[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13748] New: Wireshark needs a way to specify arbitrary strings as capture devices

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13748 Bug ID: 13748 Summary: Wireshark needs a way to specify arbitrary strings as capture devices Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13747] New: [oss-fuzz] UBSAN: division by zero in packet-thread.c:1824:82

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13747 Bug ID: 13747 Summary: [oss-fuzz] UBSAN: division by zero in packet-thread.c:1824:82 Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86-64 URL:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13747] [oss-fuzz] UBSAN: division by zero in packet-thread.c:1824:82

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13747 --- Comment #1 from Peter Wu --- Created attachment 15588 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15588=edit Packet capture file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13732] Invalid certificate for https://wireshark.org

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 Gerald Combs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13746] Dissectors using Decode As need to account for tunneling

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13746 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13746] New: Dissectors using Decode As need to account for tunneling

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13746 Bug ID: 13746 Summary: Dissectors using Decode As need to account for tunneling Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: All OS: All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13662] [oss-fuzz] ASAN: stack-use-after-return epan/dissectors/packet-ieee80211.c:14341:23 in add_tagged_field

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662 --- Comment #10 from Gerald Combs --- This doesn't appear to be exploitable or cause a denial of service, so I'm assuming it doesn't warrant a CVE ID. If that's not the case please let me know. -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13599] libfuzzer: BZR dissector loop (get_bzr_pdu_len)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13599 Gerald Combs changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15449|1 |0

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13588] LibFuzzer: ISUP dissector bug (isup.number_different_meaning)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13588 Gerald Combs changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|libfuzzer: isup dissector |LibFuzzer:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13745] RADIUS: Vendor-Specific Extended Attributes (RFC 6929) are not correctly decoded

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13745 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Status|INCOMPLETE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13745] RADIUS: Vendor-Specific Extended Attributes (RFC 6929) are not correctly decoded

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13745 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13744] Assert/Crash in Manage Interfaces dialog (debug only)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13744 --- Comment #2 from Michael Mann --- (In reply to Roland Knall from comment #1) > Could you add a textfile with the asserts please? I do not have access to > VS2013 (only 2015 and higher) and will take a look at it.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13745] New: RADIUS: Vendor-Specific Extended Attributes (RFC 6929) are not correctly decoded

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13745 Bug ID: 13745 Summary: RADIUS: Vendor-Specific Extended Attributes (RFC 6929) are not correctly decoded Product: Wireshark Version: 2.3.x (Experimental) Hardware:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13743] SSL decryption does not work as documented for nonstandard SSL port

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 --- Comment #2 from Peter Wu --- Can you clarify the report? It is not clear whether the TCP payload is not recognized as SSL or whether the SSL decryption fails for some other reason. Something like this: -

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13743] SSL decryption does not work as documented for nonstandard SSL port

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13744] Assert/Crash in Manage Interfaces dialog (debug only)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13744 --- Comment #1 from Roland Knall --- Could you add a textfile with the asserts please? I do not have access to VS2013 (only 2015 and higher) and will take a look at it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13744] Assert/Crash in Manage Interfaces dialog (debug only)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13744 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13744] New: Assert/Crash in Manage Interfaces dialog (debug only)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13744 Bug ID: 13744 Summary: Assert/Crash in Manage Interfaces dialog (debug only) Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows 7 Status:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11668] extcap: capture filter should be validated by the extcap

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11668 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13743] SSL decryption does not work as documented for nonstandard SSL port

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 --- Comment #1 from AN --- Wireshark 2.2.6 (v2.2.6-0-g32dac6a) Copyright 1998-2017 Gerald Combs and contributors. License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13743] New: SSL decryption does not work as documented for nonstandard SSL port

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 Bug ID: 13743 Summary: SSL decryption does not work as documented for nonstandard SSL port Product: Wireshark Version: 2.2.6 Hardware: x86 OS:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13653] extcap: Several issues when capturing from multiple extcap interfaces

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13653 --- Comment #1 from Pascal Quantin --- *** Bug 13742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|INCOMPLETE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13653] extcap: Several issues when capturing from multiple extcap interfaces

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13653 Ganesan changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 --- Comment #6 from Ganesan --- (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #5) > If you are using USBPcap extcap interfaces, you are probably facing bug > 13653. For now on Windows you can only capture with a single

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 Ganesan changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 --- Comment #3 from Ganesan --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2) > (In reply to Ganesan from comment #0) > > Capturing on 2 interfaces > > tshark: Unrecognized libpcap format or not libpcap data. > > That's

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13742] Wireshark format error when capturing on multiple USB interfaces on the same machine

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13742 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1