[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Power Capability tag interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Mac OS X 10.4 |All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] New: ed...@communicaone.com

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Bug ID: 14594 Summary: ed...@communicaone.com Product: Wireshark Version: 2.4.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X 10.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] Channel Set - Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Eddie Forero changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ed...@communicaone.com |Channel

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Eddie Forero changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Channel Set - Channel 165 |Channel

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14592] Frame check sequence: 0x00000000 incorrect on short packets from one device

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14592 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Maynard --- (In reply to LorenAmelang from comment #0) > I'm pretty sure this is a minor glitch, after searching a bit. But it was > certainly a distraction from my real

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26805 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Max and min transmit power, in the Power Capabilities IE, are signed.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26804 merged by Guy Harris: Max and min transmit power, in the Power Capabilities IE, are signed. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26804 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26805 merged by Guy Harris: Max and min transmit power, in the Power Capabilities IE, are signed. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26805 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26806 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Max and min transmit power, in the Power Capabilities IE, are signed.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14591] MQTT Message Decoding Enhancement for allowing sub-dissection of payload

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14591 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26803 had a related patch set uploaded by Stig Bjørlykke: mqtt: Add option to uncompress message when decoding https://code.wireshark.org/review/26803

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14591] MQTT Message Decoding Enhancement for allowing sub-dissection of payload

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14591 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26803 merged by Stig Bjørlykke: mqtt: Add option to uncompress message when decoding https://code.wireshark.org/review/26803 -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14591] MQTT Message Decoding Enhancement for allowing sub-dissection of payload

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14591 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26794 merged by Stig Bjørlykke: mqtt: Add option to uncompress message when decoding https://code.wireshark.org/review/26794 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] New: Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 Bug ID: 14593 Summary: Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly Product: Wireshark Version: 2.4.6 Hardware: x86 OS:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14593] Tag: Power Capability Min: 249, Max :19 valuable interpreted incorrectly

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14593 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26806 merged by Guy Harris: Max and min transmit power, in the Power Capabilities IE, are signed. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26806 -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14591] MQTT Message Decoding Enhancement for allowing sub-dissection of payload

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14591 Christopher Maynard changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] In the 802.11 Supported Channels IE, Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86 |All

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13932] HTTP2/GRPC/ProtoBuf: Add new GRPC and ProtoBuf dissectors, and make little change on http2 dissector for providing some information to grpc dissection.

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13932 --- Comment #20 from Huang Qiangxiong --- (In reply to Alexander Petrossian (PAF) from comment #19) > Michael, friends. > Is this anywhere near releasing? > > Judging from comments most (all?) work is already

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14592] Frame check sequence: 0x00000000 incorrect on short packets from one device

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14592 --- Comment #2 from LorenAmelang --- @Christopher, Thanks for the reply! I just spaced through several of the packets from this device, trying to learn how this issue arises. It looks like Wireshark recognizes some of

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] In the 802.11 Supported Channels IE, Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14532] extcap: InterfaceToolbar control pipe broken

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14532 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26813 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: ws_pipe: Zero an array. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26813 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] In the 802.11 Supported Channels IE, Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 --- Comment #2 from Eddie Forero --- OK, so the device is sending the channel sets. I was confused because the standard says, "The Number of Channels field is set to the number of channels in a subband of

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14594] In the 802.11 Supported Channels IE, Channel 165 should be in Channel set #4 since it's now part of UNII-3

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14594 --- Comment #3 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Eddie Forero from comment #2) > OK, so the device is sending the channel sets. > > I was confused because the standard says, "The Number of Channels field is > set to the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14532] extcap: InterfaceToolbar control pipe broken

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14532 --- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 26815 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: ws_pipe: Zero an array. https://code.wireshark.org/review/26815 -- You are receiving this