[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with TRANSUM dissector enabled

2017-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 Gerald Combs changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|File loading is very slow |File loading

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #12 from Paul Offord --- I did. With the change in place, I performed a quick check with PerfView. With the 1M packet test file, TRANSUM now consumes the same amount of CPU as the TCP Sequence

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24095 merged by Michael Mann: TRANSUM: File loading slow with transum enabled https://code.wireshark.org/review/24095 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24090 merged by Michael Mann: TRANSUM: File loading slow with transum enabled https://code.wireshark.org/review/24090 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24095 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: TRANSUM: File loading slow with transum enabled https://code.wireshark.org/review/24095 -- You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #7 from Paul Offord --- Patch set uploaded - Change 24090 Although the change improves performance I still can't explain why there is a performance difference between the TribeLab plugin and the WS

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #6 from Paul Offord --- I've managed to improve the performance of TRANSUM with a couple of minor changes to the dissector code. Using a 1M packet test file I've reduced load time from 159 seconds

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #5 from Paul Offord --- I think the concern is that, using the same pcapng file, there is a big difference in the load time between Wireshark 2.2 with the old TribeLab transum.dll and Wireshark 2.4.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #3 from Paul Offord --- I think we may need to be a bit more debugging first before we change the code. I originally just had an indexed array for the rrpd_list in the transum dissector for WS 2.2.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

2017-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #1 from Marc Thach Xuan Ky --- Created attachment 15865 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15865=edit Perfview sample call tree Test file too big to attach -- You are receiving