[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #20 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26253 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Add support for new peekremote features. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26253 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #18 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26252 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Add support for new peekremote features. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26252 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #21 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26253 merged by Guy Harris: Add support for new peekremote features. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26253 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #19 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26252 merged by Guy Harris: Add support for new peekremote features. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26252 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #17 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26178 merged by Guy Harris: Add support for new peekremote features. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26178 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #15 from Alexis La Goutte --- (In reply to Nicolas Darchis from comment #14) > I was told git this git push is fine as well instead of git review. > Git is totally new to me so i apologize for any

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Darchis --- I was told git this git push is fine as well instead of git review. Git is totally new to me so i apologize for any mistake and trying to do what I'm told :-)) I also forgot the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #12 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Nicolas Darchis from comment #11) > I modified the commit msg as per the review with a "git commit -amend". > Should i push again or is it auto updated ? Presumably by

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Darchis --- I modified the commit msg as per the review with a "git commit -amend". Should i push again or is it auto updated ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #10 from Jaap Keuter --- (In reply to Nicolas Darchis from comment #9) > git commit --author="Nicolas Darchis" > [bug14452 0437444194] Enhanced peekremote dissector to support

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Darchis --- git commit --author="Nicolas Darchis" [bug14452 0437444194] Enhanced peekremote dissector to support enhanced flag bits for 80mhz channel width, short

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Darchis --- Created attachment 16160 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16160=edit Sniffer trace showing data packets sent with 3 spatial streams. Attaching a

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #7 from Alexis La Goutte --- (In reply to Nicolas Darchis from comment #6) > Thanks Alexis, that worked out great ! > > Can I push the codefix for review ? Yes and also attach a pcap (and not a

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Darchis --- Thanks Alexis, that worked out great ! Can I push the codefix for review ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Darchis --- Created attachment 16155 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16155=edit final screenshot of the fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86 |All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Darchis --- As per above screenshot, I have a candidate fix working great for the 80mhz and short preamble. However for the sptial stream, I would need to do a "+1" on the description of the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14452] PEEKREMOTE dissector lacks 80mhz support, short preamble support and spatial streams encoding

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14452 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Darchis --- Created attachment 16153 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16153=edit screenshot of candidate fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are