https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #16 from Richard Sharpe ---
I also just filed a review request to have the same change merged into the
Wireshark 3.x series.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
Richard Sharpe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #14 from Richard Sharpe ---
There is also a more severe error.
If there are multiple channels specified, the MAC address list will be
incorrectly handled.
A patch should be ready soon.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #13 from Richard Sharpe ---
Hmmm, having looked at it more carefully I see that the dissection is
incorrect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #12 from Richard Sharpe ---
Created attachment 17412
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17412=edit
What the new code shows
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #11 from Richard Sharpe ---
According to the Multi-AP_Specification_Addendum_v1.0.13-20190913c-clean.docx
that packet is actually malformed.
The MAC address is properly handled and shows as a Fluent_36:93:a9.
The 59 is
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #10 from thangphu...@gmail.com ---
@Richard Sharpe - At the moment I am limited to 2.6.8 if I install updates from
the Ubuntu Software collections. But I also have a Windows machine with newer
version that I can use.
@Alexis
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #9 from Alexis La Goutte ---
(In reply to thangphu206 from comment #7)
> That's great. When would be the next official release with the push? I am
> currently on a Linux platform so the latest version I am able to upgrade to
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #8 from Richard Sharpe ---
(In reply to thangphu206 from comment #7)
> That's great. When would be the next official release with the push? I am
> currently on a Linux platform so the latest version I am able to upgrade to
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #7 from thangphu...@gmail.com ---
That's great. When would be the next official release with the push? I am
currently on a Linux platform so the latest version I am able to upgrade to is
2.6.8. Hopefully the push will also be
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #6 from Richard Sharpe ---
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Sharpe from comment #4)
> > OK, that's the Multi-AP specification. I didn't realize it was ratified
> > already.
> >
> > There
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #4 from Richard Sharpe ---
OK, that's the Multi-AP specification. I didn't realize it was ratified
already.
There are likely lots of changes between current Wireshark and what was done
for WFA.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #3 from thangphu...@gmail.com ---
@Richard Sharpe Version 1.0.
@Alexis La Goutte I believe it can be obtained here:
https://www.wi-fi.org/downloads-registered-guest/Multi-AP_Specification_v1.0.pdf/35509
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #2 from Richard Sharpe ---
I have the spec, but the question is, which version was the packet created at.
I will try to have a look at this soon.
It should be easy to fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE
16 matches
Mail list logo
