[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] New: GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 Summary: GIT : malformed packet Product: Wireshark Version: SVN Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Low Component:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 --- Comment #1 from Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de 2010-12-22 02:17:15 PST --- Created an attachment (id=5654) -- (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5654) GIT packet stream -- Configure bugmail:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5655|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4300] DTN: Bundle Protocol Control flag length check is incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4300 --- Comment #7 from Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl 2010-12-22 12:51:28 CET --- (In reply to comment #6) sdnv_length is a variable field so it is fine to check if sdnv_length 1, but sdnv_length 1 || sdnv_length 4 is not correct

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 Stig Bjørlykke s...@bjorlykke.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5514] GIT : malformed packet

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5514 Stig Bjørlykke s...@bjorlykke.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5655|review_for_checkin?

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4300] DTN: Bundle Protocol Control flag length check is incorrect

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4300 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5500] failed assertion in ISAKMP dissector (proto.c:4002)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5500 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5656|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5515] New: The MAC of a switch which appears in captures doesn't match with the real one.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5515 Summary: The MAC of a switch which appears in captures doesn't match with the real one. Product: Wireshark Version: 1.4.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4338] mp2t: Implementing PCR clock measurements and analysis

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4338 --- Comment #4 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-22 07:49:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) You can't really depend on that, we might go multithreaded (gasp). I think the only proper way is using a tap. Is that

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5500] failed assertion in ISAKMP dissector (proto.c:4002)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5500 --- Comment #3 from Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl 2010-12-22 17:46:09 CET --- (In reply to comment #2) Created an attachment (id=5656) -- (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5656) [details] Patch to fix a typo

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4338] mp2t: Implementing PCR clock measurements and analysis

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4338 --- Comment #5 from Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl 2010-12-22 17:47:55 CET --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) You can't really depend on that, we might go multithreaded (gasp). I think the only proper way is

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5279] Replace Mark All Displayed Packets (toggle) with Invert All Displayed Marked/Unmarked Packets

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 --- Comment #9 from Sake s...@euronet.nl 2010-12-22 09:29:04 PST --- OK 100% score for option 1 ;-) I implemented option 1 in revision 35244. Chris, could you check whether this indeed provides enough flexibility for (un)marking sets of

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5279] Replace Mark All Displayed Packets (toggle) with Invert All Displayed Marked/Unmarked Packets

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5513] Prepare Filter in RTP Streams dialog does not work correctly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5513 Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5279] Replace Mark All Displayed Packets (toggle) with Invert All Displayed Marked/Unmarked Packets

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 --- Comment #11 from Sake s...@euronet.nl 2010-12-22 12:42:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) I implemented option 1 in revision 35244. Chris, could you check whether this indeed provides enough

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5515] The MAC of a switch which appears in captures doesn't match with the real one.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5515 Sake s...@euronet.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5516] New: Server 2008: tshark -i - doesn't work like it does on windows XP

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5516 Summary: Server 2008: tshark -i - doesn't work like it does on windows XP Product: Wireshark Version: 1.4.2 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Windows Server 2008

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5279] Replace Mark All Displayed Packets (toggle) with Invert All Displayed Marked/Unmarked Packets

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 --- Comment #12 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-22 14:24:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Well, the whole point of ignoring packets is to prevent them from being dissected. True. But actually there are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5496] IEC60870-5-104: fix computing of milliseconds in CP56time2a and add bitstring of 32 bits and step position support (ASDU types 5, 7, 32, 33, 47, 51, 60 and 64)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4393] Error when compiling due to uninitialized variables and -Werror flag

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4393 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4397] Wireshark crashes when capturing packets at random on OS X 10.6.2 Server (Snow Leopard)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4397 --- Comment #6 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-22 16:46:38 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) Will follow-up shortly. Any update? We're now at 1.4.2 on the stable branch and 1.5.0-SVN-35249 on the development

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4409] minor bug in bgp dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4409 Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5657|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5501] command line options don't work in OSX

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5501 --- Comment #2 from Chris Welsh rednectar.ch...@gmail.com 2010-12-22 20:50:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) OS X GUI applications don't take that sort of command-line option. In addition, as Wireshark is, even on OS X, an X11-based

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5516] Server 2008: tshark -i - doesn't work like it does on windows XP

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5516 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Fisher st...@stephen-fisher.com 2010-12-22 23:10:04 MST --- (In reply to comment #0) The NPF driver isn't running. You may have trouble capturing or listing interfaces. I'm downloading and installing the