https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #10 from Neal Probert ---
IEEE 1609.2 was just updated mid last year (2019). Some minor additions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #9 from Neal Probert ---
(In reply to Anders Broman from comment #8)
> WSA Layer the first octets are 03 8x and the first 4 bits should be version
> according to the ASN1, assuming it's actually 8 bits (0x03) I tried that too
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #8 from Anders Broman ---
WSA Layer the first octets are 03 8x and the first 4 bits should be version
according to the ASN1, assuming it's actually 8 bits (0x03) I tried that too
but the decoding breaks down llater on any way.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #7 from Neal Probert ---
(In reply to Anders Broman from comment #6)
> (In reply to Neal Probert from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 16880 [details]
> > Sample PCAP with WSA for testing
> >
> > Hope this helps as this is
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #6 from Anders Broman ---
(In reply to Neal Probert from comment #5)
> Created attachment 16880 [details]
> Sample PCAP with WSA for testing
>
> Hope this helps as this is sent by the RSU with a WSA.
It looks like the
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #5 from Neal Probert ---
Created attachment 16880
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16880=edit
Sample PCAP with WSA for testing
Hope this helps as this is sent by the RSU with a WSA.
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #4 from Neal Probert ---
The IEEE expert that I talked to said that the PSID in the WSMP layer will call
for a WSA, which is the 1609.3 WSA.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #3 from Neal Probert ---
Give me a couple of days to check as I'm traveling. I've been talking with one
of the guys who is in on the 802.11p and 1609 stuff.
I assume the WSMP and Dot2 layers are still there and continue to
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #2 from Anders Broman ---
I have replaced the WAVE dissector with a new one generated from the ASN1
files. Does this one do the job?
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/31798/
Regards
Anders
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
--- Comment #1 from Anders Broman ---
A trace file would be helpful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15453
Neal Probert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Dissector for 1609.3 Wave |Dissector for IEEE 1609.3
11 matches
Mail list logo
