[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10245] Measurement of response time elements

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10245 Paul Offord changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 --- Comment #12 from Paul Offord --- I did. With the change in place, I performed a quick check with PerfView. With the 1M packet test file, TRANSUM now consumes the same amount of CPU as the TCP Sequence

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14148] New: Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148 Bug ID: 14148 Summary: Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries Product: Wireshark Version: 2.5.x (Experimental) Hardware:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14094] File loading is very slow with transum dissector enabled

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094 João Valverde changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14148] Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148 --- Comment #2 from Alexis La Goutte --- for second point, it is coming from 802.11-2016 (p1717) On accepting an active or passive mode Beacon request, a STA shall conduct measurements as follows: — If the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14148] Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148 --- Comment #1 from Alexis La Goutte --- (In reply to Jan Fuchs from comment #0) > -- > Subelement Data and Preference are duplicative fields in the given PCAP file > - both have the same value 255 == 0xff. As

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14147] Visual Studio Community Edition 2015 lacks tools named in developer guide

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14147 --- Comment #3 from Mike Hammond --- I think we'd probably need to apply a fix to both the chocolatey install procedure as well as the "you download it yourself" procedure. It seems that neither route currently

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14148] Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14146] IO Graph - Line remain in edit mode and doesnt respond to input

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14146 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13585] IO Graph entry line won't return to default focus after edit

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13585 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12297] Segment Routing Extension in OSPF

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12297 --- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24070 merged by Michael Mann: OSPFv2 Segment Routing extention support with RFC7684. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24070 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12297] Segment Routing Extension in OSPF

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12297 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14148] Duplicate fields in BSS Transition Management Request Candidate List Entries

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148 --- Comment #3 from Jan Fuchs --- It's a TLV structure, sure. Type: Subelement ID: BSS Transition Candidate Preference (0x03) Length: 1 Byte Value: Subelement Data: ff Value: Preference: 255 Twice the value, or am I

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Henoch --- I pushed two commits with possible solutions for this. The first one changes the autodetection to consider the possibility of a 0-9 packet containing two frames. The second

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24108 had a related patch set uploaded by Magnus Henoch: Autodetect more AMQP 0-9 captures https://code.wireshark.org/review/24108 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24109 had a related patch set uploaded by Magnus Henoch: Add preference for AMQP version detection https://code.wireshark.org/review/24109 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #6 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Nicolas Darchis from comment #3) > the only catch is that at the time the MCS value is inserted in the current > code we didn't take a look at the 11ac flag yet. So I've

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13984] "tshark -G ?" doesn't provide expected help

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13984 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24125 merged by Michael Mann: tshark: Use -G help instead of -G ? https://code.wireshark.org/review/24125 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13984] "tshark -G ?" doesn't provide expected help

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13984 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24133 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: tshark: Use -G help instead of -G ? https://code.wireshark.org/review/24133 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13984] "tshark -G ?" doesn't provide expected help

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13984 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13984] "tshark -G ?" doesn't provide expected help

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13984 --- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24134 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: tshark: Use -G help instead of -G ? https://code.wireshark.org/review/24134 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24136 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: peekremote: Support properly 11ac MCS rates. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24136 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24136 merged by Guy Harris: peekremote: Support properly 11ac MCS rates. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24136 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24137 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: peekremote: Support properly 11ac MCS rates. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24137 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24137 merged by Guy Harris: peekremote: Support properly 11ac MCS rates. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24137 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24130 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24130 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24129 merged by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24129 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24129 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24129 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24124 merged by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24124 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24130 merged by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24130 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13984] "tshark -G ?" doesn't provide expected help

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13984 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24125 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: tshark: Use -G help instead of -G ? https://code.wireshark.org/review/24125 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14115] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-knxnetip.c:936: bad bitmask ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24124 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: packet-knxnetip.c: Fix bitmask https://code.wireshark.org/review/24124 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14136] Peekremote dissector does not decode 11ac MCS rates properly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24079 merged by Michael Mann: peekremote: Support properly 11ac MCS rates. https://code.wireshark.org/review/24079 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24123 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24123 --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24127 merged by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24127 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24123 merged by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24123 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24127 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24127 --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 Michael Mann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24126 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24126 --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14116] wireshark-2.4.2/epan/dissectors/packet-q931.c:1306: bad compare ?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24126 merged by Michael Mann: Q931: Fix Q931_ISO_IEC_STANDARDIZED_CODING value https://code.wireshark.org/review/24126 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 24108 merged by Michael Mann: Autodetect more AMQP 0-9 captures https://code.wireshark.org/review/24108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You