https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 35816 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
ISAKMP: Dissect ID data types also for GDOI SA TEK
https://code.wireshark.org/review/35816
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
--- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 35811 merged by Anders Broman:
ISAKMP: Dissect ID data types also for GDOI SA TEK
https://code.wireshark.org/review/35811
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16330
giel.oberhols...@dimensiondata.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333
--- Comment #2 from liuwenhua2...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 17570
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17570=edit
pcap file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333
--- Comment #3 from liuwenhua2...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #1)
> Hi,
>
> Can you attach a pcap and not a screenshot ?
>
> can you also push directly the fix ? you can look
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #11)
> Change 34987 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> CoAP: fixes for TCP transport
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/34987
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16064
--- Comment #1 from Gerald Combs ---
Unable to duplicate the issue here on Ubuntu 18.04 with Valgrind and with ASAN.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
--- Comment #20 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #19)
> (In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #11)
> > Change 34987 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
> > CoAP: fixes for TCP
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16258
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bi
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16324
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bi
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333
Bug ID: 16333
Summary: NVMe/TCP ICReq PDU Not Interpreted Correctly
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: x86
OS: macOS 10.14
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
--- Comment #21 from Pascal Quantin ---
A quick and dirty fix is to use instead
if (pinfo->ptype != PT_TCP || proto_is_frame_protocol(pinfo->layers,
"mqtt")) {
/* Assume UDP */
return
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
Uli Heilmeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 35811 had a related patch set uploaded by Uli Heilmeier:
ISAKMP: Dissect ID data types also for GDOI SA TEK
https://code.wireshark.org/review/35811
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christopher.mayn...@igt.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #1)
> This is a consequence of this (very old) change:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Bug ID: 16334
Summary: ICMP no respose without request
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Enrico Vittorini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enrico.vittor...@outlook.co
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16335
Bug ID: 16335
Summary: PVS-Studio analyser long list of issues (i will give
patches here and on gerrit)
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #5)
> Those are the lines you explicitly added in 2012, as seen in the commit I
> referred.
> Any chance you remember why you did this change? It' quite
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15534
--- Comment #9 from Gerald Combs ---
*** Bug 13908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13908
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #3)
> I *believe* it's correct though.
Assuming this is the right fix, then these same 2 lines should also be removed
from the ICMPv6 dissector
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin ---
Those are the lines you explicitly added in 2012, as seen in the commit I
referred.
Any chance you remember why you did this change? It' quite a long time though.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16240
--- Comment #11 from Gerald Combs ---
*** Bug 15875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13818
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16335
Balling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15875
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Normal
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #8 from Chuck Craft ---
http://www.microhowto.info/howto/calculate_an_internet_protocol_checksum_in_c.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
Chuck Craft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bubbas...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Chuck Craft from comment #7)
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1624
> " In one's complement, there are two representations of zero: the all
>zero and the all one bit values,
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16261
gordon.w.r...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gordon.w.r...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16332
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16331
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
37 matches
Mail list logo
