https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28714 merged by Guy Harris:
OpcUa: fix in function getExtensionObjectType
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28714
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28714 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
OpcUa: fix in function getExtensionObjectType
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28714
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28328 merged by Anders Broman:
OpcUa: fix in function getExtensionObjectType
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28328
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28328 had a related patch set uploaded by Erika Szelleová:
OpcUa: fix in function getExtensionObjectType
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28328
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #8 from Erika Szelleova ---
I think I have found the culprit. The function tried to read the value
"numeric" (in this case: Identifier) but it tried to read the incorrect bytes
(it moved 4 bytes to the right from the value
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #7 from Mark Giraud ---
The 8 bytes should be parsed as something like this:
###[ UaExtensionObject ]###
\TypeId\
|###[ UaNumericNodeId ]###
| Encoding = 2
| Namespace = 0
| Identifier= 0
Encoding =
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #6 from Mark Giraud ---
The last 8 bytes should be dissected as en ExtensionObject.
This should be possible without any issues, since they are
b'\x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
I think there might be some kind of issue in
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #5 from Erika Szelleova ---
OK, so the problem is that the AdditionalHeader is parsed as an
ExtensionObject, however, according to the spec. it should be reserved for
future use (see Part 4 p. 146). While parsing, the
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
Erika Szelleova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |IN_PROGRESS
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
--- Comment #2 from Mark Giraud ---
Created attachment 16182
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16182=edit
Short opc ua pcap with malformed packet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14465
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
12 matches
Mail list logo