https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
--- Comment #30 from Tomasz Mon ---
(In reply to Joel Holdsworth from comment #29)
> I tested the git commit 055b4c59e4, and it's working better and better. One
> request: would it be be possible to group commands and payloads together as
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16411
Bug ID: 16411
Summary: Filter bthci_cmd.le_long_tem_key is spelled
incorrectly
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.1
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
--- Comment #31 from Joel Holdsworth ---
Yeah - that would be far more readable.
You could also put the values in the headline item, or summarize them in cases
where the text would be excessively long.
[-] FTDI Multi-Protocol
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16411
--- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36186 had a related patch set uploaded by Alexis La Goutte:
bthci_cmd: fix typo
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36186
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14453
--- Comment #8 from Tomasz Mon ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #7)
> (In reply to Tomasz Mon from comment #6)
> > Is this by any chance caused by the same problem as Bug 13744? Can it be
> > reproduced after
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14453
--- Comment #7 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Tomasz Mon from comment #6)
> Is this by any chance caused by the same problem as Bug 13744? Can it be
> reproduced after https://code.wireshark.org/review/33014?
I can't even reproduce it
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16412
--- Comment #1 from Filipe Laíns ---
Created attachment 17650
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17650=edit
LTE SIM Write
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16412
Bug ID: 16412
Summary: Add ability to dissect LTE SIM card communication
(CCID)
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16336
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|display filter parsing |Display filter parsing
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16344
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ipv4 fragment offset VALUE |IPv4 fragment offset value
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16388
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|lacp dissector consumes all |LACP dissector consumes all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16387
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|lldp dissector consumes all |LLDP dissector consumes all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16394
Gerald Combs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Crash in wireguard |Crash in WireGuard
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16411
--- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36186 merged by Anders Broman:
bthci_cmd: fix typo
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36186
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14453
Betty DuBois changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16410
Betty DuBois changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.wireshark.org/
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
--- Comment #29 from Joel Holdsworth ---
Created attachment 17646
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17646=edit
Ungrouped command payloads
I tested the git commit 055b4c59e4, and it's working better and better.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16035
--- Comment #10 from giel.oberhols...@dimensiondata.com ---
Any feedback on this enhancement request?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #288 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36180 merged by Anders Broman:
QUIC,TLS: update transport parameter encoding (draft-27)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36180
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16402
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36175 merged by Anders Broman:
goose: test field is renamed to simulation
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36175
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16394
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36159 merged by Anders Broman:
WireGuard: fix null pointer crash
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36159
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #286 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36179 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
TLS (QUIC): Add min_ack_delay TP
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36179
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #287 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36180 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu:
QUIC,TLS: update transport parameter encoding (draft-27)
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36180
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16394
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|IN_PROGRESS
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
--- Comment #7 from Peter Wu ---
The class has ended, but the patches have not been merged since there were some
open issues that have never been addressed. It is currently a proposed project
for GSoC 2020:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16410
Bug ID: 16410
Summary: Importing profiles in Windows - zip files fail and
from directory crashes Wireshark
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.1
Hardware: x86
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16410
--- Comment #1 from Betty DuBois ---
Just to be sure it was not something in my profile (the students were copying
from me), I just tested it with copies of a completely blank Default profile
and the results were the same.
--
You are
27 matches
Mail list logo
