https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #13 from TheDiveO ---
Thank you for clarifying!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15709
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33157 merged by Anders Broman:
Qt: do not expose a UAT record if the update callback fails
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33157
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15777
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33196 merged by Anders Broman:
mmdbresolve: Improve our main loop check.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33196
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33203 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
TLS: fix DISSECTOR_ASSERT for zero-length records fragments
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33203
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33198 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Don't pretend we can handle multiple-section pcapng files when we can't.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33198
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15779
Tomasz Mon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Extras |Qt UI
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15779
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Mon ---
"foo --extcap-config --extcap-interface foobar" is called twice also when you
double click on interface that does not have valid configuration saved in
preferences (and thus the configuration dialog
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15779
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Mon ---
The first time "foo --extcap-config --extcap-interface foobar" is called from
InterfaceFrame::on_interfaceTree_clicked() inside the
extcap_has_configuration().
The second time "foo --extcap-config
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #11 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to TheDiveO from comment #8)
> Do I correctly understand your analysis in that when using extcap/piping,
> the machine capturing packets and the Wireshark machine needs to be both of
> the
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #10 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Tomasz Mon from comment #4)
> Could you please provide some mixed-endian pcapng file that contains some
> actual data packets?
...because that probably won't work. The current code does
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15779
Tomasz Mon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deso...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #9 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to TheDiveO from comment #0)
> - le-shb.pcapng: contains a single SHB in LE, with interface block also in
> BE.
Presumably meaning "also in LE", as running Wireshark in "Fileshark mode"
(start
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17066|contains a single SHB in|contains a single SHB in
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15775
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #3)
>
> *Most* of the sample boxes can be clicked to get a color dialog with a
> recent build, from the master branch, on macOS; however, the boxes for
> "Sample
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15775
--- Comment #5 from Richard Berke ---
Created attachment 17124
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17124=edit
Wireshark 3.0.1 QT color picker dialogue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15777
--- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33196 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs:
mmdbresolve: Improve our main loop check.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33196
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15775
--- Comment #4 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Richard Berke from comment #0)
> My 'spur' to try adjusting the colors was that the 'active selected item'
> row doesn't appear with the white text on medium-dark blue background as the
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15775
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 |All
Summary|Appearance >
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15759
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33099 merged by Dario Lombardo:
elastic: make fields all the same.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33099
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
--- Comment #2 from Slava ---
Created attachment 17123
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17123=edit
pcap with different zlib compression levels
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15775
--- Comment #2 from Richard Berke ---
Created attachment 17122
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17122=edit
Wireshark 2.6.5 color picker displayed
Version 2.6.5 (v2.6.5-0-gf766965a)
Color picker displays
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15781
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15731
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15731
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33042 merged by Alexis La Goutte:
docsis: fix for encrypted DOCSIS PDU packets do not match the filter 'eth.dst'
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33042
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15781
--- Comment #1 from Dario Lombardo ---
This is actually happening when writing pcapng files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15782
Bug ID: 15782
Summary: LaunchDaemon runs an unsigned executable
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.0.1
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X 10.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
--- Comment #1 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Hi Felix,
it is possible to attach all this TCP session ? because i don't get error when
open the pcap (and force to use SSL/TLS dissector)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com,
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15781
Bug ID: 15781
Summary: editcap writes wrong version of self
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
Tomasz Mon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deso...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
Bug ID: 15780
Summary: Dissector bug, protocol TLS - failed assertion "data"
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.0.1
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Windows 7
Status:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
Felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wiresh...@fschreiner.de
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 33186 merged by Pascal Quantin:
PROFINET DCP: fix dissection of an empty DHCP option
https://code.wireshark.org/review/33186
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15779
Bug ID: 15779
Summary: --ext-config --extcap-interface called twice when
opening extcap configuration dialog
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.0.1
Hardware: x86
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15778
Bug ID: 15778
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-05-11-20211.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Ubuntu
Status:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15707
--- Comment #8 from TheDiveO ---
Do I correctly understand your analysis in that when using extcap/piping, the
machine capturing packets and the Wireshark machine needs to be both of the
same endianess? Is this correct?
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
Uli Heilmeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15773
--- Comment #6 from Uli Heilmeier ---
I guess we should wait for an updated draft version.
draft-lihawi-ancp-protocol-access-extension uses codes for ANCP TLV Types which
are already assigned by IANA
40 matches
Mail list logo