[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14403] Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14403 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25703 merged by Guy Harris: Do the maximum block size check in pcap_read_block(). https://code.wireshark.org/review/25703 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14403] Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14403 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25703 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Do the maximum block size check in pcap_read_block(). https://code.wireshark.org/review/25703 --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14403] Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14403 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25702 merged by Guy Harris: Do the maximum block size check in pcap_read_block(). https://code.wireshark.org/review/25702 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14403] Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14403 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25702 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Do the maximum block size check in pcap_read_block(). https://code.wireshark.org/review/25702 --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14404] New: Feature Request: pcap over netcat

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14404 Bug ID: 14404 Summary: Feature Request: pcap over netcat Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14367] Extend ieee802154 CCM API to accept a generic nonce

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14367 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13881] Add (IETF) QUIC Dissector

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #60 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25687 merged by Anders Broman: QUIC: Add initial draft-09 support https://code.wireshark.org/review/25687 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13881] Add (IETF) QUIC Dissector

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #59 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25686 merged by Anders Broman: QUIC: remove draft-07 support https://code.wireshark.org/review/25686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13881] Add (IETF) QUIC Dissector

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #58 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25689 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte: QUIC: Add new label of draft-09 https://code.wireshark.org/review/25689 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13881] Add (IETF) QUIC Dissector

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #57 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25687 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte: QUIC: Add initial draft-09 support https://code.wireshark.org/review/25687 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13881] Add (IETF) QUIC Dissector

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 --- Comment #56 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 25686 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte: QUIC: remove draft-07 support https://code.wireshark.org/review/25686 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14403] New: Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c

2018-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14403 Bug ID: 14403 Summary: Missing bounds check on memory allocation in pcapng.c Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED