https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
xqjc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xqjc...@gmail.com
--
You are r
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Stephen Fisher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Stephen Fisher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #6086|review_for_checkin? |review_for_checkin+
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Fisher 2011-03-28
14:53:33 MDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created an attachment (id=6086)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6086) [details]
> Correct hextile encoding patch, ready
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Stephen Fisher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Yaniv Kaul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #6086||review_for_checkin?
Fla
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Yaniv Kaul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5958|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Jaap Keuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5958|review_for_checkin? |review_for_checkin-
Fl
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
Yaniv Kaul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #5958||review_for_checkin?
Fla
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #7 from Yaniv Kaul 2011-02-19 23:41:20 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=5958)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5958)
hextile encoding patch - without desegementation, ready for inclusion
--
Configur
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #6 from Yaniv Kaul 2011-02-17 08:52:40 PST ---
Attached please find a patch that fixes the current behaviour and correctly
dissects hextile encoded messages - if they are not more than 1 packet long.
Please consider applying.
It
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #5 from Yaniv Kaul 2010-12-15 12:03:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=5620)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5620) [details]
> patch (not for commit!) for packet-vnc.c - w
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #4 from Yaniv Kaul 2010-12-15 12:02:38 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=5620)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5620)
patch (not for commit!) for packet-vnc.c - with basic desegmentation support
--
C
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #3 from Yaniv Kaul 2010-11-03 09:01:51 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is one of the problems I ran into developing the VNC dissector
> originally.
> Because the length of the current message isn't known at the beginni
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #2 from Yaniv Kaul 2010-11-03 08:57:41 PDT ---
*** Bug 5367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Fisher 2009-12-28
17:50:38 MST ---
This is one of the problems I ran into developing the VNC dissector originally.
Because the length of the current message isn't known at the beginning, but
instead it is exten
16 matches
Mail list logo
