[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12882] TCP packets sometimes are incorrectly parsed as TDS (or other corruptions)

2017-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882 --- Comment #14 from Michael Mann --- (In reply to Nathan Cole from comment #13) > Created attachment 15129 [details] > TDS response message with many TDS "packets" > > Packets 285 - 489 are not processed correctly

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13745] RADIUS dictionary: BEGIN-VENDOR does not support format=Extended-Vendor-Specific-*

2017-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13745 --- Comment #8 from João Valverde --- @Marius Can you provide the full dictionary for this capture? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12779] Add TLS 1.3 support

2017-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12779 Thomas Baudelet changed: What|Removed |Added CC|thomas.baude...@gmail.com | --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13745] RADIUS dictionary: BEGIN-VENDOR does not support format=Extended-Vendor-Specific-*

2017-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13745 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 21913 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: RADIUS: Fix gda9363e202 https://code.wireshark.org/review/21913 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12958] Wrong JSON format returned by new -T json feature

2017-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12958 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wurm --- > > Regarding nested fields I think Elasticsearch accept it, but Kibana does not > > fully support it or there was some similar problem. Therefor I decided > > better to have flat