https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15035
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15033
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15033
--- Comment #2 from barcarol...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15005 ***
It would be odd if editcap supports per-frame comments while tshark supports
per-file
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barcarol...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15033
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15035
--- Comment #5 from Ram Seshan ---
(In reply to Jaap Keuter from comment #3)
> Created attachment 16538 [details]
> IEEE 802.3bt frame
Alexis La Goutte:
I appreciate your effort to incorporate support for 802.3bt TLV extensions.
I
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29062 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
PKIX: support TLS Feature extension (RFC 7633)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29062
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15053
--- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29061 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Honsel:
NSH TTL according to RFC8300
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29061
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15053
Bug ID: 15053
Summary: NSH TTL according to RFC 8300 (currently declared as
reserved bits)
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
--- Comment #6 from Peter Wu ---
The extension is actually called "TLS Feature", "must staple" is one of the
uses. I'm working on a patch.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7633#appendix-A
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15035
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29059 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
LLDP: Add dissection of 802.3BT TLV Extension
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29059
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16540|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15011
--- Comment #19 from Peter Wu ---
The dissector supports two modes:
1. Peer identification based on the static public key.
2. Full decryption using a key log file.
For (1), simply configure the "WireGuard static keys" protocol
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
--- Comment #5 from Francesco Papini ---
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #1)
> Please, next time attach the pcap and key on 2 different attachement
Sorry, I didn't know. Attached the 2 files right now. Thanks!
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
--- Comment #4 from Francesco Papini ---
Created attachment 16543
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16543=edit
traffic
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
Francesco Papini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16541|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
--- Comment #2 from Francesco Papini ---
Created attachment 16541
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16541=edit
private key
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|IN_PROGRESS
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29056 merged by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29056
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29055 merged by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29055
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29056 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29056
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29055 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29055
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29054 merged by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29054
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 29054 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
HTTP: set correct server port for tunnels
https://code.wireshark.org/review/29054
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15051
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15052
Bug ID: 15052
Summary: OCSP Must-Staple - OID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.24 - Dissector
for OID not implemented
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.6.2
Hardware: All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15038
--- Comment #10 from Xiaochuan Sun ---
Created attachment 16539
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16539=edit
decodes F1AP UL RRC TRANSFER correctly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15038
--- Comment #9 from Xiaochuan Sun ---
You are right. I changed f1ap.cnf according to xxx.asn file, the UL RRC
message transfer message can be decoded correctly.
The below command is wrriten in the header of packet-f1ap.c file. It
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15051
Bug ID: 15051
Summary: packet-tcp.c:3511: failed assertion "proto_desegment
&& pinfo->can_desegment
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
32 matches
Mail list logo
