Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-13 Thread John Scrivner
Broadband - Original Message - From: Mario Pommier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment Tom, $40K is a lot, true. But here's what I've heard from fiber providers in my

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-12 Thread Tom DeReggi
: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment Licensed 70 to 80 GHz actually has less oxygen absorption of the signal than 60 GHz (by several orders of magnitude). If you are providing a Service Level Agreement with 5 - 9's or better % uptime then you should stick with a licensed product IMO. As Matt

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-07 Thread Ron Wallace
To All, This is another excellent comment from our President, thanks John. We can all use this information.Ron Wallace Hahnron, Inc. 220 S. Jackson Dt. Addison, MI 49220 Phone: (517)547-8410 Mobile: (517)605-4542 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: John

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-05 Thread Cliff Leboeuf
Title: Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment Mario, I too have a similar opportunity. Mine is for about 1,500 feet. However, the prices that I have received are considerably less than what you have below. - Cliff On 9/5/06 4:37 PM, Mario Pommier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a new area

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-05 Thread Mario Pommier
Good to hear that. Priced similarly? Thanks. Mario Matt Liotta wrote: We deploy BrideWave gear and have been happy with it. BridgeWave also has a licensed radio operating in the 80Ghz range. -Matt Mario Pommier wrote: This is a new area of wireless deployment for me: I've been asked to

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-05 Thread lakeland
configure it and test it. :-) Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Cliff Leboeuf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:42:45 To:WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment Mario, I too have a similar

Re: [WISPA] wireless fiber deployment

2006-09-05 Thread John Scrivner
Licensed 70 to 80 GHz actually has less oxygen absorption of the signal than 60 GHz (by several orders of magnitude). If you are providing a Service Level Agreement with 5 - 9's or better % uptime then you should stick with a licensed product IMO. As Matt states below, both companies offer a