https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #12 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2012-01-26 02:59:50 PST ---
This bug is not related to (In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
I don't see any CLNP packets. Is this bug therefore
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #13 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2012-01-26 03:29:39 PST ---
Created attachment 7731
-- https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7731
Screnshoot
A screenshot to highlight what the patch intends to correct.
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #10 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2012-01-25 09:40:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I don't see any CLNP packets. Is this bug therefore dependent upon bug 5622,
as Bill mentions in comment 3?
Yes, the CLNP packets are on top
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #11 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2012-01-25
09:56:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
I don't see any CLNP packets. Is this bug therefore dependent upon bug
5622,
as Bill
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #9 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2012-01-13
18:59:36 PST ---
I don't see any CLNP packets. Is this bug therefore dependent upon bug 5622,
as Bill mentions in comment 3?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #6 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2011-10-03 13:22:52 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=7143)
-- (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7143)
pcap with a wrong display of Route Recording NET(s)
On this example, we
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #7 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2011-10-03 13:24:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
To be more accurate :
The ping is forwarded = this is the 2nd packet
by a Router whose NET is
NET 4700278143505600
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
keysandw...@yahoo.ie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7144||review_for_checkin?
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #4 from keysandw...@yahoo.ie 2011-02-04 03:22:04 PST ---
Hello Bill,
Yes, on top of IP (IP protocol field = 0x50h).
By the way all the comments of Matthias are accurate and all these proposed
enhancements are welcome.
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #5 from Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com 2011-02-04 13:37:27 EST ---
Sample Capture File :
Cannot provide. Using a custom dissector in between because my clnp frames are
not on top of Ethernet.
(In reply to comment #4)
Hello
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #3 from Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com 2011-01-31 10:45:36 EST ---
Just for my curiosity:
In your case, what is clnp running on top of ?
(I'm currently reviewing another patch (Bug #5622) which includes a change to
handle clnp
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
keysandw...@yahoo.ie changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Linux (other) |All
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
--- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl 2011-01-14 14:53:29 CET
---
Please complete your bug report:
- Provide the build information, as requested, not just version number.
- Provide a sample capture file with packets
14 matches
Mail list logo