Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-17 Thread Marco Coelho
Testing to a dedicated Cogent server in California yielded the best
results; however, even testing to their pool of iperf servers provided
a transfer of 796 Mb/s.  The trick was to run multiple threads (50).

Marco Coelho


[r...@ns1 ~]# iperf  -c dca.iperf.cogentco.com -w 256000 -P 50 -C

Client connecting to dca.iperf.cogentco.com, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:   256 KByte (WARNING: requested   250 KByte)

[ 49] local 64.202.224.2 port 38472 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[  3] local 64.202.224.2 port 3 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 10] local 64.202.224.2 port 38426 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[  5] local 64.202.224.2 port 1 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[  4] local 64.202.224.2 port 5 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[  8] local 64.202.224.2 port 38428 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 11] local 64.202.224.2 port 7 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 16] local 64.202.224.2 port 9 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 18] local 64.202.224.2 port 38432 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[  6] local 64.202.224.2 port 38430 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 12] local 64.202.224.2 port 33341 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 17] local 64.202.224.2 port 38434 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 15] local 64.202.224.2 port 38436 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 14] local 64.202.224.2 port 33343 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 13] local 64.202.224.2 port 33345 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 20] local 64.202.224.2 port 38438 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 24] local 64.202.224.2 port 38439 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 27] local 64.202.224.2 port 33348 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 28] local 64.202.224.2 port 38442 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 23] local 64.202.224.2 port 33351 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 19] local 64.202.224.2 port 33349 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 29] local 64.202.224.2 port 38445 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 33] local 64.202.224.2 port 33352 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 21] local 64.202.224.2 port 33355 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 31] local 64.202.224.2 port 38448 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 44] local 64.202.224.2 port 33357 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 32] local 64.202.224.2 port 38446 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 30] local 64.202.224.2 port 38450 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 46] local 64.202.224.2 port 38451 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 47] local 64.202.224.2 port 33360 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 36] local 64.202.224.2 port 33362 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 51] local 64.202.224.2 port 33363 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 48] local 64.202.224.2 port 38456 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 40] local 64.202.224.2 port 38453 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 37] local 64.202.224.2 port 38458 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 26] local 64.202.224.2 port 33365 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 22] local 64.202.224.2 port 38460 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 43] local 64.202.224.2 port 38461 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 42] local 64.202.224.2 port 33367 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 52] local 64.202.224.2 port 38463 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 25] local 64.202.224.2 port 38464 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 38] local 64.202.224.2 port 33373 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 39] local 64.202.224.2 port 38467 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 50] local 64.202.224.2 port 38462 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 35] local 64.202.224.2 port 33374 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[  9] local 64.202.224.2 port 33378 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 41] local 64.202.224.2 port 33377 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ 45] local 64.202.224.2 port 33379 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[  7] local 64.202.224.2 port 38424 connected with 38.99.216.146 port 5001
[ 34] local 64.202.224.2 port 33375 connected with 38.99.216.150 port 5001
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 19]  0.0-10.0 sec  37.2 MBytes  31.2 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 36]  0.0-10.0 sec  21.1 MBytes  17.7 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 32]  0.0-10.0 sec  43.3 MBytes  36.3 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 30]  0.0-10.0 sec  42.9 MBytes  35.9 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 40]  0.0-10.0 sec  44.1 MBytes  36.9 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 44]  0.0-10.0 sec  17.1 MBytes  14.3 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  29.2 MBytes  24.5 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[ 26]  0.0-10.0 sec  

Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-16 Thread RickG
Good info Rubens. Thanks!

