https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13652
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13664
Bug ID: 13664
Summary: [oss-fuzz] ASAN: heap-buffer-overflow
(run/tshark+0x103147) in __interceptor_strncmp.part.74
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86-64
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13664
--- Comment #1 from Peter Wu ---
Created attachment 15505
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15505=edit
Packet capture file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13588
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21340 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
ISUP: restore number indicators2 display like what was done in master-1.12
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13656
Bug ID: 13656
Summary: HEX highligh wrong byte
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86
OS: macOS 10.12
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Minor
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657
Bug ID: 13657
Summary: Reload this file button triggers segmentation fault
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86
OS: macOS 10.12
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13658
Bug ID: 13658
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2017-04-25-9297.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13592
hhw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15501|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13658
Dave Goodell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #4 from Pascal Quantin ---
*** Bug 13658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13658
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Bug ID: 13659
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2017-04-25-2225.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #5 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2)
> I'll look at trying with an ASAN build.
Mr. ASAN says:
ASAN:DEADLYSIGNAL
=
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin ---
*** Bug 13659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13659
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #7 from Guy Harris ---
That sure looks like a null pointer dereference (and the crash report from
macOS would probably have indicated that as well, if I'd bothered to look at
the failing address).
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21329 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Don't crash if we have no BOOTP option preferences.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21329
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21329 merged by Guy Harris:
Don't crash if we have no BOOTP option preferences.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21329
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eapa...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #10 from Guy Harris ---
Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Bug ID: 13660
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2017-04-25-3107.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
URL:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #11 from Stig Bjørlykke ---
*** Bug 13660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Stig Bjørlykke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
adarsh verma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
Bug ID: 13661
Summary: Wireshark is crashing after 5-10 seconds of startup.
Product: Wireshark
Version: 1.10.7
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 8.1
Status:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #1 from Peter Wu ---
Created attachment 15504
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15504=edit
Packet capture file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
Bug ID: 13662
Summary: [oss-fuzz] ASAN: stack-use-after-return
epan/dissectors/packet-ieee80211.c:14341:23 in
add_tagged_field
Product: Wireshark
Version:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #2 from Peter Wu ---
Requires ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_stack_use_after_return=1 for reproduction.
Issue seems legitimate, a stack variable is for some reason stored in
proto_data.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21333 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21333
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
--- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter ---
>From https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle
Version Stable Release Date End of Life
1.10 June 5, 2013 June 5, 2015
This version is already end of life.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13652
--- Comment #2 from Jörg Mayer ---
I looked at the patch and while some of it might be applicable, they will need
to be selected manually and especially the real veriwave specific changes need
to be found and applied
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Stig Bjørlykke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Bug ID: 13663
Summary: extcap: Capture from multiple interfaces does not
bring up Interface Details dialog
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.2.6
Hardware: All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Stig Bjørlykke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Extras |Qt UI
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21337 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21337
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21333 merged by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21333
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21338 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21338
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21337 merged by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21337
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21338 merged by Peter Wu:
ieee80211: fix stack-use-after-return
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21338
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13662
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #10)
> Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
... as well as in wmem_destroy_list()?
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #12)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #10)
> > Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
>
44 matches
Mail list logo