[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5672|review_for_checkin?

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Fisher st...@stephen-fisher.com 2010-12-27 10:09:41 MST --- I can reproduce this error on Windows, but not FreeBSD, both on r35273. Wireshark on FreeBSD stops after 4 packets and says:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 --- Comment #2 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-27 11:01:15 PST --- Confirmed on Windows XP w/rev 35273. packet-dtn's evaluate_sdnv() is returning a value of 2,120,013 at line 433 of packet-ltp.c within

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 --- Comment #3 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-27 11:17:16 PST --- BTW, I quickly changed: #define EMEM_PACKET_CHUNK_SIZE (10 * 1024 * 1024) to: #define EMEM_PACKET_CHUNK_SIZE (80 * 1024 * 1024) just to

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 --- Comment #4 from Stephen Fisher st...@stephen-fisher.com 2010-12-27 13:32:34 MST --- (In reply to comment #3) In fact, I wonder if any change is really warranted here at all. Thanks for looking into that, Chris. If we can get

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5670|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 --- Comment #6 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-27 13:46:56 PST --- Created an attachment (id=5671) -- (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5671) Screen shot showing the new expert info error for

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5670|application/octet-stream

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5670|review_for_checkin?

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5521] Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2010-12-25-25231.pcap

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5670|0 |1