[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36798 merged by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36798 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36798 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36798 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36796 merged by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36796 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36797 merged by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36797 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36797 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36797 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36795 merged by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36795 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36796 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36796 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36795 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Fix the heuristic for checking whether it's a CAM Inspector file. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36795 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36794 merged by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36794 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36794 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36794 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36793 merged by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36793 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36792 merged by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36792 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36793 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36793 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36791 merged by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36791 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36792 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36792 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Linux |All Hardware|x86

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #3 from Guy Harris --- while (wtap_read_bytes(fh, block, sizeof(block), , _info)) { if (err == WTAP_ERR_SHORT_READ) break; ... } is bogus; it's while (success) { if (the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17694|This pcap file was |This CAM Inspector file was

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Linux |All Hardware|x86

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36791 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: lanalyzer: Make sure a LANalyzer file has exactly one summary record. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36791 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17695|This pcap file was |This LANalyzer file was

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16459] Read of uninitialized memory in lanalyzer_read_trace_record

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16459 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36790 had a related patch set uploaded by Dario Lombardo: lanalyzer: init memory to 0 in allocation. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36790 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16458] Read of uninitialized memory in detect_camins_file

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16489] capture -> options -> select interface -> (choose) -> SEGV

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36789 had a related patch set uploaded by Dario Lombardo: Qt: don't use a widget if not set. https://code.wireshark.org/review/36789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16489] capture -> options -> select interface -> (choose) -> SEGV

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489 Dario Lombardo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lom...@gmail.com --- Comment #6

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16491] Packet List Pane doesn't consume the entire pane.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Maynard --- Indeed, the problem is still there. I must have resized the window not realizing it and when I didn't see the problem anymore, I just figured it was something stupid that I did while fatigued

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16063] Deleting a column produces a crash

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16063 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16491] Packet List Pane doesn't consume the entire pane.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl See

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16491] Packet List Pane doesn't consume the entire pane.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 Stig Bjørlykke changed: What|Removed |Added Version|Git |3.2.3 Hardware|x86-64

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16491] Packet List Pane doesn't consume the entire pane.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 Stig Bjørlykke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@bjorlykke.org

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16491] Packet List Pane doesn't consume the entire pane.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 Christopher Maynard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16468] f5ethtrailer can't find trailer when short frame contains padding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16468 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16481] Ethernet dissector padding identification is too greedy by default

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 --- Comment #3 from Peter Wu --- *** Bug 16468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16488] Decode and filter SIP Display Information uniquely for "To", "From", "Contact" and "PSID" headers

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36773 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: SIP: Differentiate the Display Info items https://code.wireshark.org/review/36773 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16488] Decode and filter SIP Display Information uniquely for "To", "From", "Contact" and "PSID" headers

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16492] Npcap Vn 0.998(7?) causes NIC General Failure

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16492 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16492] New: Npcap Vn 0.998(7?) causes NIC General Failure

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16492 Bug ID: 16492 Summary: Npcap Vn 0.998(7?) causes NIC General Failure Product: Wireshark Version: 3.2.3 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows 7 Status: UNCONFIRMED