about the 3.65 link


 Mark Nash
 UnwiredWest
 78 Centennial Loop
 Suite E
 Eugene, OR 97401
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
 http://www.unwiredwest.com
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:03 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

 I really can't remember about throughput.  This was really what the board
 would do, not the card.  We felt it was the max that the board/card/snr
 could give which was encouraging as this is on a site that we've had a 
 TON
 of 5 GHz noise.  Our specific application had a much lower need than the
 test results gave, so that's why I don't remember.  In other words, the
 spectrum was clean, and nice for a change.

 It was a StarOS WAR4-WP188 board, 64MB with 8 MB flash and 533MHz IXP-425
 CPU.

 Nice boards.  We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz
 channel
 is 70mbps aggregate.

 - Original Message -
 From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


  Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what
 we
  would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due 
  to
  the
  3.5GHz antennas.
 
  Two issues...
 
  1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out
 with
  the
  new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they
  would
  not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.
 
  2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a
  significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating
  altogether.
  On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non
  grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad
 radios,
  then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the
  center
  frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless
 radios.
 
  What kind of throughput are you getting?
 
  Matt
 
 
 
 --
 --
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 --
 --
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




 --
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Matt Hardy
We put together a wiki entry for our customers that explains the entire
process of 3.65GHz licensing, from applying for an FRN number, to
obtaining a nationwide license, to registering each site location. 

Maybe this will help some of you guys too:
http://ligowave.com/wiki/index.php/LigoWave_3.65GHz_Licensing_Process_Walkthrough

Hopefully you can make use of it too.
Let me know if you have any questions or comments!

-Matt



On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 16:34 -0500, Joel White wrote:

 Mark,
 
 Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Message: 24 
 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; 
 reply-type=original 
 
 Although I got my license and site registration some time ago, I am only now 
 putting it up.   Will be done early next week. 
 
 Mark 
 
 
 
 NGA Support Team
 NexGenAccess Inc.
 www.nexgenaccess.com
 740-513-4122
 
 NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Matt
 Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what we
 would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the
 3.5GHz antennas.

 Two issues...

 1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the
 new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they would
 not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.

 2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a
 significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating altogether.
 On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non
 grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad radios,
 then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the center
 frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless radios.

What kind of throughput are you getting?

Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread Mark Nash
I really can't remember about throughput.  This was really what the board 
would do, not the card.  We felt it was the max that the board/card/snr 
could give which was encouraging as this is on a site that we've had a TON 
of 5 GHz noise.  Our specific application had a much lower need than the 
test results gave, so that's why I don't remember.  In other words, the 
spectrum was clean, and nice for a change.

It was a StarOS WAR4-WP188 board, 64MB with 8 MB flash and 533MHz IXP-425 
CPU.

Nice boards.  We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel 
is 70mbps aggregate.

- Original Message - 
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what we
 would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to 
 the
 3.5GHz antennas.

 Two issues...

 1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with 
 the
 new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they 
 would
 not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.

 2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a
 significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating 
 altogether.
 On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non
 grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad radios,
 then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the 
 center
 frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless radios.

 What kind of throughput are you getting?

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-20 Thread reader
Not yet.

The process of getting the license was easy.   The site registration was 
completely new to me and took quite some time.   The FCC has a whole batch 
of terminology you may know nothing about.





insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:34 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Mark,

 Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?

 Thanks,

 Message: 24
 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original

 Although I got my license and site registration some time ago, I am only 
 now
 putting it up.   Will be done early next week.

 Mark



 NGA Support Team
 NexGenAccess Inc.
 www.nexgenaccess.com
 740-513-4122

 NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-19 Thread Mike Hammett
I believe Mark in...  Oregon has done so.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:38 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

 Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
 Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?

 TIA

 Best Regards,

 Joel

 NexGenAccess Inc.
 www.nexgenaccess.com
 740-513-4122

 NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-19 Thread reader
Although I got my license and site registration some time ago, I am only now 
putting it up.   Will be done early next week.

Mark




insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


I believe Mark in...  Oregon has done so.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 --
 From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:38 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

 Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
 Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?

 TIA

 Best Regards,

 Joel

 NexGenAccess Inc.
 www.nexgenaccess.com
 740-513-4122

 NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-18 Thread Charles Wyble
Joel White wrote:
 Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC? 
 Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?

   

I would love to get an answer to this as well.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-18 Thread reader
I'm putting stuff up the first of the week next week.  I'll post results.





insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:38 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
 Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?

 TIA

 Best Regards,

 Joel

 NexGenAccess Inc.
 www.nexgenaccess.com
 740-513-4122

 NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

2008-11-18 Thread Mark Nash
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas.  They got what we 
would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the 
3.5GHz antennas.

Two issues...

1.  We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the 
new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they would 
not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP.

2.  We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a 
significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating altogether. 
On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non 
grounding thet antennas.  But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad radios, 
then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the center 
frequency issue.  At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless radios.
- Original Message - 
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65


 Joel White wrote:
 Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
 Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?



 I would love to get an answer to this as well.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/