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Rubens Kuhl  wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, RickG  wrote:
>> Thats leads me to a question. I note RB's website specs for the 450G says:
>> Actual tested throughput Ether1 <-> Ether2 = 1Gbps
>
> For large-large-large packets, as these boards are pps limited.
>
>> Ether2 <-> Ether3 = 650Mbps 1Gbps throughput on ports 1-2
>
> That's because Ether 2 to 5 are connected to a single gigabit CPU
> port.  It should read 500 Mbps and not 650 Mbps, as 650 Mbps would
> imply a 1.3Gbps port.
>
>
>> Is the 750 the same?
>
> THe RB750 don't use the RB450G and RB750G switch chip.
> (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Switch_Chip_Features)
>
>> Also, what does "optional Switch Chip functionality for wire speed
>> Gigabit throughput." mean?
>
> It means if you configure switching instead of CPU-forwarding on these
> ports, they will get wire speed throughput. But it will be limited
> layer-2 and may be tag insertion/removal, some L3/L4 ACLs if they are
> small.
>
>> This is interesting as well:
>> "Comparing to RB750, the G version adds not only Gigabit capable ports, but
>> a new 680MHz Atheros 7161 CPU for increased throughput. Up to 580Mbps
>> throughout with larger packets, and up to 91500pps with small packets!"
>
> According to the page above RB750G doesn't have the "all-port-switch"
> option of RB450G, which suggests it only has one gigabit connection to
> the CPU. The fact that all RB750G ports have the same MTU
> (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Maximum_Transmission_Unit_on_RouterBoards),
> when RB450G Ether1 has a slightly larger MTU than RB450G Ether2-5
> suggests that as well.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-16 Thread Tom DeReggi
Want to remind on the Latency factor versus window size that will limit the 
maximum speed possible to transfer per TCP session.
To test 1G, you really need to have a near by low latency site to test to, 
to get accurate result for a single session.
And may be impossible to fill capacity without multiple sessions.
You'll probably have to use UDP to test for capacity. Testing TCP quality 
will be a bit tougher.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Marco Coelho" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:53 PM
Subject: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open


> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
> see if it's up to snuff.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marco
>
> -- 
> Marco C. Coelho
> Argon Technologies Inc.
> POB 875
> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
> 903-455-5036
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-16 Thread Philip Dorr
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Jon Auer  wrote:
> So, I have a friend that tried that once.
>
> It can be pretty hard to get decent speed with bittorrent on a stock system.
> Lots of different clients, all requesting different data. Plays havoc
> on drives. Need plenty of cache. RAID0 disk array, etc.
>
A RAM Disk should work.  Rather easy to setup in Linux to test with.

> On top of that the linux distributions didn't seem to have that much
> demand, relatively speaking (FTP mirror sites across peering seem to
> perform better for me).
> To actually get enough demand to drive the throughput we wanted we had
> to resort to unmentionable yet far more popular content.
>
Get a Linux Distro, like Ubuntu, on release day.

> But yes, quite fun to take something common and tune it to perform at
> uncommon loads.
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Josh Luthman
>  wrote:
>> Torrents will fill capacity much better.  Centos, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora,
>> etc.  Share the wealth!
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
>> that counts.”
>> --- Winston Churchill
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Marco Coelho  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
>>> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
>>> see if it's up to snuff.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marco C. Coelho
>>> Argon Technologies Inc.
>>> POB 875
>>> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
>>> 903-455-5036
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-16 Thread Jon Auer
So, I have a friend that tried that once.

It can be pretty hard to get decent speed with bittorrent on a stock system.
Lots of different clients, all requesting different data. Plays havoc
on drives. Need plenty of cache. RAID0 disk array, etc.

On top of that the linux distributions didn't seem to have that much
demand, relatively speaking (FTP mirror sites across peering seem to
perform better for me).
To actually get enough demand to drive the throughput we wanted we had
to resort to unmentionable yet far more popular content.

But yes, quite fun to take something common and tune it to perform at
uncommon loads.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Josh Luthman
 wrote:
> Torrents will fill capacity much better.  Centos, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora,
> etc.  Share the wealth!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
> that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Marco Coelho  wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
>> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
>> see if it's up to snuff.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> --
>> Marco C. Coelho
>> Argon Technologies Inc.
>> POB 875
>> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
>> 903-455-5036
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-15 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, RickG  wrote:
> Thats leads me to a question. I note RB's website specs for the 450G says:
> Actual tested throughput Ether1 <-> Ether2 = 1Gbps

For large-large-large packets, as these boards are pps limited.

