https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris ---
Nope, it's line 3078 in the current version of epan/proto.c, and that's
g_assert(handle != NULL);
so it appears that the WiMAX plugin didn't manage to get a dissector handle
it's
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
Bug ID: 14322
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2018-01-11-10390.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Ubuntu
Status:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin ---
*** Bug 14323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14323
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14323
Bug ID: 14323
Summary: Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2018-01-11-23162.pcap
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Ubuntu
Status:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris ---
I've seen this, too, and here's a *symbolicated* stack trace:
Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x7fffa6289d42
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 |All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14314
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #2 from rene ---
or better : extend the key from req-id to (0x+req-id) for host to
device and (0x0001+req-id) for device to host ..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
Bug ID: 14321
Summary: confuse transactions at u3v dissector on mixed cmd and
event transactions
Product: Wireshark
Version: 2.4.3
Hardware: x86
OS:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #1 from rene ---
correction : to see in packet-u3v.c at line 1796 ff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #5 from rene ---
with a lot of effort I have been able to create a pcap, but ohh ash on my main
- the u3v dissector does it correctly - the usb_conv_info here is different per
endpoint - unlike our
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Gentoo |All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ui/gtk/about_dlg.c:480:3: |Build fails with
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25229 merged by Anders Broman:
IxVeriWave: Adjust signature timestamp checking.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25229
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #41 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25239 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
QUIC: Add new error code from draft-08
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25239
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25240 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Fix build with GTK+ and without libsmi and GeoIP.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25240
--
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25240 merged by Guy Harris:
Fix build with GTK+ and without libsmi and GeoIP.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25240
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
Bug ID: 14320
Summary: Duplicate code to dissect docsis modem capabilities
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
--- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25246 merged by Gerald Combs:
IxVeriWave: Adjust signature timestamp checking.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25246
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
--- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25245 merged by Gerald Combs:
IxVeriWave: Adjust signature timestamp checking.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25245
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #42 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25239 merged by Anders Broman:
QUIC: Add new error code from draft-08
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25239
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25245 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs:
IxVeriWave: Adjust signature timestamp checking.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25245
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #4 from rene ---
Created attachment 16066
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16066=edit
u3v pcap with interested flow (cmd, event, ack)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25246 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs:
IxVeriWave: Adjust signature timestamp checking.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25246
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #43 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 25184 merged by Anders Broman:
TLS(QUIC): minimal Transport Parameter Length is 22
https://code.wireshark.org/review/25184
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14251
--- Comment #9 from Gerald Combs ---
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #8)
> This doesn't appear to be exploitable or cause a denial of service using our
> standard (wmem) memory allocator, and therefore doesn't
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14246
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Medium
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14315
--- Comment #2 from elias abou hamad ---
Dear Pascal,
I install the new release of tshark the below info :
TShark (Wireshark) 2.5.0-2309-gbe143963 (v2.5.0rc0-2309-gbe14396)
Copyright 1998-2018 Gerald Combs
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14315
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin ---
I do not know anything about this protocol, but can you have different numbers
of entreprise private entries per flow? If no, then it's easy to match the
number of entries
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14266
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE |RESOLVED
34 matches
Mail list logo