https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
Bug ID: 12853
Summary: File does not exist
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.0
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Major
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12854
Bug ID: 12854
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-14931.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12855
--- Comment #1 from nobletr...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 14895
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14895=edit
screenshot of bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11755
Thomas W. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #17 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Roland Knall from comment #13)
> The number of interfaces should not be an issue, androiddump generates a lot
> more.
As one of the guys at ask.wireshark.org
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12793
--- Comment #20 from Peter Wu ---
(In reply to Andre Luyer from comment #18)
> Maybe there is another way: in case of a resumed session both ServerHello
> and ChangeCipherSpec will be in the same frame (so that frame
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #18 from Roland Knall ---
(In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #17)
> (In reply to Roland Knall from comment #13)
> > The number of interfaces should not be an issue, androiddump generates a lot
> > more.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #19 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Roland Knall from comment #18)
> (In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Roland Knall from comment #13)
> > > The number of interfaces
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #20 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #17)
> (In reply to Roland Knall from comment #13)
> > The number of interfaces should not be an issue, androiddump generates a lot
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12855
Bug ID: 12855
Summary: Follow TCP Stream shows duplicate stream data
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.3.x (Experimental)
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X 10.11
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12856
Bug ID: 12856
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-31157.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12857
Bug ID: 12857
Summary: Wireshark becomes unresponsive while capturing
packets.
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.0
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12859
Bug ID: 12859
Summary: Display data rate fields for VHT rates invalid with
BCC modulation
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12558
Ashish Shukla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||12859
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12826
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12858
Bug ID: 12858
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-12063.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12826
--- Comment #11 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #8)
> Comment 5 uses an approach that seems quite common for Lua dissectors (I
> think it is also documented in an example Lua dissector): obtain
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12860
Bug ID: 12860
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-24105.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #8 from Roland Knall ---
Just a thought. If USPPcap hangs the first time, it seems that it is trying to
gather information on some socket, and therefore cannot finish the extcap
detection process properly. It
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Graham Bloice changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12846
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Sindelka ---
> Simply click on the wheel icon, which is on the left of the USBPcap
> interface name
Grrr... I was clicking the text all the time :-)
> Not exactly: it's not a check box,
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12846
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #4)
> > Simply click on the wheel icon, which is on the left of the USBPcap
> > interface name
> Grrr... I was clicking the text all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12846
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #6 from Graham Bloice ---
If there are pdb files available for USBPCapCMD, then a dump of the process can
be examined to determine where it's stuck.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #7 from Pascal Quantin ---
I do not have the .pdb file: the program was built by Gerald.
One way to discriminate whether Wiresahrk or USBPcap is the culprit is to
deinstall the -5 version and
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #2)
> Is it solely happening with USBPcapCMD.exe, or does your extcaptest.exe
> alone program also trigger the issue?
It is
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12851
Bug ID: 12851
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2016-09-09-25074.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12850
Bug ID: 12850
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-7566.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12837
--- Comment #6 from Guy Harris ---
The dialog box shown in
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn742498(v=vs.85).aspx
shows "All Picture Files" without any list of extensions, so it appears
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12763
--- Comment #7 from Gerald Combs ---
Can you try
tshark ... | iconv -f UTF-8 -t ASCII//TRANSLIT | less
It's a bit clunky but it translates arrows and middle dots to their ASCII
equivalents here.
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Sindelka ---
> So, short question, if you have a hanging usbpcap and start wireshark a
> second time, can you actually capture on the shown usb devices? If so, the
> main issue is within
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #10 from Roland Knall ---
(In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #9)
> Repeating the question I've asked Pascal - will it move you further if I use
> the Process Monitor and tell you what the command line
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12837
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 17605 had a related patch set uploaded by Dario Lombardo:
Qt: shorten the list for file selection.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/17605
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Roland Knall from comment #10)
> (In reply to Pavel Sindelka from comment #9)
> > Repeating the question I've asked Pascal - will it move you further if I use
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #16 from Michal Labedzki ---
Roland, I check text coding (add Polish letter like "ąąą", "łłł") in various
places like: interface display name, interface name, preference display name
(it saves
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
--- Comment #3 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 12844 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12844
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12826
--- Comment #10 from Peter Wu ---
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #9)
> (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #8)
> > Maybe we should drop this data parameter and use p_add_proto_data:
>
> I would rather rewrite
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
--- Comment #6 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 12852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12852
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|File does not exist |"File does not
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris ---
That's an appropriate file name when capturing from the standard input; perhaps
there's a race condition where the "here's the capture file" message arrives in
Wireshark before the
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Roland Knall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #14 from Michal Labedzki ---
I can reproduce something else but it may be root cause. I have a crash when
new refresh interface list (sometimes Wireshark hangs).
Does usbpcap or your extcap has
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Sindelka ---
(In reply to Michal Labedzki from comment #14)
> Does usbpcap or your extcap has dynamic interfaces like androiddump?
> (interface that can show and gone all the time)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
--- Comment #12 from Pavel Sindelka ---
Created attachment 14892
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14892=edit
Process Monitor log illustrating the issue
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12852
Bug ID: 12852
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-09-30969.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
--- Comment #2 from Peter Wu ---
oops, picked the wrong file. Corrected output:
randpkt-2016-09-08-27704.pcap
Stats: 101M malloced (30M for red zones) by 1156816 calls
Stats: 9M realloced by 15816 calls
Stats: 98M
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
--- Comment #4 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 12848 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12849
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12826
--- Comment #9 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #8)
> Maybe we should drop this data parameter and use p_add_proto_data:
I would rather rewrite the dissector function signature (to have "data
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
Bug ID: 12861
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-10-29402.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11850
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12700
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12751
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12750
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12752
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12848
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12850
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
--- Comment #5 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 12850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12862
Bug ID: 12862
Summary: Buildbot crash output: randpkt-2016-09-10-1188.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
64 matches
Mail list logo