> Ether2 <-> Ether3 = 650Mbps 1Gbps throughput on ports 1-2

That's because Ether 2 to 5 are connected to a single gigabit CPU
port.  It should read 500 Mbps and not 650 Mbps, as 650 Mbps would
imply a 1.3Gbps port.


> Is the 750 the same?

THe RB750 don't use the RB450G and RB750G switch chip.
(http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Switch_Chip_Features)

> Also, what does "optional Switch Chip functionality for wire speed
> Gigabit throughput." mean?

It means if you configure switching instead of CPU-forwarding on these
ports, they will get wire speed throughput. But it will be limited
layer-2 and may be tag insertion/removal, some L3/L4 ACLs if they are
small.

> This is interesting as well:
> "Comparing to RB750, the G version adds not only Gigabit capable ports, but
> a new 680MHz Atheros 7161 CPU for increased throughput. Up to 580Mbps
> throughout with larger packets, and up to 91500pps with small packets!"

According to the page above RB750G doesn't have the "all-port-switch"
option of RB450G, which suggests it only has one gigabit connection to
the CPU. The fact that all RB750G ports have the same MTU
(http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Maximum_Transmission_Unit_on_RouterBoards),
when RB450G Ether1 has a slightly larger MTU than RB450G Ether2-5
suggests that as well.


Rubens



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-15 Thread RickG
Thats leads me to a question. I note RB's website specs for the 450G says:
Actual tested throughput Ether1 <-> Ether2 = 1Gbps
Ether2 <-> Ether3 = 650Mbps 1Gbps throughput on ports 1-2

Is the 750 the same?
Also, what does "optional Switch Chip functionality for wire speed
Gigabit throughput." mean?
This is interesting as well:
"Comparing to RB750, the G version adds not only Gigabit capable ports, but
a new 680MHz Atheros 7161 CPU for increased throughput. Up to 580Mbps
throughout with larger packets, and up to 91500pps with small packets!"

-RickG

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dylan Bouterse  wrote:
> Two 750Gs back to back with a cat 5 only got 300-400Mb in a test we just
> did recently. I'm interested to see if you are able to get something
> better.
>
> Dylan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Marco Coelho
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:53 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open
>
> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
> see if it's up to snuff.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marco
>
> --
> Marco C. Coelho
> Argon Technologies Inc.
> POB 875
> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
> 903-455-5036
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-15 Thread Marco Coelho
I just pulled 780 between Texas and California

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Dylan Bouterse  wrote:
> Two 750Gs back to back with a cat 5 only got 300-400Mb in a test we just
> did recently. I'm interested to see if you are able to get something
> better.
>
> Dylan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Marco Coelho
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:53 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open
>
> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
> see if it's up to snuff.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marco
>
> --
> Marco C. Coelho
> Argon Technologies Inc.
> POB 875
> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
> 903-455-5036
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-15 Thread Dylan Bouterse
Two 750Gs back to back with a cat 5 only got 300-400Mb in a test we just
did recently. I'm interested to see if you are able to get something
better.

Dylan

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
see if it's up to snuff.

Thanks in advance.

Marco

-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] looking for iperf test site with 1G open

2010-04-15 Thread Josh Luthman
Torrents will fill capacity much better.  Centos, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora,
etc.  Share the wealth!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Marco Coelho  wrote:

> I'm looking for someone with at least 1Gb/s of unused bandwidth to do
> a few iperf tests against.  I just lit up some new fiber and want to
> see if it's up to snuff.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marco
>
> --
> Marco C. Coelho
> Argon Technologies Inc.
> POB 875
> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
> 903-455-5036
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/